DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Lens Dose Reduction Methods and Image Quality in Orbital Computed Tomography Scan

안와 전산화단층촬영검사 시 수정체 선량감소 방법과 영상 평가

  • Moon, Se-Young (Department of Radiology, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital) ;
  • Hong, Sang-Woo (Department of Radiology, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital) ;
  • Seo, Ji-Sook (Department of Radiology, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Yeong-Beom (Department of Radiology, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital) ;
  • Kwak, Wan-Sin (Department of Radiology, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Seong-Yeong (Department of Radiology, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Jung-Soo (Department of Radiological Technology, Dongnam Health University)
  • 문세영 (국민건강보험 일산병원 영상의학과) ;
  • 홍상우 (국민건강보험 일산병원 영상의학과) ;
  • 서지숙 (국민건강보험 일산병원 영상의학과) ;
  • 김영범 (국민건강보험 일산병원 영상의학과) ;
  • 곽완신 (국민건강보험 일산병원 영상의학과) ;
  • 이성영 (국민건강보험 일산병원 영상의학과) ;
  • 김정수 (동남보건대학교 방사선과)
  • Received : 2020.10.22
  • Accepted : 2020.10.28
  • Published : 2020.10.31

Abstract

This study analyzed dose reduction and quality of images through dose reduction tools and shielding board to protect sensitive eye lens in radiation during orbit CT examinations for clinical data use. During CT scans of the phantom, surface dose (CT scanner dosimetry phantom, ion chamber-3 times) and quality of image (radiosurgery head phantom, visual assessment-2 times, HU standard deviation) were evaluated using X-care which is dose reduction tools and bismuth shielding board. The results of experiments of eight conditions showed a relatively reduced dose in all other conditions compared to when no conditions were set. In particular, the area corresponding to the ophthalmic part reduced the surface dose by up to 45.7 %. The visual evaluation of images by specialists and the quality evaluation of images analyzed by HU standard deviation were clinically closest to the use of X-care and shielding board (1 cm in height). Therefore, it is believed that the use of shielding board in a suitable location with dose reduction tools while investigating the optimal radiation dose will reduce the exposure dose of sensitive lens at radiation while maintaining the quality of the images with high diagnostic value.

Keywords

References

  1. Yu L, Liu X, Leng S, Kofler JM, Ramirez-Giraldo JC, Qu M, et al. Radiation dose reduction in computed tomography: Techniques and future perspective. Imaging Med. 2009;1(1):65-84. https://doi.org/10.2217/iim.09.5
  2. McCollough CH, Primak AN, Braun N, Kofler J, et al. Strategies for reducing radiation dose in CT. Radiol Clin North Am. 2009;47(1):27-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcl.2008.10.006
  3. Singh S, Kalra MK, Thrall JH, Mahesh M. CT radiation dose reduction by modifying primary factors. J Am Coll Radiol. 2011;8(5):369-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2011.02.001
  4. May MS, Wuest W, Lell MM, Uder M, Kalender WA, Schmidt B. Current strategies for dosage reduction in computed tomography. Radiologe. 2012;52(10):905-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00117-012-2338-8
  5. Lai CWK, Cheung HY, Chan TP, Wong TH. Reducing the radiation dose to the eye lens region during CT brain examination: The potential beneficial effect of the combined use of bolus and a bismuth shield. Radioprotection. 2015;50(3):195-201. https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2015003
  6. Colletti PM, Micheli OA, Lee KH. To shield or not to shield: Application of bismuth breast shields. Am J Roentgenol. 2013;200(3):503-7. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.12.9997
  7. Kim YK, Sung YM, Choi JH, Kim EY, Kim HS. Reduced radiation exposure of the female breast during low-dose chest CT using organ-based tube current modulation and a bismuth shield: Comparison of image quality and radiation dose. Am J Roentgenol. 2013;200(3):537-44. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.12.9237
  8. Hohl C, Wildberger JE, Suss C, Thomas C, Muhlenbruch G, Schmidt T, et al. Radiation dose reduction to breast and thyroid during MDCT: Effectiveness of an in-plane bismuth shield. Acta Radiologica. 2006;47(6):562-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/02841850600702150
  9. Soderberg M, Gunnarsson M. Automatic exposure control in computed tomography: An evaluation of systems from different manufacturers. Acta Radiol. 2010;51:625-34. https://doi.org/10.3109/02841851003698206
  10. Byun JI, Nam YC, Lee H, Shin SB, Han DK. The analysis for the reduction of radiation dose of breast and lens in eyeballs during the CT examination of cranium and chest using Bismuth shields. Journal of Korean Society of Cumputed Tomographic Technology. 2008;10(1):195-201.
  11. Oh HS, Yoo HT, Nam YC, Kim MC, Han DK. The study of dose reduction effect for eyeball and breast and image evaluation when using X-CARE. Journal of Korean Society of Cumputed Tomographic Technology. 2011;13(2):151-60.
  12. Lee K, Lee W, Lee J, Lee B, Oh G. Dose reduction and image quality assessment in MDCT using aeC (D-DOM & Z-DOM) and in-plane bismuth shielding. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2010;141(2):162-7. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncq159
  13. Matsubara K, Koshida K, Noto K, Takata T, Suzuki M, Shimono T, et al. A head phantom study for intraocular dose evaluation of 64-slice multidetector CT examination in patients with suspected cranial trauma. Eur J Radiol. 2011;79(2):283-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.02.002
  14. Perisinakis K, Raissaki M, Theocharopoulos N, Damilakis J, Gourtsoyiannis N. Reduction of eye lens radiation dose by orbital bismuth shielding in pediatric patients undergoing CT of the head: a Monte Carlo study. Med Phys. 2005;32(4):1024-30. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1881852
  15. Cho PG, Kim YH, Choi IJ, Jeong JP, Jang SK. Lee H. Assessment of the eye lens dose reduction by bismuth shields in rando phantom undergoing CT of the head. Journal of Radiological Science and Technology. 2008;31(2):171-5.
  16. Hooper T, Eccles G, Milliken T, Mathieu-Burry JR, Reed W, et al. Dose reduction in CT imaging for facial bone trauma in adults: A narrative literature review. J Med Radiat Sci. 2019;66(2):1-11.
  17. Lee MY, Oh HS, Han DK. CT radiation dose reduction and image quality evaluation in superficial organ: By using bismuth shield and X-care. Journal of Korean Society of Computed Tomographic Technology. 2012;14(2):39-47.
  18. Tawfik HA, Abdelhalim A, Elkafrawy MH. Computed tomography of the orbit-A review and an update. Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology. 2012;26(4):409-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjopt.2012.07.004
  19. U.S. exposure to medical radiation soars, ACR issues new white paper on dosage. Diag Imag Intell Rep. 2007. Available online at: http://www.g2reports.com/issues/DIIR/2007_6/1612608-1.html.
  20. Thomton FJ, Paulson EK, Yoshizumi TT. Single versus multi-detector row CT: Comparison of radiation doses and dose profiles. Acad Radiol. 2003;10:379-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1076-6332(03)80026-0
  21. Colombo P, Pedroli G, Nicoloso M, Re S, Valvassori L, Vanzulli A. Evaluation of the efficacy of a bismuth shield during CT examinations. Radiol Med. 2004;108(5-6):560-8.
  22. Goenka AH, Herts BR, Obuchowski NA, Primak AN, Dong F, Karim W, et al. Effect of reduced radiation exposure and iterative reconstruction on detection of low-contrast low-attenuation lesions in an anthropomorphic liver phantom: An 18-reader study. Radiology. 2014;272(1):154-63. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.14131928
  23. Heaney DE, Norvill CA. A comparison of reduction in CT dose through the use of gantry angulations or bismuth shields. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2006;29(2):172-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03178890
  24. Kalra MK, Dang P, Singh S, Saini S, Shepard JA. In-plane shielding for CT: Effect of off-centering, automatic exposure control and shield-to-surface distance. Korean J Radiol. 2009;10(2):156-63. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2009.10.2.156
  25. Vollmar SV, Kalender WA. Reduction of dose to the female breast in thoracic CT: A comparison of standard-protocol, bismuth-shielded, partial and tube-current-modulated CT examinations. Eur Radiol. 2008;18(8):1674-82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-0934-9
  26. Vorona GA, Zuccoli G, Sutcavage T, Clayton BL, Ceschin RC, Panigrahy A. The use of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction in pediatric head CT: A feasibility study. Am J Neuroradiol. 2013;34(1):205-11. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3122
  27. Owlia M, Yu L, Deible C, Hughes MA, Jovin F, Bump GM. Head CT scan overuse in frequently admitted medical patients. American Journal of Medicine. 2014;127(5):406-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.01.023
  28. Liao YL, Lai NK, Tyan YS, Tsai HY. Bismuth shield affecting CT image quality and radiation dose in adjacent and distant zones relative to shielding surface: A phantom study. Biomedical J. 2019;42(5):343-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bj.2019.04.004
  29. ICRP Publication 103. The 2007 recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection. Ann ICRP. 2007;37(2-4):1-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icrp.2007.11.001
  30. Kim MJ, Kim JH. Radiation exposure and protection for eyes in pain management. Anesth Pain Med. 2017;12:297-305. https://doi.org/10.17085/apm.2017.12.4.297
  31. Hopper KD. Orbital, thyroid, and breast superficial radiation shielding for patients undergoing diagnostic CT. Seminars Ultrasound, CT MRI, 2002;23:423-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0887-2171(02)90013-2
  32. Nikupaavo U, Kaasalainen T, Reijonen V, Ahonen S, Kortesniemi M. Lens dose in routine head CT: Comparison of different optimization methods with anthropomorphic phantoms. AJR. 2015;204:117-23. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.14.12763
  33. Reimann AJ, Davison C, Bjarnason T, Yogesh T, Kryzmyk K, Mayo J, et al. Organ-based computed tomographic (CT) radiation dose reduction to the lenses: Impact on image quality for CT of the head. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2012;36:334-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0b013e318251ec61
  34. Kwak YG, Kim JI, Jeong SP. Research on dose reduction during computed tomography scanning by CARE kV system and bismuth. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association. 2014;14(8):233-42. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2014.14.08.233
  35. Yun JH, Lee KW, Cho YK, Choi JW, Lee JI. Effective dose determination from CT head and neck region. Journal of Radiological Science and Technology. 2011;34(2):105-16.