융합정보논문지 (Journal of Convergence for Information Technology)

중소기업융합학회 (Convergence Society for SMB)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

대학수학의 메이커수업 요인이 대학생의 수학에 대한 흥미와 태도에 미치는 영향

The Effects of Maker Class Factors in University on Interest in Mathematics and Attitude to Mathematics

  • 김동률 (동명대학교 메카트로닉스공학부)
  • Kim, Dong-Ryool (Division of Mechatronics Engineering, Tongmyoung University)
  • 투고 : 2020.08.31
  • 심사 : 2020.10.20
  • 발행 : 2020.10.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구에서는 대학수학 메이커수업 특성의 요인인 강사역량, 교육프로그램, 교육서비스, 물리적 교육환경 요인과 대학생들의 수학에 대한 흥미 및 태도 간의 영향관계를 검증하는 것을 목적으로 하였다. 부산권 소재 대학교에 재학 중인 이공계열 남녀 대학생 228명을 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하였고, SPSS 26.0 프로그램을 활용하여 실증분석을 수행하였다. 연구결과 첫째, 대학수학 메이커수업 특성 요인 중 강사역량(β=.349, t=6.380, p<.001), 교육프로그램(β=.361, t=5.650, p<.001), 물리적 교육환경(β=.196, t=3.281, p<.01) 요인이 대학생의 수학에 대한 흥미에 유의미한 정(+)의 영향을 미쳤다. 둘째, 대학수학 메이커수업에 대한 흥미(β=.349, t=6.380, p<.001) 요인은 대학생의 수학에 대한 태도에 유의미한 정(+)의 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 셋째, 대학수학 메이커수업 특성 요인 중 강사역량(β=.340, t=6.365, p<.001), 교육프로그램(β=.352, t=5.559, p<.001), 물리적 교육환경(β=.226, t=3.537, p<.01) 요인이 대학생의 수학에 대한 태도에 유의미한 정(+)의 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구의 결과를 통해 대학수학 메이커수업의 교육프로그램 수준과 강사역량이 높고, 물리적 교육환경이 뛰어날 때, 대학생의 수학에 대한 태도 뿐 아니라 궁극적으로 수학에 대한 태도에도 긍정적인 영향을 미칠 수 있다는 결론에 도달하였다.

In this study, the objective of this study is to verify the effects between lecturer's capability, education program, education service, and physical educational environment factors, and university students' interest in and attitude toward mathematics. A survey was conducted on 228 male and female students in science and engineering majors attending universities in the Pusan metropolitan area, and empirical analysis was conducted using the SPSS 26.0 program. The research results are as follows. First, among the characteristics of college mathematics maker classes, instructor competency (β=.349, t=6.380, p<.001), educational program (β=.361, t=5.650, p<.001), and physical educational environment (β=.196, t=3.281, p<.01) had a significant positive (+) effect on college students' interest in mathematics. Second, the factors of interest (β=.349, t=6.380, p<.001) in college mathematics maker classes were found to have a significant positive (+) effect on college students' attitudes toward mathematics. Third, among the characteristics of college mathematics maker classes, instructor competency (β=.340, t=6.365, p<.001), educational program (β=.352, t=5.559, p<.001), physical educational environment (β=.226, t=3.537, p<.01) was found to have a significant positive (+) effect on college students' attitudes toward mathematics. Through the results of this study, it was concluded that when the level of education program and teaching ability of the university mathematics maker class are high and the physical educational environment is excellent, it can have a positive effect not only on the university student's attitude towards mathematics but ultimately on the attitude of mathematics.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. K. Schwab & R. Samans. (2016, January). The future of jobs: Employment, skills and workforce strategy for the fourth industrial revolution. In World Economic Forum (pp. 1-32).
  2. H. Bonin, T. Gregory. & U. Zierahn. (2015). Ubertragung der Studie von Frey/Osborne (2013) auf Deutschland (Kurzexpertise No. 57). Berlin: Bundesministerium fur Arbeit und Soziales.
  3. S. Y. Kim. (2016), A study on the suggestion strategy of achievement standards for the competency based curriculum, EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 66, 1-28.
  4. J. Y. Yoon & J. D. Ohn. (2016), Exploration of the Direction of Competency-based Curriculum Design in Terms of the Holistic Nature of Competency, The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 34(2), 19-45.
  5. S. Mitra. (2014). The future of schooling: Children and learning at the edge of chaos. Prospects, 44(4), 547-558. DOI : 10.1007/s11125-014-9327-9
  6. I. A. Kang, Y. S. Kim & H. J. Yoon. (2017). Fostering Entrepreneurship by Maker Education : A Case Study in an Higher Education. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 8(7), 23-35. DOI : 10.15207/JKCS.2017.8.7.253
  7. Y. E. Ryu ＆ I. A. Kang. (2018). Development of Emotional Intelligence through A Maker Education Program Based on Design Thinking Process for Undergraduate Students in an University. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 9(7), 163-175. DOI : 10.15207/JKCS.2018.9.7.163
  8. Y. S. Kang & Y. S. Kim. (2019). A Case of Operating College Mathematics Course using SRN, The Korean School Mathematics Society. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society, 22(3), 277-302. DOI : 10.30807/ksms.2019.22.3.006
  9. S. K. Shim & A. Y. Ko. (2019). A Study on the Improvement of College General Mathematics by Changes of Higher Education Environment. Koreaa Journal of General Education, 13(4), 143-160.
  10. J. O. Kim & J. Kim. (2018). Design and Implementation of Convergence Artworks Using Open Source Hardware for STEAM Education. Journal of Adv Research in Dynamical & Control Systems, 10(1), 55-58.
  11. J. O. Kim, T. W. Lee, J. S. Kim, H. S. Chung & E. Y. Jeong. (2019). Job Analysis of Teachers for Maker Education using the DACUM Method. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 19(8), 1159-1181. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2019.19.8.1159
  12. Ministry of Education. (2015). Mathematics Curriculum
  13. J. H. Kim. (2019). Exploring of the Maker Education in Graduate School. Asia-pacific Journal of Multimedia Services Convergent with Art, Humanities, and Sociology, 9(4), 1-10.
  14. D. Dougherty, (2012) The maker movement. Innovations: Technology, governance, globalization, 7(3), 11-14. https://doi.org/10.1162/INOV_a_00135
  15. P. Blikstein. (2013), Digital favrication and 'making' in education: The democratization of invention. fablabs: of machines, makers and inventor, Transcript Publishers.
  16. S. L. Martinez & G. Stager. (2013). Invent to learn: Making, tinkering, and engineering in the class. Constructing Modern Knowledge Press Publisher, CA.
  17. H. J. Yoon, I. A. Kang, E. S. Kang. (2019). A Case Study of a Maker Education Outreach Program: Fostering Maker Mindsets. Journal of Educational Technology, 35(2), 365-393. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.35.2.365
  18. Korea Science Foundation. (2016). Research on ways to activate the maker movement. Seoul: Korea Science Foundation.
  19. J. R. Lee. (2015). A Study on Desirable Management of College Mathematics through the Change of Mathematics Recognition in Engineering Freshmen. E-Mathematics Education Journal, 29(3), 513-532. DOI : 10.7468/jksmee.2015.29.3.513
  20. Y. G. Lee. (2016). A Study on Learning Style of Level-Differentiated College Mathematics Classes: Focusing on College of Engineering Students. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, 17(3), 373-379. DOI : 10.5762/KAIS.2016.17.3.373
  21. B. H. Kim, J. W. Kim, J. Y. Kim. (2017). On freshmen's academic achievements of college mathematics and the efficient methods of education. E-Mathematics Education Journal, 31(1), 1-15. DOI : 10.7468/jksmee.2017.31.1.1
  22. H. H. Kim et al. (2019). On Developments of Teaching-Learning Contents and Constructivist Teaching Methods Using Mobile Applications Based on Augmented Reality in Mathematics Education. E-Mathematics Education Journal, 33(3), 207-229. DOI : 10.7468/jksmee.2019.33.3.207
  23. William Tyler. (1973). Child on Organizational Structure. Sage journals, 7(1), 125-126
  24. S. H. Park. (2010). A study on how to improve the defining characteristics of mathematics. Korea Curriculum Evaluation Institute.
  25. M. S. Hannula. (2002). Atitude toward mathematics: Emotions, expectations and alues. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49(1), 25-46. DOI : 10.1023/A:1016048823497
  26. P. D. Eggen & D. Kauchak. (2001). Educational psychology(Vol. 403). Prentice hall.
  27. S. T. Kim (2017). Effects of smart learning mathematics class on academic achievement, mathematical interest and attitude. Thesis for Yonsei University Graduate School of Education, Seoul.
  28. J. F. Herbart. (1806). Al lgemeine padagogik aus zueck der erziebung abgeleiter.
  29. M. S. Yoon. (2006). Relationships among Parental Involvement in Education, Subject-specific Interests, and Academic Achievement. The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, 18(2), 139-15.
  30. K. Peppler, E. Halverson & Y. B. Kafai, Makeology. (2016). Maker spaces as learning environments(Vol. 1). Routledge.
  31. Y. S. Kim. (2017). A study on developing the entrepreneurship through maker education in higher education. Ph. D. dissertation. Kyung Hee University, Seoul.
  32. C. K. Park. (2015). The Effect of Teaching Using Peer Instruction on Mathematical Interest of High School Student. Major in Educational Psychology Graduate School of Education Korea National University of Education Chung-Buk.
  33. K. A. Kim. (2010), Relationship among teachers' Mathematics T eaching efficacy, students' A cademic self-efficacy and Mathem atical interests and attitudes. Master's Thesis, Graduate School, Konkuk University, Seoul.
  34. Y. S. Han. (2017). Mathematical Self-Efficacy, Change in Interest and Attitude after Middle School Mathematics Club Activities with the Mathematics Gifted Program. Master's Thesis, Graduate School, Korea University, Seoul.