Journal of Hydrogen and New Energy (한국수소및신에너지학회논문집)

The Korean Hydrogen and New Energy Society (한국수소및신에너지학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Damage Range and Impact of On-Site Hydrogen Fueling Station Using Quantitative Risk Assessment Program (Hy-KoRAM)

정량적 위험성평가 프로그램(Hy-KoRAM)을 이용한 제조식 수소충전소 피해범위 및 영향 분석

  • KIM, HYELIM (Hydrogen Research Division, Korea Gas Safety Corporation) ;
  • KANG, SEUNGKYU (Hydrogen Research Division, Korea Gas Safety Corporation)
  • 김혜림 (한국가스안전공사 가스안전연구원) ;
  • 강승규 (한국가스안전공사 가스안전연구원)
  • Received : 2020.08.31
  • Accepted : 2020.10.30
  • Published : 2020.10.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

As the hydrogen industry grows, expansion of infrastructure for hydrogen supply is required, but the safety of hydrogen facilities is concerned due to the recent accidents at the Gangneung hydrogen tank and the Norwegian hydrogen fueling station. In this study, the damage range and impact analysis on the on-site hydrogen fueling station was conducted using Hy-KoRAM. This is a domestically developed program that adds functions based on HyRAM. Through this risk assessment, it was evaluated whether the on-site hydrogen fueling station meets international standards and suggested ways to improve safety.

Keywords

References

  1. K. M. Groth, E. S. Hecht, and J. T. Reynolds, "Methodology for assessing the safety of hydrogen systems: HyRAM 1.0 technical reference manual", Sandia Report, SAND2015-10216, 2015.
  2. B. W. Kang and T. H. Lee, "An investigation of hazard distance in a series of hydrogen jet fire with the hyram tools", Trans. Korean Hydrogen New Energy Soc, Vol. 28, No. 2, 2017, pp. 166-173, doi: https://doi.org/10.7316/KHNES.2017.28.2.166.
  3. S. K. Kang, "A study of jet dispersion and jet-fire characteristics for safety distance of the hydrogen refueling station", Journal of the Korean Institute of Gas, Vol. 23, No. 6, 2019, pp. 74-80, doi: https://doi.org/10.7842/kigas.2019.23.6.74.
  4. "Review of 70MPa hydrogen station technical standards", KHK, Japan, 2012.
  5. Kosha Guide P-102-2013, "Technical guide on accident damage prediction techniques", Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency, 2013. Retrieved from https://www.kosha.or.kr.
  6. IEC 60079-10-1, "Classification of areas-Explosive gas atmospheres", International Electrotechnical Commission, 2015. Retrieved from https://www.iec.ch.
  7. KS C IEC 60079-10-1, "Classification of areas-explosive gas atmospheres", Korean Standards Service Network, 2017.
  8. KGS GC 101, "Classification code for explosive hazardous area on gas facility", Korea Gas Safety Corporation, 2018. Retrieved from https://cyber.kgs.or.kr/codesrc/kgscode_pdf/2018/GC101_180712.pdf.
  9. SAND2009-0874, "Analyses to support development of risk-informed separation distances for hydrogen codes and standards", 2009. Retrieved from https://energy.sandia.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/SAND2009-0874-Analyses-to-Support-Development-of-Risk-Informed-Separation-Distances-for-Hydrogen-Codes-and-Standards.pdf.
  10. SAND2012-10150, "Early-stage quantitative risk assessment to support development of codes and standard requirements for indoor fueling of hydrogen vehicles", 2012.
  11. HID CI5A, "Guidance on ALARP decisions in COMAH, United Kingdom health and safety executive(UK HSE)", 2019.