The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

  • 제12권5호
  • /
  • Pages.291-298
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 2005-7806(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-7814(eISSN)
대한치과보철학회 (The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The effect of repeated surface treatment of zirconia on its bond strength to resin cement

  • 투고 : 2020.03.10
  • 심사 : 2020.07.28
  • 발행 : 2020.10.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

PURPOSE. The aim of this study is to evaluate the influence of repeated surface treatments on wettability and surface roughness for zirconia surface and bond strength of zirconia-based ceramics to resin cement. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Seventy blocks (10 × 10 × 3 mm) of zirconia-based ceramics were fabricated and divided into two groups according to the surface treatments: (A) 110 ㎛ Al2O3 airborne-particle abrasion and (R) 110 ㎛ silica modified Al2O3 airborne-particle abrasion. At stage 2, each group was subdivided into 5 groups according to the surface retreatments: (a) 110 ㎛ Al2O3 airborne-particle abrasion, (r) 110 ㎛ silica modified Al2O3 airborne-particle abrasion, (D) diamond bur, (Da) diamond bur + 110 ㎛ Al2O3 airborne-particle abrasion, and (Dr) diamond bur + 110 ㎛ silica modified Al2O3 airborne-particle abrasion. Cylinders of self-adhesive resin cement were cemented onto each treated ceramic surface and subjected to micro-shear bond strength test. Additional specimens were prepared for roughness and wettability analyses. The data were subjected to t-test and One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test (α=.05). RESULTS. At stage 1, group R presented higher bond strength values than group A (P=.000). There was a statistically significant increase of bond strength at stage 2 for group A (P=.003). The diamond bur influenced the surface roughness, increasing the values (P=.023). Group R provided better wettability. Regardless of the applied surface treatment, most of failures were adhesive. CONCLUSION. The combination of application and reapplication of Rocatec Plus showed the best results of bond strength. Surface retreatment and recementation might be an indicated clinical strategy.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Le M, Papia E, Larsson C. The clinical success of tooth- and implant-supported zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses. A systematic review. J Oral Rehabil 2015;42:467-80. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12272
  2. Koenig V, Vanheusden AJ, Le Goff SO, Mainjot AK. Clinical risk factors related to failures with zirconia-based restorations: an up to 9-year retrospective study. J Dent 2013;41:1164-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.10.009
  3. Cantner F, Cacaci C, Mucke T, Randelzhofer P, Hajto J, Beuer F. Clinical performance of tooth- or implant-supported veneered zirconia single crowns: 42-month results. Clin Oral Invest 2019;23:4301-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-02878-0
  4. Pjetursson BE, Sailer I, Makarov NA, Zwahlen M, Thoma DS. All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part II: Multiple-unit FDPs. Dent Mater 2015;31:624-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.02.013
  5. Sailer I, Makarov NA, Thoma DS, Zwahlen M, Pjetursson BE. All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part I: Single crowns (SCs). Dent Mater 2015;31:603-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.02.011
  6. Schmitter M, Mussotter K, Rammelsberg P, Gabbert O, Ohlmann B. Clinical performance of long-span zirconia frameworks for fixed dental prostheses: 5-year results. J Oral Rehabil 2012;39:552-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2012.02311.x
  7. Dogan S, Raigrodski AJ, Zhang H, Mancl LA. Prospective cohort clinical study assessing the 5-year survival and success of anterior maxillary zirconia-based crowns with customized zirconia copings. J Prosthet Dent 2017;117:226-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.07.019
  8. Rinke S, Wehle J, Schulz X, Burgers R, Rodiger M. Prospective evaluation of posterior fixed zirconia dental prostheses: 10-year clinical results. Int J Prosthodont 2018;31:35-42. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.5283
  9. Ortorp A, Kihl ML, Carlsson GE. A 3-year retrospective and clinical follow-up study of zirconia single crowns performed in a private practice. J Dent 2009;37:731-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2009.06.002
  10. St Germain HA Jr, St Germain TH. Shear bond strength of porcelain veneers rebonded to enamel. Oper Dent 2015;40:E112-21. https://doi.org/10.2341/14-123-L
  11. Kern M, Passia N, Sasse M, Yazigi C. Ten-year outcome of zirconia ceramic cantilever resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses and the influence of the reasons for missing incisors. J Dent 2017;65:51-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2017.07.003
  12. Martins ME, Leite FP, Queiroz JR, Vanderlei AD, Reskalla HN, Ozcan M. Does the ultrasonic cleaning medium affect the adhesion of resin cement to feldspathic ceramic?. J Adhes Dent 2012;14:507-9. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a28625
  13. Granell-Ruiz M, Agustin-Panadero R, Fons-Font A, Roman- Rodriguez JL, Sola-Ruiz MF. Influence of bruxism on survival of porcelain laminate veneers. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2014;19:e426-32.
  14. Amaral M, Belli R, Cesar PF, Valandro LF, Petschelt A, Lohbauer U. The potential of novel primers and universal adhesives to bond to zirconia. J Dent 2014;42:90-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.11.004
  15. Sciasci P, Abi-Rached FO, Adabo GL, Baldissara P, Fonseca RG. Effect of surface treatments on the shear bond strength of luting cements to Y-TZP ceramic. J Prosthet Dent 2015;113:212-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.09.012
  16. Akar GC, Pekkan G, Cal E, Eskitascioglu G, Ozcan M. Effects of surface-finishing protocols on the roughness, color change, and translucency of different ceramic systems. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:314-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.09.033
  17. Venturini AB, Prochnow C, Rambo D, Gundel A, Valandro LF. Effect of hydrofluoric acid concentration on resin adhesion to a feldspathic ceramic. J Adhes Dent 2015;17:313-20.
  18. Prado M, Prochnow C, Marchionatti AME, Baldissara P, Valandro LF, Wandscher VF. Ceramic surface treatment with a single-component primer: Resin adhesion to glass ceramics. J Adhes Dent 2018;20:99-105.
  19. Peutzfeldt A, Sahafi A, Flury S. Bonding of restorative materials to dentin with various luting agents. Oper Dent 2011;36:266-73. https://doi.org/10.2341/10-236-L
  20. Qeblawi DM, Campillo-Funollet M, Munoz CA. In vitro shear bond strength of two self-adhesive resin cements to zirconia. J Prosthet Dent 2015;113:122-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.08.006
  21. Wolfart M, Lehmann F, Wolfart S, Kern M. Durability of the resin bond strength to zirconia ceramic after using different surface conditioning methods. Dent Mater 2007;23:45-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.11.040
  22. Ozcan M, Nijhuis H, Valandro LF. Effect of various surface conditioning methods on the adhesion of dual-cure resin cement with MDP functional monomer to zirconia after thermal aging. Dent Mater J 2008;27:99-104. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.27.99
  23. Shahin R, Kern M. Effect of air-abrasion on the retention of zirconia ceramic crowns luted with different cements before and after artificial aging. Dent Mater 2010;26:922-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.06.006
  24. Ali N, Safwat A, Aboushelib M. The effect of fusion sputtering surface treatment on microshear bond strength of zirconia and MDP-containing resin cement. Dent Mater 2019;35:e107-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2019.02.013
  25. Guers P, Wille S, Strunskus T, Polonskyi O, Kern M. Durability of resin bonding to zirconia ceramic after contamination and the use of various cleaning methods. Dent Mater 2019;35:1388-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2019.07.027
  26. Hansen NA, Wille S, Kern M. Effect of reduced airborne-particle abrasion pressure on the retention of zirconia copings resin bonded to titanium abutments. J Prosthet Dent 2020;124:60-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.07.001
  27. Amaral R, Ozcan M, Valandro LF, Balducci I, Bottino MA. Effect of conditioning methods on the microtensile bond strength of phosphate monomer-based cement on zirconia ceramic in dry and aged conditions. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2008;85:1-9.
  28. Chen C, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Effect of an experimental zirconia-silica coating technique on micro tensile bond strength of zirconia in different priming conditions. Dent Mater 2012;28:e127-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.04.020
  29. Amaral R, Ozcan M, Bottino MA, Valandro LF. Microtensile bond strength of a resin cement to glass infiltrated zirconiareinforced ceramic: the effect of surface conditioning. Dent Mater 2006;22:283-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.04.021
  30. Pazinatto FB, Lopes FA, Marquezini Jr L, de Castro FLA, Atta MT. Effect of surface treatments on the spreading velocity of simplified adhesive systems. J Appl Oral Sci 2006;14:393-8. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572006000600002
  31. Yamaguchi H, Ino S, Hamano N, Okada S, Teranaka T. Examination of bond strength and mechanical properties of Y-TZP zirconia ceramics with different surface modifications. Dent Mater J 2012;31:472-80. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2011-237
  32. Cavalcanti AN, Foxton RM, Watson TF, Oliveira MT, Giannini M, Marchi GM. Bond strength of resin cements to a zirconia ceramic with different surface treatments. Oper Dent 2009;34:280-7. https://doi.org/10.2341/08-80
  33. Mahmoodi N, Hooshmand T, Heidari S, Khoshro K. Effect of sandblasting, silica coating, and laser treatment on the microtensile bond strength of a dental zirconia ceramic to resin cements. Lasers Med Sci 2016;31:205-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-015-1848-9
  34. Braga RR, Meira JB, Boaro LC, Xavier TA. Adhesion to tooth structure: a critical review of "macro" test methods. Dent Mater 2010;26:e38-49.