DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Middle School Science Gifted Students' Perceptions of the Effectiveness of Science Classes Using Science Writing Heuristic

탐구적 과학 글쓰기를 적용한 과학 수업의 효과에 대한 중학교 과학 영재들의 인식

  • Shin, Eunji (Department of Chemistry Education, Sunchon National University) ;
  • Choi, Wonho (Department of Chemistry Education, Sunchon National University)
  • 신은지 (순천대학교 화학교육과) ;
  • 최원호 (순천대학교 화학교육과)
  • Received : 2020.02.24
  • Accepted : 2020.06.05
  • Published : 2020.09.28

Abstract

In this study, four gifted students in the second year of middle school at Gifted Education Center of the National University in Jeollanam-do were surveyed students' perceptions of the effectiveness of science class using science writing heuristic in terms of metacognition and the goals of the 2015 revised science curriculum. Through questionnaires and interviews with gifted science students, science gifted students recognized that the science class using science writing heuristic had a positive effect on the four subdomains (planning, monitoring, control, and evaluation) of metacognition. For this reason, the science gifted students presented self-directed experience in designing experiments, continually checking the collected experimental data, feedback process, and reflecting experience in preparing conclusions. Science gifted students recognized that science class using science writing heuristic had a positive effect on the goals of the 2015 revised science curriculum(attitudes, inquiry, knowledge, Science·Technology·Society(STS), and the enjoyment and usefulness of science learning) that correspond to through inquiry science writing lessons. For this reason, the science gifted students presented self-directed inquiry experiences, continual inquiry experiences on the same subject, thinking process at each stage of inquiry, learning experiences through inquiry, experience of the whole inquiry process, and inquiry of phenomena closely related to real life. Therefore, for the effective science class, it is necessary to apply the characteristics of science class using science writing heuristic which is responded by science gifted students to general science class as well as science gifted class later.

이 연구에서는 전라남도 소재의 국립대학교 과학영재교육원 소속 중학교 2학년 4명의 영재 학생을 대상으로 탐구적 과학 글쓰기 수업을 적용한 과학 수업의 효과에 대한 학생들의 인식을 메타인지와 2015개정 과학과 교육과정의 목표의 관점에서 조사하였다. 과학 영재 학생들 대상의 설문과 면담을 통해, 과학 영재 학생들은 탐구적 과학 글쓰기를 적용한 과학 수업을 통해 메타인지의 계획, 모니터, 조절, 평가 네 가지 하위 영역에서 긍정적인 영향을 주었다고 인식하고 있었다. 그 이유로 과학 영재학생들은 자기주도적으로 실험을 설계하는 경험, 수집한 실험 자료를 지속적으로 점검하는 활동, 피드백 과정, 결론을 작성하는 과정에서 반성 경험 등을 제시하였다. 과학 영재 학생들은 탐구적 과학 글쓰기를 적용한 과학 수업을 통해 2015 개정 과학과 교육과정의 목표에 해당하는 태도, 탐구, 지식, 과학·기술·사회(STS), 과학학습의 즐거움과 유용성 영역에서 긍정적 인식을 가지고 있었다. 그 이유로 과학 영재 학생들은 자기주도적으로 탐구를 진행하는 경험, 동일한 주제의 연속적 실험 경험, 각 탐구의 단계에서 사고하는 과정, 탐구과정에서 학습하는 경험, 탐구의 전 과정 경험, 실생활과 밀접한 현상에 대한 탐구 등을 제시하였다. 따라서 효과적인 과학 수업을 위하여 과학 영재 학생들이 응답한 탐구적 과학 글쓰기를 적용한 과학 수업의 특징을 추후 과학 영재 수업뿐만 아니라 일반 학교 과학 수업에도 적용할 필요가 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Renzulli, J. S.; Delcourt, M. A. B. Gifted Child Quarterly 1986, 30, 20. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698628603000104
  2. Shim, K. C.; So, K. H.; Kim, H. S.; Chang, N. K. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education 2001, 21, 122.
  3. Kang, S. J.; Kim, E. H.; Yoon, J. H. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education 2012, 22, 353. https://doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2012.22.2.353
  4. Jeong, S. Y.; Jeong, E. Y. Journal of Science Education for the Gifted 2018, 10, 171.
  5. Lee, H. R. The Journal of The Korean Earth Science Society 2011, 32, 294. https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2011.32.3.294
  6. Cho, E. B.; Paik, S. H. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education 2006, 26, 307.
  7. Cho, H. C.; Yu, S. C. The Journal of the Korean Society for Gifted and Talented 2011, 10, 97.
  8. Yang, E.; Bae, M.; Han, K.; Park, I. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education 2003, 23, 531.
  9. Lee, J. A.; Park, S. K.; Kim, Y. M. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education 2008, 21, 773. https://doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2011.21.3.773
  10. Stenberg, R. J. A three-Facet model of creativity. In The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives; Stenberg, R. J., Ed.; Cambridge University Press: MA, 1998.
  11. Shin, M. R.; Seo, H. A. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education 2017, 27, 367. https://doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2017.27.3.367
  12. Kim, S. S. The Journal of the Korean Society for Gifted and Talented 2010, 9, 37.
  13. Ju, M. N.; Kim, H. J. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education 2013, 33, 425. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2013.33.2.425
  14. Gagne, F. Constructs and models pertaining to exceptional human ability; Heller. K. A., F. J. Monks & A. H. Passow Eds.; International handbook of research and development of giftness and talented: 1993.
  15. Ministry of Education and Science Technology. National Curriculum of Science 2009.
  16. Ministry of Education and Human Resources Development. National Curriculum of Science 2015.
  17. Kim, S. K.; Choi, W. H. School Science Journal 2019, 13, 45. https://doi.org/10.15737/SSJ.13.1.201902.45
  18. Moon, S. B.; Choi, W. H. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society 2018, 62, 398. https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2018.62.5.398
  19. Park, S. H.; Chung Y. L. Biology Education 2012, 40, 367. https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2012.40.3.367
  20. Lee, E. K.; Kang, S. J. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education 2006, 32, 537.
  21. Shin, S.; Choi, A.; Park, J. ournal of the Korean Association for Science Education 2013, 33, 952. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2013.33.5.952
  22. Kim, M.; Kim, S.; Noh, T.; Choi, S. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education 2019, 39, 791. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2019.39.6.791
  23. Schwartz, R. S.; Lederman, N. G.; Crawford, B. Science Education 2004, 88, 610. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10128
  24. Keys, C. W.; Hand, B.; Prain, V.; Collons, S. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1999, 36, 1065. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199912)36:10<1065::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-I
  25. Burke, K. A., Greenbows, T. J.; Hand, B. M. Journal of Chemical Education 2006, 83, 1032. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed083p1032
  26. Flavell, J. H. American Psychologist 1979, 34, 906. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
  27. Garofalo, J.; Lester, F. K. Journal for Research in mathematics Education 1985, 16, 163. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.16.3.0163
  28. Kim, S. O. Analysis of Metacognition, Self-efficacy and Perceptions of Constructivist Learning Environment on Science of Middle and High school Students. Master's Thesis, Ewha Womans University 2011.
  29. Jang, M. D. A Microgenetic analysis of effects on metacognitive exercise of evaluating other children's experimental processes for the development of scientific reasoning. Doctor's Thesis, Korea National University of Education 2001.
  30. Lee, E. J. A study of direct teaching strategy of inquiry skills applying meta-cognition. Doctor's Thesis, Ewha Womans University 2010.
  31. Hong, E. Roeper Review, 1999, 21, 244. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199909553971
  32. Kim, S. Y.; You, S. M. Biology Education 2012, 40, 304. https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2012.40.3.304
  33. Jung, J. E.; Chung, Y. R. Biology Education 2013, 41, 310. https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2013.41.2.310
  34. Hwang, Y. H.; Park, J. S. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education 2010, 20, 847.
  35. Son, J. W.; Jeong, E. J. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction 2013, 17, 709. https://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2013.17.3.709
  36. Yun, J.; Choi, W. Journal of Science Education for the Gifted 2019, 11, 59.