Journal of Radiation Protection and Research

The Korean Association for Radiation Protection (대한방사선방어학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparative Study of Tritium Analysis Method with High-Volume Counting Vial

  • Yoon, Yoon Yeol (Geologic Environment Division, Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources) ;
  • Kim, Yongcheol (Geologic Environment Division, Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources)
  • Received : 2020.05.12
  • Accepted : 2020.07.15
  • Published : 2020.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background: Tritium (3H) analysis in groundwater was difficult because of its low activity. Therefore, the electrolytic enrichment method was used. To improve the detection limit and for performing simple analysis, a high-volume counting vial with the available liquid scintillation counter (LSC) was investigated. Further, it was compared with a conventional 20-mL counting vial. Materials and Methods: The LSC with the electrolytic enrichment method was used 3H analysis in groundwater. A high-volume 145-mL counting vial was compared with a conventional 20-mL counting vial to determine the counting characteristics of different LSCs. Results and Discussion: When a Quantulus LSC was used, the counting window between channels 35 and 250 was used. The background count was approximately 1.86 cpm, and the counting efficiency increased from 8% to 40% depending on the mixing ratio of the volume of sample and cocktail solution. For LSC-LB7, the optimum counting window was between 1 and 4.9 keV, which was selected by the factory (Hitachi Aloka Medical Ltd., Japan) by considering quenching using a standard external gamma source. The background count of LSC-LB7 was approximately 3.60 ± 0.29 cpm when the 145-mL vial was used and 2.22 ± 0.17 cpm when the 20-mL vial was used. The minimum detectable activity (MDA) of the 20-mL vial was greater for LSC-LB7 than for Quantulus. The MDA with the 145-mL vial was improved to 0.3 Bq/L when compared with the value of 1.6 Bq/L for the 20-mL vial. Conclusion: The counting efficiency when using the 145-mL vial was 27%, whereas it was 18% when using the 20-mL vial. This difference can be attributed to the vial volume. The figure of merit (FOM) of the 145-mL vial was four times greater than that of the 20-mL vial because the volume of the former vial is approximately seven times greater than that of the latter. Further, the MDA for 3H decreased from 1.6 to 0.3 Bq/L. The counting efficiency and FOM of LSC-LB7 was slightly less than those of Quantulus when the 20-mL vial was used. The background counting rate of the Quantulus was lower than that of the LSC-LB7.

Keywords

References

  1. Firestone RB, Shirley VS. Table of isotopes. 8th ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Inc.; 1996.
  2. Gusyev MA, Morgenstern U, Stewart MK, Yamazaki Y, Kashiwaya K, Nishihara T, et al. Application of tritium in precipitation and baseflow in Japan: a case study of groundwater transit times and storage in Hokkaido watersheds. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci. 2016;20:3043-3058. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-3043-2016
  3. Mayer A, Sultenfuss J, Travi Y, Rebeix R, Purtschert R, Claude C, et al. A multi-tracer study of groundwater origin and transit-time in the aquifers of the Venice region (Italy). Appl Geochem. 2014;50:177-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2013.10.009
  4. Subbotin SB, Aidarkhanov AO, Dubasov YV. Migration of tritium with underground waters on the former Semipalatinsk test site. Radiochemistry. 2013;55:557-565. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1066362213050184
  5. Ducros L, Eyrolle F, Vedova CD, Charmasson S, Leblanc M, Mayer A, et al. Tritium in river waters from French Mediterranean catchments: background levels and variability. Sci Total Environ. 2018;612:672-682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.026
  6. Cook P, Herczeg AL. Environmental tracers in subsurface hydrology. New York, NY: Springer; 2000.
  7. Von Buttlar H, Libby WF. Natural distribution of cosmic-ray produced tritium. II. J Inorg Nucl Chem. 1955;1:75-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1902(55)80070-X
  8. International Atomic Energy Agency. Guidebook on nuclear techniques in hydrology (1983 Edition). Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency; 1983.
  9. Taylor CB. Tritium enrichment of environmental waters by electrolysis: development of cathodes exhibiting high isotopic separation and precise measurement of tritium enrichment factors. Procedure and technique critique for tritium enrichment by electrolysis at the IAEA Laboratory; 1976 Nov 5; Seibersdorf, Austria.
  10. Yoon Y, Lee K, Ko K. Development and validation of Ni-Ni electrolytic enrichment method for tritium determination in samples of underground waters of Jeju Island. J Radioanal Nucl Chem. 2010;286:591-595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-010-0731-1
  11. Tanaka R, Araki S, Mukai T, Yasuoka Y, Ohnuma S, Ishikawa T, et al. A simplified method for improved determination of radon concentration in environmental water samples. Radioisotopes (Tokyo). 2013;62:423-438. https://doi.org/10.3769/radioisotopes.62.423
  12. Mullins S. A comparison of two liquid scintillation instruments for analysis of highly quenched samples. Proceedings of the Conference on Advances in Liquid Scintillation Spectrometry (LSC2017); 2017 May 1-5; Copenhagen, Denmark.
  13. Feng B, Chen B, Zhuo W, Zhang W. A new passive sampler for collecting atmospheric tritiated water vapor. Atmos Environ. 2017;154:308-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.01.035
  14. Currie LA. Limits for qualitative detection and quantitative determination: application to radiochemistry. Anal Chem. 1968;40:586-593. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60259a007