DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

감성분석을 활용한 사물인터넷(IoT) 서비스 리뷰 분석: 사업자 특성에 따른 차이를 중심으로

An Analysis of IoT Service using Sentiment Analysis on Online Reviews: Focusing on the Characteristics of Service Providers

  • 류민호 (동아대학교 경영정보학과) ;
  • 조호수 (서울대학교 기술경영경제정책전공)
  • 투고 : 2020.04.14
  • 심사 : 2020.07.14
  • 발행 : 2020.10.31

초록

사물인터넷(Internet of Things: IoT)은 다양한 사업자들이 같은 시장을 두고 경쟁하는 분야로, 서비스를 제공하는 사업자들의 주 사업영역 및 특성에 따라 제품의 기능과 성능 등의 차이가 존재한다. 본 논문은 감성분석을 통해 사업자의 특성에 따라 해당 사업자가 제공하는 서비스에 대한 만족도가 달라지는지를 평가한다. 이를 위해, 구글 플레이스토어에 등록된 국내외 사물인터넷 관련 서비스 중 스마트홈, AI스피커, 스마트카 3가지 영역의 총 41개의 애플리케이션에 대한 34,310건의 리뷰를 수집하고 단어 중요도 분석과 감성분석을 실시하였다. 리뷰분석은 키워드 중요도별, 서비스별, 사업자의 기존 사업영역별, 국내외 사업자별 등 다양한 차원에서 수행되었다. 분석결과, 이용자들의 사물인터넷 서비스에 대한 전반적인 평가는 낮은 것으로 파악되었고, 그나마 스마트홈이 다른 서비스 대비 상대적으로 높은 평가를 받았다. 제조업 기반의 사업자와 해외 사업자는 다른 특성의 사업자 대비 만족도가 높았다. 본 연구의 결과를 통해 개별 기업 차원에서 특성에 따른 서비스의 개선점을 찾고, 제품경쟁력을 제고하기 위한 시사점을 제공한다.

The Internet of Things (IoT) is characterized as the market where various companies compete for the same consumers. Thus, there are differences in functions and performance provided by the main business area and other characteristics of the service providers. This paper investigates whether satisfaction with the service provided depends on the characteristics of the operator by using sentiment analysis of comments. To achieve this goal, word importance analysis and sensitivity analysis are conducted on 34,310 reviews of 41 applications registered in the Google Play. The review analysis was conducted at various levels, including TD-IDF (Term frequency-inverse document frequency) value of keywords, service sectors, the origin of providers, and domestic/foreign providers. The results show that users' overall assessment of IoT services was found to be low, and smart homes received relatively high reviews compared to other services, and manufacturing-based and overseas providers received relatively higher evaluations than others.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Adelmann, R., Langheinrich, M., and Floerkemeier, C. (2006). Toolkit for Bar Code Recognition and Resolving on Camera Phones-jump Starting the Internet of Things, Informatik 2006 Workshop on Mobile and Embedded Interactive Systems. Oct, 2-6, Dresden, Germany.
  2. Ashton, K. (2009). That 'Internet of Things' Thing, RFID Jurnal, 22(7), 97-114.
  3. Bandyopadhyay, D., and Sen, J. (2011). Internet of Things: Applications and Challenges in Technology and Standardizationm, Wireless Personal Communications, 58(1), 49-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-011-0288-5
  4. Castillo, A., and Thierer, A. (2015). Projecting the Growth and Economic Impact of the Internet of Things, Available at SSRN 2618794, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2618794.
  5. Chae, S. H., Lim, J. I., and Kang, J. (2015). A Comparative Analysis of Social Commerce and Open Market using User Reviews in Korean Mobile Commerce, Journal of Intelligence and Information Systems, 21(4), 53-77. https://doi.org/10.13088/jiis.2015.21.4.053
  6. Consumer Insight. (2018). 27th Mobile Communication Syndicated Research, Seoul, Consumer Insight.
  7. Dachyar, M., Zagloel, T. Y. M., and Saragih, L. R. (2019). Knowledge Growth and Development: Internet of Things (IoT) Research, 2006-2018, Heliyon, 5(8), e02264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02264
  8. Ebersold, K., and Glass, R. (2015). The Impact of Disruptive Technology: The Internet of Things, Issues in Information Systems, 16(4), pp. 194-201.
  9. Gaul, S., and Ziefle, M. (2009). Smart Home Technologies: Insights into Generation-specific Acceptance Motives, In Symposium of the Austrian HCI and Usability Engineering Group (pp. 312-332), Berlin, Springer.
  10. Ghose, A., and Ipeirotis, P. G. (2010). Estimating the Helpfulness and Economic Impact of Product Reviews: Mining Text and Reviewer Characteristics, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 23(10), 1498-1512. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2010.188
  11. Guerrero-Ibanez, J. A., Zeadally, S., and Contreras-Castillo, J. (2015). Integration Challenges of Intelligent Transportation Systems with Connected Vehicle, Cloud Computing, and Internet of Things Technologies, IEEE Wireless Communications, 22(6), 122-128. https://doi.org/10.1109/MWC.2015.7368833
  12. Hwang, H. J., Shim, H. R., and Choi, J. (2016). Exploration of User Experience Research Method with Big Data Analysis: Focusing on the Online Review Analysis of Echo, Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 16(8), 517-528. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2016.16.08.517
  13. ITU-T (2012). Y.2060: Overview of the Internet of Things, Geneva, International Telecommunication Union.
  14. Jang, H. S. (2018). IoT Era, A Study on the Perception of Consumers in 5 Countries, Trade Focus, 24, 1-21.
  15. Joo, C., and Na, H.. (2015). A Study of Research Trend about Internet of Things, Informatization Policy, 22(3), 3-15. https://doi.org/10.22693/NIAIP.2015.22.3.003
  16. Kim, D., and Cha, K. (2019). Formulating Strategies from Consumer Opinion Analysis on AI Kids Phone using Text Mining, The Journal of Society for e-Business Studies, 24(2), 71-89.
  17. Korea Consumer Agency. (2017). Artificial Intelligence Speakers, Consumer Satisfaction is High, but Need to be Improved, such as Voice Recognition and Dialogue Functions, https://www.kca.go.kr/home/sub.do?menukey=4002&mode=view&no=1002542027 (Accessed on Oct. 8th, 2020)
  18. Kranenburg, R. V., Anzelmo, E., Bassi, A., Caprio, D., Dodson, S., and Ratto, M. (2011). The Internet of Things, 1st Berlin Symposium on Internet and Society, Oct. 25-28, Berlin, Germany, pp. 25-27.
  19. Lee, H., Cho, C., Lee, S., and Keel, Y. (2019). A Study on Consumers Perception of and Use Motivation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Speaker, Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 19(3), 138-154. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2019.19.03.138
  20. Lee, J. H. (2018). Building an SNS Crawling System using Python, Journal of the Korea Industrial Information Systems Research, 23(5), 61-76. https://doi.org/10.9723/JKSIIS.2018.23.5.061
  21. Lee, J. H., and Lee, H. (2015). A Study on Unstructured Text Mining Algorithm through R Programming based on Data Dictionary, Journal of the Korea Industrial Information Systems Research, 20(2), 113-124. https://doi.org/10.9723/jksiis.2015.20.2.113
  22. Li, Y., Hou, M., Liu, H., and Liu, Y. (2012). Towards a Theoretical Framework of Strategic Decision, Supporting Capability and Information Sharing under the Context of Internet of Things, Information Technology and Management, 13(4), 205-216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-012-0121-1
  23. Litwin, M. S. (1995). How to Measure Survey Reliability and Validity (Vol. 7). Sage Publications.
  24. Microsoft (2019). Summary of Research Learnings, IoT Signals, 1-80.
  25. Park, J. S., Hong, S., and Kim, N. R. (2016). A Development Plan for Co-creation-based Smart City through the Trend Analysis of Internet of Things, Journal of the Korea Industrial Information Systems Research, 21(4), 67-78. https://doi.org/10.9723/jksiis.2016.21.4.067
  26. Piryani, R., Madhavi, D., and Singh, V. K. (2017). Analytical Mapping of Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis Research during 2000-2015, Information Processing and Management, 53(1), 122-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2016.07.001
  27. Ramos, J. (2003). Using tf-idf to Determine Word Relevance in Document Queries, Proceedings of the First Instructional Conference on Machine Learning, 242, 133-142.
  28. Roh, M., and Choy, M. (2018). The Effect of Personal Innovativeness on the Adoption of A.I. Speakers: The Moderating Effect of Purse String Control, Journal of Business Research, 33, 195-230.
  29. Sjostrom, O., Holst, D., and Lind, S. O. (1999). Validity of a Questionnaire Survey: the Role of Non-response and Incorrect Answers, Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, 57(5), 242-246. https://doi.org/10.1080/000163599428643
  30. Taherdoost, H. (2016). Validity and Reliability of the Research Instrument; How to Test the Validation of a Questionnaire/Survey in a Research, SSRN Electronic Journal, 5(3), 28-36.
  31. Zanella, A., Bui, N., Castellani, A., Vangelista, L., and Zorzi, M. (2014). Internet of Things for Smart Cities, IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 1(1), 22-32. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2014.2306328