Earthquakes and Structures

  • 제19권4호
  • /
  • Pages.227-241
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 2092-7614(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2092-7622(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of frame connection rigidity on the behavior of infilled steel frames

  • 투고 : 2019.02.17
  • 심사 : 2020.10.05
  • 발행 : 2020.10.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

An experimental study has been carried out to investigate the effect of beam to column connection rigidity on the behavior of infilled steel frames. Five half scale, single-story and single-bay specimens, including four infilled frames, as well as, one bare frame, were tested under in-plane lateral cyclic reversal loading. The connections of beam to column for bare frame as well as two infill specimens were rigid, whereas those of others were pinned. For each frame type, two different infill panels were considered: (1) masonry infill, (2) masonry infill strengthened with shotcrete. The experimental results show that the infilled frames with pinned connections have less stiffness, strength and potential of energy dissipation compared to those with rigid connections. Furthermore, the validity of analytical methods proposed in the literature was examined by comparing the experimental data with analytical ones. It is shown that the analytical methods overestimate the stiffness of infilled frame with pinned connections; however, the strength estimation of both infilled frames with rigid and pinned connections is acceptable.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. ABAQUS user manual (2012), Version 6.12. Dassault Systemes Simulia Corp, Rhode Island, U.S.A.
  2. AISC Committee (2010), Specification for structural steel buildings (ANSI/AISC 360-10), American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago.
  3. ASCE/SEI Seismic Rehabilitation Standards Committee (2007), "Seismic rehabilitation of existing buildings (ASCE/SEI 41-06)", American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA.
  4. ASTM C109 (2002), Standard test method for compressive strength of hydraulic cement mortars (Using 2-In. or [50-Mm] Cube Specimens), ASTM Int., West Conshohocken.
  5. ASTM C1314-03b (2004), Standard test method for compressive strength of masonry prisms, ASTM Int.
  6. ASTM E8/E8M (2009), "Standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials", ASTM Int., West Conshohocken.
  7. Chopra, A.K. (2001), "Dynamics of structures: Theory and applications to earthquake engineering", Prentice-Hall.
  8. CSA S304 (2004), Design of masonry structures, Canadian Standards Association, Mississauga, Canada.
  9. CSI SAP2000 V 14.1 (2010), "Integrated finite element analysis and design of structures basic analysis reference manual", Comput. Struct., Berkeley, U.S.A.
  10. Dawe, J.L. and Seah, C.K. (1989), "Behaviour of masonry infilled steel frames", Canada. J. Civil Eng., 16, 865-876. https://doi.org/10.1139/l89-129.
  11. El-Dakhakhni W.W., Elgaaly, M. and Hamid, A.A. (2003), "Threestrut model for concrete mansonry-infilled steel frames", J. Struct. Eng., 129, 177-185. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:2(177).
  12. Fang, Y., Gu, Q. and Shen, L. (2008), "Hysteretic behavior of simi-rigid composite steel frame with reinforced concrete infill wall in column weak axis", J. Build. Struct., 2.
  13. FEMA 356 (2000), Commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C.
  14. FEMA 461 (2007), Interim testing protocols for determining the seismic performance characteristics of structural and nonstructural components", Federal Emergency Management Agency.
  15. Flanagan, R.D. and Bennett, R.M. (1999), "In-plane behavior of structural clay tile infilled frames", J. Struct. Eng., 125, 590-599. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1999)125:6(590).
  16. Flanagan, R.D. and Bennett, R.M. (2001), "In-plane analysis of masonry infill materials", Practice Periodical Struct. Des. Construct., 6, 176-182. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0680(2001)6:4(176).
  17. Harris, H.G. and Sabnis, G. (1999), "Structural modeling and experimental techniques", CRC Press.
  18. Hashemi, S.J., Razzaghi, J., Moghadam, A.S. and Lourenco, P.B. (2018), "Cyclic testing of steel frames infilled with concrete sandwich panels", Archive. Civil Mech. Eng., 18(2), 557-572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acme.2017.10.007
  19. Holmes, M. (1961), "Steel frames with brickwork and concrete infilling", In ICE Proceedings. Thomas Telford, 19, 473-478. https://doi.org/10.1680/iicep.1961.11305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acme.2017.10.007.
  20. INBC-Part 8 (2005), Design and construction of masonry buildings, Iranian national building code, part 8. IR (Iran), Ministry of Housing and Urban Development.
  21. Kaltakci, M.Y., Koken, A. and Korkmaz, H.H. (2006), "Analytical solutions using the equivalent strut tie method of infilled steel frames and experimental verification", Canada. J. Civil Eng., 33, 632-638. https://doi.org/10.1139/l06-004.
  22. Liu, Y. and Manesh, P. (2013), "Concrete masonry infilled steel frames subjected to combined in-plane lateral and axial loading-an experimental study", Eng. Struct., 52, 331-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.02.038.
  23. Mainstone, R.J. (1971), "On the stiffness and strengths of infilled frames", In ICE Proceedings. Thomas Telford, 49, 230. https://doi.org/10.1680/iicep.1971.6267
  24. Mander, J.B. and Nair, B., Wojtkowski, K. and Ma, J. (1993), "An experimental study on the seismic performance of brickinfilled steel frames with and without retrofit", In Technical Report. National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research (NCEER).
  25. Masonry Standard Joint Committee (2012), Building code requirements for masonry structures, ACI S30/ASCE 5/TMS 402, American Concrete Institute, the American Society of Civil Engineers and The Masonry Society, U.S.A.
  26. Moghadam, H., Mohammadi, M.G. and Ghaemian, M. (2006), "Experimental and analytical investigation in to crack strength determination of infilled steel frames", J. Construct. Steel Res., 62, 1341-1352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2006.01.002.
  27. Moghaddam, H. (2004), "Lateral load behavior of masonry infilled steel frames with repair and retrofit", J. Struct. Eng., 130, 56-63. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:1(56).
  28. Moghaddam, H.A. and Dowling, P.J. (1987), "The state of the art in infilled frames", London: Imperial College of Science and Technology, Civil Engineering Department.
  29. Mohamed, H.M. and Romao, X. (2018), "Performance analysis of a detailed FE modelling strategy to simulate the behaviour of masonry-infilled RC frames under cyclic loading", Earthq. Struct., 14(6), 551-565. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2018.14.6.551.
  30. Mohammadi, M. (2007), "Stiffness and damping of infilled steel frames", Proceedings of the ICE-Structures and Buildings, 160, 105-118. https://doi.org/10.1680/stbu.2007.160.2.105.
  31. Mohammadi, M. and Motovali Emami, S.M. (2019), "Multi-bay and pinned connection steel infilled frames; An experimental and numerical study", Eng. Struct., 188, 43-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.03.028.
  32. Motovali Emami, S.M. and Mohammadi, M. (2016), "Influence of vertical load on in-plane behavior of masonry infilled steel frames", Earthq. Struct., 11(4), 609-627. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.11.4.609
  33. Peng, X., Gu, Q. and Lin, C. (2008), "Experimental study on steel frame reinforced concrete infill wall structures with semi-rigid joints", China Civ. Eng. J., 41(1), 64-69. https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1000-131X.2008.01.010
  34. Polyakov, S.V. (1960), "On the interaction between masonry filler walls and enclosing frame when loaded in the plane of the wall", Translations Earthq. Eng., 2(3), 36-42.
  35. Sakr, M.A., Eladly, M.M., Khalifa, T. and El-Khoriby, S. (2019), "Cyclic behaviour of infilled steel frames with different beamto-column connection types", Steel Composite Struct., 30(5), 443-456. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2019.30.5.443.
  36. Stafford-Smith, B. and Carter, C. (1969), "A method of analysis for infilled frames", In ICE Proceedings Thomas Telford, 44, 31-48. https://doi.org/10.1680/iicep.1969.7290
  37. Standard No 2800 (2005), "Iranian code of practice for seismic resistant design of buildings", Third Revision, Building and Housing Research Center, Iran.
  38. Sun, G., He, R., Qiang, G. and Fang, Y. (2011), "Cyclic behavior of partially-restrained steel frame with RC infill walls", J. Construct. Steel Res., 67(12), 1821-1834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2011.06.002
  39. Yan, P. (2006), Hysteretic Behavior and Design Criterion of Composite Steel Frame Reinforce Concrete Infill Wall Structural System with FR Connections, Ph. D. Dissertation, Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology.
  40. Yekrangnia, M. and Mohammadi, M. (2017), "A new strut model for solid masonry infills in steel frames", Eng. Struct., 135, 222-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.10.048.