Wind and Structures

  • 제31권2호
  • /
  • Pages.143-152
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 1226-6116(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1598-6225(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Ductility-based design approach of tall buildings under wind loads

  • 투고 : 2019.10.15
  • 심사 : 2020.02.25
  • 발행 : 2020.08.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The wind design of buildings is typically based on strength provisions under ultimate loads. This is unlike the ductility-based approach used in seismic design, which allows inelastic actions to take place in the structure under extreme seismic events. This research investigates the application of a similar concept in wind engineering. In seismic design, the elastic forces resulting from an extreme event of high return period are reduced by a load reduction factor chosen by the designer and accordingly a certain ductility capacity needs to be achieved by the structure. Two reasons have triggered the investigation of this ductility-based concept under wind loads. Firstly, there is a trend in the design codes to increase the return period used in wind design approaching the large return period used in seismic design. Secondly, the structure always possesses a certain level of ductility that the wind design does not benefit from. Many technical issues arise when applying a ductility-based approach under wind loads. The use of reduced design loads will lead to the design of a more flexible structure with larger natural periods. While this might be beneficial for seismic response, it is not necessarily the case for the wind response, where increasing the flexibility is expected to increase the fluctuating response. This particular issue is examined by considering a case study of a sixty-five-story high-rise building previously tested at the Boundary Layer Wind Tunnel Laboratory at the University of Western Ontario using a pressure model. A three-dimensional finite element model is developed for the building. The wind pressures from the tested rigid model are applied to the finite element model and a time history dynamic analysis is conducted. The time history variation of the straining actions on various structure elements of the building are evaluated and decomposed into mean, background and fluctuating components. A reduction factor is applied to the fluctuating components and a modified time history response of the straining actions is calculated. The building components are redesigned under this set of reduced straining actions and its fundamental period is then evaluated. A new set of loads is calculated based on the modified period and is compared to the set of loads associated with the original structure. This is followed by non-linear static pushover analysis conducted individually on each shear wall module after redesigning these walls. The ductility demand of shear walls with reduced cross sections is assessed to justify the application of the load reduction factor "R".

키워드

참고문헌

  1. ACI Committee 318 (1995), Building Code requirements for Structural Concrete: (ACI 318-95); and Commentary (ACI 318R-95). Farmington Hills, MI, American Concrete Institute.
  2. ASCE 41-13 (2013), Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, V.A, U.S.A.
  3. ASCE 7-10 (2010), Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, U.S.A.
  4. Augusti, G. and Ciampoli, M. (2008), "Performance-based design in risk assessment and reduction", Probabilistic Eng. Mech., 23(4), 496-508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2008.01.007.
  5. Bakhshi, A. and Nikhbakht, H. (2011), "Loading pattern and spatial distribution of dynamic wind load and comparison of wind and earthquake effects along the height of tall buildings", Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Structural Dynamics (Eurodyn), Leuven, Belgium, July.
  6. Bashor, R. and Kareem, A. (2007) "Probabilistic performance evaluation of buildings: an occupant comfort perspective", Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Wind Engineering, Cairns, Australia, July.
  7. Bracci, J., Kunnath, S. and Reinhorn, A. (1997), "Seismic performance and retrofit evaluation of reinforced concrete structures", J. Struct. Eng., 123(1), 3-10. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1997)123:1(3)
  8. Ciampoli, M., Petrini, F. and Augusti, G. (2011a), "Performance-based wind engineering: towards a general procedure", Struct. Safety, 33(6), 367-378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2011.07.001.
  9. Computers and Structures Inc. (2015), CSI Analysis Reference Manual, Computers and Structures Inc., Berkeley, U.S.A.
  10. Davenport, A.G. (2007), Wind tunnel testing: a general outline, AG Davenport Wind Engineering Group, University of Western Ontario, Ontario, Canada.
  11. Eurocode 8 (1996), Design Provisions for Earthquake Resistance of Structures, British Standards Institution; London, U.K.
  12. Fajfar, P. and Gaspersic, P. (1996), "The N2 method for the seismic damage analysis of RC buildings", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 25(1), 31-46. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199601)25:1%3C31::AID-EQE534%3E3.0.CO;2-V.
  13. FEMA 273 (1996), NEHRP Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C., U.S.A.
  14. Gani, F. and Legeron, F. (2012), "Relationship between specified ductility and strength demand reduction for single degree-of-freedom systems under extreme wind events", J. Wind Eng. Indus. Aerod., 109, 31-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2012.06.006.
  15. Griffis, L., Patel, V., Muthukumar, S. and Baldava, S. (2012), "A framework for performance-based wind engineering", Advan. Hurricane Eng., 1205-1216. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784412626.105.
  16. Hart, G. and Jain, A. (2014), "Performance-based wind evaluation and strengthening of existing tall concrete buildings in the Los Angeles region: dampers, nonlinear time history analysis and structural reliability", Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build., 23(16), 1256-1274. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1139.
  17. Hart, G.C. and Jain, A. (2013), "Performance based wind design of tall concrete buildings in the Los Angeles region utilizing structural reliability and nonlinear time history analysis", Proceedings of the 12th Americas Conference on Wind Engineering (12ACWE), Seattle, W.A, U.S.A., June.
  18. Ho, T.C.E., Mara, T.G. and Edey, R.T. (2008), "A study of the wind effects for King Abdul Aziz Endowment Hotel Tower, Mecca, Saudi Arabia", Report No. BLWT-SS19-2008, Boundary Layer Wind Tunnel Laboratory, University of Western Ontario, Canada.
  19. Holmes, J.D. (2018), Wind Loading of Structures, CRC Press, Boca Raton, F.L., U.S.A.
  20. Huang, F., Li, Q., Chan, C., Lou, W., Kwok, K. and Li, G. (2015), "Performance-based design optimization of tall concrete framed structures subject to wind excitations", J. Wind Eng., 139, 70-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2015.01.005.
  21. Huang, G. and Chen, X. (2007), "Wind load effects and equivalent static wind loads of tall buildings based on synchronous pressure measurements", Eng. Struct., 29(10), 2641-2653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.01.011.
  22. Jain, A., Srinivasan, M. and Hart, G.C. (2001). "Performance based design extreme wind loads on a tall building", Struct. Des. Tall Build., 10(1), 9-26. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.165.
  23. Judd, J.P. and Charney, F.A. (2014a), "Seismic performance of buildings designed for wind", Proceedings of the Structures Congress, Boston, M.A, U.S.A., April.
  24. Judd, J.P. and Charney, F.A. (2014b), "Earthquake risk analysis of structures", Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Structural Dynamics (Eurodyn), Porto, Portugal, June-July.
  25. Judd, J.P. and Charney, F.A. (2015) "Inelastic behavior and collapse risk for buildings subjected to wind loads", Proceedings of Structures Congress 2015, Portland, O.R., U.S.A., April.
  26. Kareem, A., Spence, S.M.J. and Bernardini, E. (2013), "Performance-based design of wind-excited tall and slender structures", South Bend, IL: NatHaz Modeling Laboratory, Univ. of Notre Dame.
  27. Mohammadi, A. (2016), Wind performance based design for high-rise buildings, Ph.D. Dissertation, FIU Electronic Florida Int. Univ., Miami, F.L., U.S.A.
  28. Muthukumar, S., Baldava, S. and Garber, J. (2013), "Performance-based evaluation of an existing building subjected to wind forces", Proceedings of Advances in Hurricane Engineering: Learning from Our Past, Miami, F.L., U.S.A., October.
  29. Nakai, M., Hirakawa, K., Yamanaka, M., Okuda, H. and Konishi, A. (2013), "Performance-based wind-resistant design for high-rise structures in Japan", Int. J. High-Rise Build., 2(3), 271-283. https://doi.org/10.21022/IJHRB.2013.2.3.271.
  30. NBC (2010), National Building Code of Canada, National Research Council of Canada; Ottawa, Canada.
  31. Oldfield, P. and Trabucco, D. (2014), Roadmap on the Future Research Needs of Tall Buildings, Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat, Chicago, I.L., U.S.A.
  32. Paulotto, C., Ciampoli, M. and Augusti, G. (2004), "Some proposals for a first step towards a performance based wind engineering", Proceedings of the IFED-International Forum in Engineering Decision Making, Stoos, Switzerland.
  33. Saiidi, M., Sozen, M.A. (1981), "Simple nonlinear seismic analysis of R/C structures", J. Struct. Div., ASCE, 107(5), 937-951. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSDEAG.0005714
  34. Spence, S.M.J. and Kareem, A. (2014). "Performance-based design and optimization of uncertain wind-excited dynamic building systems", Eng. Struct., 78, 133-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.07.026.
  35. Spence, S.M.J., Bernardini, E. and Kareem, A. (2015), "A first step towards a general methodology for the performance-based design of wind-excited structures", Proceedings of Structures Congress 2015, Portland, O.R., U.S.A., April.
  36. van de Lindt, J.W. and Dao, T. (2009), "Performance-based wind engineering for wood-frame buildings", J. Struct. Eng., 135(2), 169-177. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2009)135:2(169).