DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Influence of time-varying attenuation effect of damage index on seismic fragility of bridge

  • Yan, Jialei (School of Civil Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology) ;
  • Liang, Yan (School of Civil Engineering, Zhengzhou University) ;
  • Zhao, Boyang (School of Civil Engineering, Zhengzhou University) ;
  • Qian, Weixin (School of Architecture, Harbin Institute of Technology) ;
  • Chen, Huai (School of Civil Engineering, Zhengzhou University)
  • Received : 2020.08.07
  • Accepted : 2020.10.19
  • Published : 2020.10.25

Abstract

Fragility as one of the most effective methods to evaluate seismic performance, which is greatly affected by damage index. Taking a multi span continuous rigid frame offshore bridge as an example. Based on fragility and reliability theory, considering coupling effect of time-varying durability damage of materials and time-varying attenuation effect of damage index to analyze seismic performance of offshore bridges. Results show that IDA curve considering time-varying damage index is obviously below that without considering; area enclosed by IDA of 1# pier and X-axis under No.1 earthquake considering this effect is 96% of that without considering. Area enclosed by damage index of 1# pier and X-axis under serious damage with considering time-varying damage index is 90% of that without considering in service period. Time-varying damage index has a greater impact on short pier when ground motion intensity is small, while it has a great impact on high pier when the intensity is large. The area enclosed by fragility of bridge system and X-axis under complete destruction considering time-varying damage index is 165% of that without considering when reach designed service life. Therefore, time-varying attenuation effect of damage index has a great impact on seismic performance of bridge in service period.

Keywords

References

  1. Abyani, M., Bahaari, M.R., Zarrin, M. and Nasseri, M. (2019), "Effects of sample size of ground motions on seismic fragility analysis of offshore jacket platforms using Genetic Algorithm", Ocean Eng., 189(1), 106326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106326.
  2. Bayat, M., Daneshjoo, F. and Nistico, N. (2015), "Probabilistic sensitivity analysis of multi-span highway bridges", Steel Compos. Struct., 237-262. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2015.19.1.237.
  3. CECS 220-2007 (2007), Standard for durability assessment of concrete structures. China Building Industry Press, Beijing, China.
  4. Chen, Z.P. and Liu, X. (2018), "Seismic behavior of steel reinforced concrete cross-shaped column under combined torsion", Steel Compos. Struct., 407-420. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2018.26.4.407
  5. Ditlevsen, Ove. (1979), "Narrow Reliability Bounds for Structural Systems", J. Struct. Mech., 7(4), 453-472. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601217908905329.
  6. Filippou, F.C., Popov, E.P. and Bertero, V.V. (1983), Effects of Bond Deterioration on Hysteretic Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Joints, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, California, America.
  7. Fu, R.R., Liu, K.N. and Men, G.C. (2016), "Study on the Bearing Capacity and Influence Factors of Concrete Columns with Reinforcing Steel Bars in Core", Key Eng. Mater., 723, 731-735. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.723.731.
  8. Gao, W., Chen, X. and Chen, D.L. (2019), "Genetic programming approach for predicting service life of tunnel structures subject to chloride-induced corrosion", J Advan. Res., 20, 141-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2019.07.001.
  9. Huang, B., Yang, Z.Y., Zhu, B., Zhang, J.W., Kang, A.Z. and Pan, L. (2019), "Vulnerability assessment of coastal bridge superstructure with box girder under solitary wave forces through experimental study", Ocean Eng., 189(1), 106337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106337.
  10. Hunter, D. (1976), "An Upper Bound for the Probability of a Union", J. Appl. Probab., 13(3), 597-603. https://doi.org/10.2307/3212481.
  11. Hwang, H., Liu, J.B. and Chiu, Y.H. (2001), "Seismic fragility analysis of highway bridges", Referenzmodellierung. http://hdl.handle.net/2142/9267.
  12. JTG/T B02-01-2008 (2008), Guidelines for Seismic Design of Highway Bridges. Industry standard-Transportation (CN-JT); Beijing, China.
  13. JTJ 004-1989 (1989), Specifications of Earthquake Resistant Design for Highway Engineering. Ministry of communications highway planning and Design Institute, Beijing, China.
  14. Kent, D.C. and Park, R. (1971), "Flexural members with confined concrete", J. Struct. Div., 97(7), 1969-1990. http://cedb.asce.org/cgi/WWWdisplay.cgi?18246. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSDEAG.0002957
  15. Li, L.F., Huang, J.M., Wu, W.P. and Wang, L.H. (2012), "Research on the seismic performance of bridge with high piers and long spans using Incremental Dynamic Analysis", J. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib., 32(1), 68-77.
  16. Liang, Y., Yan, J.L. and Wang, J.L. (2019), "Analysis on the Time-Varying Fragility of Offshore Concrete Bridge", Complexity. 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2739212.
  17. Liang, Y., Yan, J.L., Cheng, Z.Q. and Ren, C. (2020), "Timevarying seismic fragility analysis of offshore bridges with continuous rigid frame girder under main aftershock sequences", J. Bridge Eng., 25(8), 04020055. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001578.
  18. Nielson, B. (2005), "Analytical fragility curves for highway bridges in moderate seismic zones", Atlanta, Georgia Institute of Technology. http://hdl.handle.net/1853/7542.
  19. Ou, Y.C., Fan, H.D. and Nguyen, N.D. (2013), "Long-term seismic performance of reinforced concrete bridges under steel reinforcement corrosion due to chloride attack", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 42(14), 2113-2127. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2316.
  20. Ou, Y.C., Susanto, Y.T.T. and Roh, H. (2016), "Tensile behavior of naturally and artificially corroded steel bars", Construct. Build. Mater., 103(1), 93-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.075.
  21. Ou, Y.C., Tsai, L.L. and Chen, H.H. (2012), "Cyclic performance of large-scale corroded reinforced concrete beams", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 41(4), 593-604. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1145.
  22. Porter, K., Kennedy, R. and Bachman, R. (2007), "Creating fragility functions for performance-based earthquake engineering", Earthq. Spectra. 23(2), 471-489. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2720892.
  23. Ranjkesh, S.H., Asadi, P. and Hamadani, A.Z. (2019), "Seismic collapse assessment of deteriorating RC bridges under multiple hazards during their life-cycle", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 17, 5045-5072. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00647-8.
  24. Shekhar, S., Ghosh, J. and Ghosh, S. (2020), "Impact of design code evolution on failure mechanism and seismic fragility of highway bridge piers", J. Bridge Eng., 25(2), 04019140. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001518.
  25. Shen, X., Liu, Q.F. and Hu, Z. (2019), "Combine ingress of chloride and carbonation in marine-exposed concrete under unsaturated environment: A numerical study", Ocean Eng., 189, 106350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106350.
  26. Song, Y.P., Song, L.Y. and Zhao, G.F. (2004), "Factors affecting corrosion and approaches for improving durability of ocean reinforced concrete structures", Ocean Eng., 31(5-6), 779-789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2003.07.006.
  27. Sung, Y.C. and Su, C.K. (2011), "Time-dependent seismic fragility curves on optimal retrofitting of neutralised reinforced concrete bridges", Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., 7(10), 797-805. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732470902989720.
  28. Tian, T., Qiu, W.L. and Zhang, Z. (2018), "Seismic behavior of steel tube reinforced concrete bridge columns", Steel Compos. Struct., 63-71. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2018.28.1.063.
  29. Tu, B., Dong, Y. and Fang, Z. (2019), "Time-dependent reliability and redundancy of corroded prestressed concrete bridges at material, component, and system levels", ASCE J. Bridge Eng., 24(9), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001461.
  30. Vidal, T., Castel, A. and Francois, R. (2004), "Analyzing crack width to predict corrosion in reinforced concrete", Cement Concrete Res., 34(1), 165-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(03)00246-1.
  31. Vu, K.A.T. and Stewart, M.G. (2005), "Predicting the likelihood and extent of reinforced concrete corrosion-induced cracking", ASCE J Struct. Eng., 131(11), 1681-1689. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:11(1681).
  32. Wang, Y., An, M.Z. and Yu, Z.R. (2017), "Durability of reactive powder concrete under chloride-salt freeze-thaw cycling", Mater. Struct., 50(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-016-0878-5.
  33. Wu, W.P., Li, L.F. and Shao, X.D. (2014), "Seismic evaluation of the aged high-pier and long-span bridges subjected to extremely halobiotic condition", Bridge Maintain. Safety Managem., 2031-2037. https://doi.org/10.1201/b17063-314.
  34. Xiang, N.L. and Alam, M.S. (2019), "Comparative Seismic Fragility Assessment of an Existing Isolated Continuous Bridge Retrofitted with Different Energy Dissipation Devices", J Bridge Eng., 24(8), 04019070. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001425.
  35. Zhong, J.Q., Paolo, G. and David, R. (2012), "Seismic fragility estimates for corroding reinforced concrete bridges", Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., 8(1), 55-69. https://doi.org/10.10.80/15732470903241881.