Water for future (물과 미래)

Korea Water Resources Association (한국수자원학회)
권호 표지

환경생태유량 취약성 평가 및 자연유황 회복을 위한 환경생태유량 산정 기술

  • 김승기 (한국환경정책.평가연구원) ;
  • 강형식 (한국환경정책.평가연구원) ;
  • 전동진 (한국환경정책.평가연구원)
  • Published : 2020.09.25
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Keywords

References

  1. 김호정 외 (2015). 환경생태유량, 친수용수 등 물수요 변화에 대응하는 물환경 정책 개발 연구. 한국환경정책.평가연구원.
  2. 환경부(2015), 제2차 물환경관리기본계획 ('16-'25)
  3. King, J., & Louw, D. (1998). Instream flow assessments for regulated rivers in South Africa using the Building Block Methodology. Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management, 1(2), 109-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1463-4988(98)00018-9
  4. Mathews, R., & Richter, B. D. (2007). Application of the Indicators of hydrologic alteration software in environmental flow setting 1. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 43(6), 1400-1413. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2007.00099.x
  5. Ochs, K., Rivaes, R. P., Ferreira, T., & Egger, G. (2018). Flow management to control excessive growth of macrophytes - an assessment based on habitat suitability modeling. Frontiers in plant science, 9, 356. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00356
  6. Peake, P., Fitzsimons, J., Frood, D., Mitchell, M., Withers, N., White, M., & Webster, R. (2011). A new approach to determining environmental flow requirements: Sustaining the natural values of floodplains of the southern Murray - Darling Basin. Ecological Management & Restoration, 12(2), 128-137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-8903.2011.00581.x
  7. Poff, N. L., & Ward, J. V. (1989). Implications of streamflow variability and predictability for lotic community structure: a regional analysis of streamflow patterns. Canadian journal of fisheries and aquatic sciences, 46(10), 1805-1818. https://doi.org/10.1139/f89-228
  8. Poff, N. L., Richter, B. D., Arthington, A. H., Bunn, S. E., Naiman, R. J., Kendy, E., ... & Henriksen, J. (2010). The ecological limits of hydrologic alteration (ELOHA): a new framework for developing regional environmental flow standards. Freshwater Biology, 55(1), 147-170. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02204.x
  9. Richter, B. D., Baumgartner, J. V., Powell, J., & Braun, D. P. (1996). A method for assessing hydrologic alteration within ecosystems. Conservation biology, 10(4), 1163-1174. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10041163.x
  10. Shang, S. H., & Mao, X. M. (2010). Determination of minimum flood flow for regeneration of floodplain forest from inundated forest width-stage curve. Water Science and Engineering, 3(3), 257-268. https://doi.org/10.3882/j.issn.1674-2370.2010.03.002
  11. Tharme, R. E. (2003). A global perspective on environmental flow assessment: emerging trends in the development and application of environmental flow methodologies for rivers. River research and applications, 19(5-6), 397-441. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.736
  12. Wang, L., Chen, Q., Zhang, J., Xia, J., Mo, K., & Wang, J. (2020). Incorporating fish habitat requirements of the complete life cycle into ecological flow regime estimation of rivers. Ecohydrology, e2204.
  13. Young, W. J., Scott, A. C., Cuddy, S. M., & Rennie, B. A. (2003). Murray flow assessment tool: a technical description. Report to the CRC for Freshwater Ecology from CSIRO Land and Water, Canberra.