Journal of Digital Convergence (디지털융복합연구)

The Society of Digital Policy and Management (한국디지털정책학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects on Preventive Behavior Intention to Particulate Matter by Risk Perception Attitude and Anxiety : Focus on Adoption of RPA Model

위험인식태도와 불안이 미세먼지 예방행동의도에 미치는 영향: RPA모델 적용을 중심으로

  • 고두희 (성균관대학교 미디어커뮤니케이션학과) ;
  • 송해룡 (성균관대학교 미디어커뮤니케이션학과)
  • Received : 2020.08.07
  • Accepted : 2020.10.20
  • Published : 2020.10.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study aimed to understand the effects on preventive behavior intention to particulate matter by risk perception attitude and anxiety. Also, to expand applicable target and range of RPA model, add anxiety. To measure main variables of RPA model, did a survey with 570 college students. With a data, analyzed by correlation, one-way ANOVA and three-way ANOVA. As a result, perceived risk and efficacy effect on intention to preventive action and information seeking. And an anxiety factor effects on intention to preventive action and information seeking also. And distinguished 4 groups of RPA model, there were meaningful differences between intention to preventive action and information seeking by groups, and a factor of anxiety effects certain groups. As a result, it can suggest how to plan and enforce message on preventive campaign of particulate matter. In follow research, with social psychological factors, it will helpful to identify health activities about particulate matters.

본 연구는 미세먼지에 대한 위험인식태도와 불안이 미세먼지 예방행동의도에 미치는 영향을 확인하는 것을 목적으로 했다. 또한, 위험인식태도모델(RPA)의 적용대상과 범위를 확장하기 위해서 불안 변인을 추가하였다. 570명의 대학생을 대상으로 진행한 설문조사를 진행하였으며, 수집된 자료를 바탕으로 상관관계분석 및 일원배치분산분석, 삼원변량분석을 진행하였다. 분석 결과, 미세먼지에 대한 지각된 위험과 효능감이 예방행동의도와 정보추구의도에 통계적으로 유의미 한 것으로 나타났다. 불안도 예방행동의도와 정보추구에 유의미하게 영향을 주는 것으로 나타났다. RPA 모델의4 태도집단으로 구분하여 분석한 결과, 각 집단별로 예방행동의도와 정보추구의도에서 유의미한 차이를 보였으며, 불안요인이 일부 태도집단에 유의미한 영향을 주는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구결과는 미세먼지 예방캠페인에서 태도집단에 맞는 메시지의 계획과 실행이 필요함을 시사한다. 후속 연구에서 사회심리학 변인 등의 영향을 고려한다면, 미세먼지 관련 건강행동을 파악하는데 도움이 될 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. D. H. Chung. (2019). Determinants of Preventive Behavior Intention to the Particulate Matter: An Application of the Expansion of Health Belief Model. Journal of Digital Convergence, 17(8), 471-479. DOI: 10.14400/JDC.2019.17.8.471
  2. Y. W. Kim, H. S. Lee, Y. J. Jang & H. J. Lee. (2015). How does media construct particulate matter risks?: A news frame and source analysis on particulate matter risks. Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies, 59(2), 121-154.
  3. G. A. Wellenius, M. R. Burger, B. A. Coull, J. Schwartz, H. H. Suh, P. Koutrakis, & M. A. Mittleman. (2012). Ambient air pollution and the risk of acute ischemic stroke. Archives of internal medicine, 172(3), 229-234. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2011.732
  4. W. Y. Shi, Y. Zhang, P. Du, C. Chen, J. N. Wang, J. L, Fang, & S. Tang. (2019). Association of ambient fine particulate matters with anxiety in middle-aged and elderly people. Zhonghua yu Fang yi xue za zhi(Chinese Journal of Preventive Medicine), 53(1), 71-75.
  5. P. Fu, X. Guo, F. M. H. Cheung, & K. K. L. Yung. (2019). The association between PM2. 5 exposure and neurological disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Science of the Total Environment, 655, 1240-1248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.218
  6. Y. W. Kim, H. S. Lee, H. J. Lee & Y. J. Jang. (2015). A study of the public's perception and opinion formation on particulate matter risk: Focusing on the moderating effects of the perceptions toward promotional news and involvement. Korean Journal of Communication & Information, 72(4), 52-91.
  7. R. N. Rimal, & K. Real. (2003). Perceived Risk and Efficacy Beliefs as Motivators of Change: Use of the Risk Perception Attitude(RPA) Framework to Understand Health Behaviors. Human Communication Research, 29(3), 370-399. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/29.3.370
  8. S. E. Jo, & S. W. Yoo. (2011). A Study on the Effects of Risk Perception Attitudes and Subjective Norm on the Preventive Behaviors of Cervical Cancer: Testing RPA Framework on Korean College Women. Journal of Public Relations Research, 15(1), 58-98. DOI: 10.15814/jpr.2011.15.1.58
  9. S. A. Rains, M. D. Hingle, M. Surdeanu, D. Bell, & S. Kobourov. (2019). A test of the risk perception attitude framework as a message tailoring strategy to promote diabetes screening. Health Communication, 34(6), 672-679. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2018.1431024
  10. J. E. Grunig. (1989). Publics, audiences and market segments: Models of receivers of campaign messages. Information campaigns: Managing the process of social change, 197-226.
  11. K. Witte. (1992). Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended Parallel process model. Communication Monographs, 59, 225-249. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759209376276
  12. K. Witte. (1994). Fear control and danger control: A test of the Extended Parallel Process Model(EPPM). Communication Monographs, 61, 113-134. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759409376328
  13. R. N. Rimal, & R. Limaye. (2013). Socio-cognitive approaches for AIDS prevention: explicating the role of risk perception and efficacy beliefs in Malawi. Public Communication Campaigns. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc, 245-258.
  14. R. N. Rimal. (2001). Perceived Risk and Self-Efficacy as Motivators: Understanding Individuals' Long-Term Use of Health Information. Journal of Communication, December 2001.
  15. S. A. Rains, M. D. Hingle, M. Surdeanu, D. Bell, & S. Kobourov. (2018). A test of the risk perception attitude framework as a message tailoring strategy to promote diabetes screening. Health communication, 34(6), 672-679.
  16. E. Pask, & S. T. Rawlins. (2016). Men's Intentions to Engage in Behaviors to Protect Against Human Papillomavirus (HPV): Testing the Risk Perception Attitude Framework, Health Communication, 31(2), 139-149. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2014.940670
  17. R. N. Rimal, K. Bose, J. Brown, G. Mkandawire, & L. Folda. (2009). Extending the Purview of the Risk Perception Attitude Framework: Findings from HIV/AIDS Prevention Research in Malawi. Health Communication, 24, 210-218. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410230902804109
  18. R. N. Rimal, & H. S. Juon. (2010). Use of the risk perception attitude framework for promoting breast cancer prevention. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(2), 287-310. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00574.x
  19. M. M. Turner, R. N. Rimal, D. Morrison, & H. Kim. (2006). The Role of Anxiety in Seeking and Retaining Risk Information: Testing the Risk Perception Attitude Framework in Two Studies. Human Communication Research, 32, 130-156. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2006.00006.x
  20. Rimal, R. N., J. A. Flora, & C. Schooler. (1999). Achieving improvements in overall health orientation: Effects of campaign exposure, information seeking, and health media use. Communication Research, 26, 322-348. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365099026003003
  21. H. Song, & W. Kim. (2014). A Study of Communication Behavior on Public's Environmental Risk : Focused on Global Warming. Speech and communication, 23, 273-309.
  22. J. K. Maner, & N. B. Schmidt. (2006). The role of risk avoidance in anxiety. Behavior therapy, 37, 181-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2005.11.003
  23. K. J. Lee, B. S. Jin, Y. S. Choi, & J. S. Han. (2017). The effects of types of cognitive risk perception of tuberculosis on issue salience, information-seeking, and preventive behavioral intention. The Korean Journal of Advertising and Public Relations, 19(4), 64-107. DOI: 10.16914/kjapr.2017.19.4.64
  24. S. Patel.. (2013). An extension of the Risk Perception Attitude (RPA) framework: Examining the relationships between thinking style, locus of control, anxiety, and information seeking (Doctoral dissertation).
  25. Ministry of Environment (2018). Knowing particulate matter, public relations brochure.
  26. R. J. Griffin, S. Dunwoody, & K. Neuwirth. (1999). Proposed model of the relationship of risk information seeking and processing to the development of preventive behaviors. Environmental Research, 80(2), 230-245.