Education of Primary School Mathematics (한국수학교육학회지시리즈C:초등수학교육)

Korean Society of Mathematical Education (한국수학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Exploring the Improvement of Mathematics Curriculum Achievement Standards for Elementary School in Competency-Based: Focused on comparing 'Number and Arithmetic' in Korean and Australian Curriculum

초등학교 수학과 교육과정 성취기준의 역량 기반 개선 방안 탐색 : 한국과 호주 '수와 연산' 영역 비교를 중심으로

  • Lee, Hwa Young (Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science & Creativity)
  • Received : 2020.09.05
  • Accepted : 2020.10.26
  • Published : 2020.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study, considering the OECD's DeSeCo and 2030 projects, the curriculum to develop competency was expected to be more emphasized, and the evaluation standards of the 2015 revised mathematics curriculum for elementary school in Korea and the Australian curriculum were analyzed in depth. To this end, the capabilities newly emphasized in the OECD 2030 Project were examined in detail and examined how the Australian elementary school mathematics curriculum included capabilities in achievement standards and content descriptions. The achievement standards of elementary school mathematics curriculum in Korea and Australia were matched, and the contents of number and arithmetic domain were compared and analyzed, and the skill verbs included in the achievement standards were analyzed and compared to see how their competencies were reflected in the achievement standards. Based on the results of the analysis, implications for improving math achievement standards were derived to faithfully reflect the capabilities into the mathematics curriculum.

본 연구에서는 OECD의 DeSeCo 및 2030 프로젝트의 동향을 고려하였을 때 역량을 기르는 교육과정이 더욱 강조될 것으로 예상하고 역량 기반의 교육과정 성취기준 개선 방안을 모색하였다. 이를 위해 OECD 2030 프로젝트에서 새롭게 강조하는 역량을 살펴보고, 호주 초등학교 수학과 교육과정에서 역량을 성취규준과 내용 해설에 어떻게 담아냈는지 고찰하였다. 우리나라 2015 개정 초등학교 수학과 교육과정과 호주 교육과정의 성취기준을 매칭하고 수와 연산 영역의 내용을 중심으로 심층적으로 비교 분석하였으며, 역량이 성취기준에 반영되어 있는 양상을 살펴보기 위하여 성취기준에 포함된 기능 동사를 분석하여 비교하였다. 분석한 결과를 토대로 수학과 교육과정에서 성취기준에 역량을 충실히 반영하기 위한 개선 방안과 시사점을 도출하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kang, H. & Ryu, S. R.(2019). A Comparative Analysis of Elementary School Curriculum for Mathematics in Korea and Japan: Focus on 2015 Revised Curriculum. Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea, 23(2), pp.219-245.
  2. Ministry of Education(2015). Mathematics Curriculum. 2015-74(Book 8).
  3. Kwon, O. N., Lee, K. W., Lee, A. R. & Han, C. R. (2019) A comparative study on the external & internal structure of mathematics curriculum between Korea and Japan: Focusing on the aspects of recent revisions. Journal of Korean Society of Mathematics Education Series A: The Mathematical Education, 58(2), 187-223.
  4. Kwon, J. R., Lee, K. O., Min, Y. S., Kim, H. M., Kim, K, C. & Kim, H. J. (2018). International Comparative Study of Subject CurriculumonElementary and Secondary School: Focused on Korean Language, SocialStudies, mathematics, Physical Education, and Music Subject. Korea Institute of Curriculum & Evaluation report RRC 2018-10.
  5. Kim, S. H., Park, K. M. & Lee, H. C. (2015). An Exploration of International Trends about the Core Competencies in Mathematics Curriculum. Journal of Korean Society of Mathematics Education Series A: The Mathematical Education, 54(1), 65-81.
  6. Kim, S. K.(2019). A Comparative Analysis of the Mathematics Curriculum in Korea and New Zealand. Journal of Korea Society Educational Studies in Mathematics School Mathematics 21(3). 625-644.
  7. Kim, J. Y., Ok, H. J. & Cho, J. Y. (2020). Analysis of the 2015 Rivised Korean Languages Curriculum in terms of the OECD Education 2030 competencies. The Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation, 23(3), pp. 1-22.
  8. Kim, J. Y., Lee, M. K., Lee, G. H., Seo, J. Y., Cho, S. M., Bae, H. S. & Choi, I, S. (2019) Analysis of the Accomplishments in the OECD Education 2030 Project Phase1; Focusing on the International Comparison of the Curriculum Policy and the Curriculum content Mapping(CCM). KICE.
  9. Na, G. S., Par, M. M., Kim, D. W., Kim. Y. & Lee, S. J. (2018). Exploring the Direction of Mathematics Education In the Future Age. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics 28(4), 437-478. https://doi.org/10.29275/jerm.2018.11.28.4.437
  10. Park, K, M., Lee, H. C., Park, S. H., Kang, E. J., Kim S. H., Yim, H. M., Chang, H. W., Kang, T. S., Kwon, J. R., Kim, M, J., Pang, J. S., Lee, H. Y., Lee, M, G., Kim, H. K., Yun, S. H., Lee, K. E., Lee, G. S., Cho, H. J., Kwon, O. N., Shin. D. K, Kang, H. Y., Kim, J. Y., Do, J. H., Park, J. Sl, Seo, B. E., An, H. J., Oh, T. G., Lee, K. J., Lee, G. Y., Lee, M. H., Lee, S. H., Lee, E. J., Lee, J. Y., Jeon, I. T., Choi, J. S., Han, J. C. & Hwang, S. M. (2015) A Study of Development of draft on 2015 revised Mathematics Curriculum. Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science & Creativity.
  11. Park, K. S. (2013). An Anaysis of Modes in the Learning-Content Achievement Standards ofKorean 2011 Elementary Mathematics Curriculum: focused on 'Understand', 'Know', and 'Meaning', Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 23(4), 517-531.
  12. Back, J., Lim, D. & Kang, W. (2019). An Anlaysis on Curriculum Elements of the Elementary Mathematics Curriculum since 1997 in Korea. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 29(2), 339-362. https://doi.org/10.29275/jerm.2019.5.29.2.339
  13. Yang, S. H.(2019). The Reflective consideration for the ‘Content System’ of 2015 Revised Mathematics Curriculum: Focused on ‘Key concept’, ‘Generalized Knowledge’ and ‘Skill“. Journal of Korea Society Educational Studies in Mathematics, School Mathematics. 21(2), 347-367.
  14. Lee, G. W., Jeong, Y. G., Seo, Y. J., Jeong, C. W., Choi, J. S., Park, M. H., Lee, B. W., Jin, E. N., Yu, J. A., Lee, K. E., Park, S. Y., Ju, H. M., Back, N. J., On, J. D., Lee, G. H. & Kim, S. H. (2014). A Study on the Guidelines for Subject curriculum Development. Korea Institute of Curriculum & Evaluation TRKO201500012775.
  15. Lee, M. K., Seo, J. Y., Lee, G. H., Cho, S. M., Kim, K. C., Yu, C, W., Kim, J. Y., Lee, J. J. & Yun, K. J. (2018). A Study on Content Curriculum Mapping of Korea in the OECD Education 2030 Project. Korea Institute of Curriculum & Evaluation.
  16. Chang, H. (2016). A Longitudinal Study on the Mahtematic Contents Chaged in 2015 National Revised Curriculum for Elementary School Mathematics. Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea, 20(2), 215-238.
  17. Chong, Y. O., Chang, K. Y., Kim, G., Kwon, N. Y., Kim, J. H., Seo, D. Y., Knag, H. Y., Park, S. H., Ko, H. K., Nam, J. Y. & Tak, B. (2016). A Comparative Study of Mathematics Curriculum among the United States, Singapore, England, Japan, Australia. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 26(3), 371-402.
  18. Han, D. H.(2010). Debates on the New National Elementary Mathematics Curriculum Content, Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea, 14(3), 633-658.
  19. ACARA (2015). Australian Curriculum: Mathematics: Sequence of content F-6. Retrieved from www.australiancurriculum.com.au
  20. ACARA (2020). Australian Curriculum: F-10 Curriculum, Mathematics. Retrieved from https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10-curriculum/mathematics/
  21. OECD. (2019). OECD Learning Compass 2030: A Series of Concept Notes. Paris: OECD.
  22. Stephens, M. (2014). The Australian Curriculum: Mathematics-How Did it come About? What Challenges Does it present for Teachers and for the Teaching of Mathematics? In Y. Li & G. Lappan (Ed.), Mathematics Curriculum in School Education, Advances in Mathematics Education, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
  23. UNESCO. (2015). Rethinking education: Towards a global common goods? Paris: UNESCO.