한국수학교육학회지시리즈E:수학교육논문집 (Communications of Mathematical Education)

  • 제34권3호
  • /
  • Pages.277-297
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 1226-6663(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-9935(eISSN)
한국수학교육학회 (Korean Society of Mathematical Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

수학교육적 가치에 대한 예비 초등교사와 현직 초등교사의 인식 비교

Comparison of the Mathematics Educational Values between Pre-service and In-service Elementary School Teachers

  • 투고 : 2020.09.07
  • 심사 : 2020.09.22
  • 발행 : 2020.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구의 목적은 수학교육적 가치에 대한 예비 초등교사와 현직 초등교사의 인식을 확인하고 비교하는데 있다. 이를 위해 설문지를 활용하여 자료를 수집하고 주성분 분석(PCA)을 실시하여 요인 6개를 도출하였다. 이 요인은 체계적인 라벨링 과정을 거쳐 6가지 수학교육적 가치 즉 '재미', '문제 해결', '표현', '계산', '능력', '설명'으로 명명되었다. 예비 초등교사와 현직 초등교사 모두 '문제 해결'을 가장 중요하게 생각하였으며 이 요인에 대해 통계적으로 집단 간 유의미한 차이는 없었다. '설명'을 제외한 모든 수학교육적 가치에 대해 1학년 예비 초등교사, 4학년 예비 초등교사, 현직 초등교사 순으로 더 중요하게 여기는 경향이 있었다. 특히 예비 초등교사와 현직 초등교사 사이에 각 가치에 대한 인식의 차이가 두드러지는 것으로 나타났다. 이와 같은 연구 결과를 토대로 교사 교육 프로그램에서 수학교육적 가치의 구현과 관련하여 더 중요하고 의미 있게 다뤄야 할 것이 무엇인지 논의의 필요성을 강조하였다.

The purpose of this study was to identify and compare the mathematics educational values of pre-service and in-service elementary school teachers. For this purpose, we implemented a questionnaire investigating mathematics educational values and used principal component analysis which resulted in six components. These components were named as fun, problem-solving, representation, computation, ability, and explanation through systematic labeling processes. Both pre-service and in-service elementary school teachers considered problem-solving the most important and there was no statistical difference between the teacher groups. They also considered fun the least important and in-service elementary school teachers regarded it more important than pre-service counterparts did. All value components except explanation were regarded as important by in-service elementary school teachers, fourth-year pre-service teachers, and first-year pre-service teachers in order. The result of noticeable differences between pre-service and in-service elementary school teachers implies that actual teaching experience may affect teachers' mathematics educational values more than teacher preparation programs. Based on these findings, we need to discuss what should be regarded as important and worthwhile in teacher preparation programs to establish mathematics educational values for pre-service teachers. We also need to confirm whether the mathematics educational values by in-service elementary school teachers may be in line with what has been pursued in the national mathematics curriculum.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Kwak, S., & Kim, J. (2018). Analysis on the belief about mathematics of elementary school pre-service teachers and elementary school teachers. Education of Primary School Mathematics, 21(3), 329-349. https://doi.org/10.7468/JKSMEC.2018.21.3.329
  2. Ministry of Education (2015). Mathematics curriculum. The author.
  3. Park, K., Lee, H. W., Park, S. W., Kang, E. J., Kim, S. H., Lim, H. M. … Kang, S. K. (2015). Draft proposal II of the 2015 revised mathematics curriculum. Research report of Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity (BD15120005).
  4. Kim, H.-K., Park, C., Jeong, S., & Ko, H. (2018). A view on complementary relation of human teacher and AI teacher in future education, Journal of Education & Culture, 24(6), 189-207.
  5. Pang, J. & Kim, S. M. (2019). An analysis of the trends of value research: Focused on mathematical values and mathematics educational value. The Mathematical Education, 58(4), 609-625. https://doi.org/10.7468/mathedu.2019.58.4.609
  6. Pang, J. & Yim, M. J. (2019). Perception and change of the values on mathematics learning by fifth graders through the teaching of a master teacher. Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea, 23(4), 405-435.
  7. Pang, J. Cho, S. Y., & Seah, W. T. (2016). An investigation of what Korean students valued with regards to mathematics and mathematics learning: A study with sixth and ninth graders. Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea, 55(4), 467-484.
  8. Yim, M. J. (2020). An Analysis of Mathematical and Mathematics Educational Values of Prospective Elementary School Teachers. Korea National University of Education Master's Degree.
  9. Cho, S. Y. (2017). Analyzing values of students and teachers in mathematical learning and aspects of instruction considering values. Korea National University of Education Doctor's Degree.
  10. Barkatsas, T., Law, H. Y., Wong, N. Y., & Seah, W. T. (2018). Valuing from student's perspectives as a lens to understand mathematics learning: The case of Hong Kong. In B. Rott, G. Törner, J. Peters-Dasdemir, A. Moller, & Safrüdiannur (Eds.), Views and beliefs in mathematics education: The role of beliefs in the classroom (pp. 43-53). Cham: Springer.
  11. Bishop, A. J. (1988). Mathematical enculturation: A cultural perspective on mathematics education. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
  12. Bishop, A. J. (1996). How should mathematics teaching in modern societies relate to cultural values: some preliminary questions. Paper presented at the Seventh Southeast Asian Conference on Mathematics Education, Hanoi, Vietnam.
  13. Bishop, A. J. (2014). Values in mathematics education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 633-636). Dordrecht: Springer.
  14. Carr M. E. (2019). Student and/or teacher valuing in mathematics classrooms: Where are we now, and where should we go? In P. Clarkson, W. Seah, & J. Pang (Eds.), Values and valuing in mathematics education (pp. 25-52). Cham: Springer.
  15. Chin, C. (2006). Conceptualising pedagogical values and identities in teacher development. In Mathematics education in different cultural traditions-A comparative study of East Asia and the West (pp. 537-547). Boston: Springer.
  16. Clarkson, P., Bishop, A. J., FitzSimons, G. E., & Seah, W. T. (2000). Challenges and constraints in researching values. In J. Bana, & A. Chapman (Eds.), Mathematics education beyond 2000. Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 188-195). Perth: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.
  17. Clarkson, P., Seah, W. T., & Pang, J. (Eds.), (2019). Values and valuing in mathematics education: Scanning and scoping the territory. ICME-13 Monographs. Cham: Springer.
  18. Corey, D. L. & Ninomiya, H. (2019). Values of the Japanese mathematics teacher community. In P. Clarkson, W. Seah, & J. Pang (Eds.), Values and valuing in mathematics education (pp. 53-67). Cham: Springer.
  19. Davis E. K., Carr M. E., & Ampadu E. (2019). Valuing in mathematics learning amongst ghanaian students: What does it look like across grade levels? In P. Clarkson, W. Seah, & J. Pang (Eds.), Values and valuing in mathematics education: Scanning and scoping the territory (pp. 89-102). ICME-13 Monographs. Cham: Springer.
  20. Dede, Y. (2013). The effect of German and Turkish mathematics teachers' teaching experience on mathematics education values: A cross-comparative study. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 44(2), 232-252. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2012.714489
  21. FitzSimons, G., Seah, W. T., Bishop, A. J., & Clarkson, P. C. (2000). Conceptions of values and mathematics education held by Australian primary teahcers: Preliminary findings from VAMP. In W. S. Horng & F. L. Lin (Eds.), In Proceedings of the HPM 2000 International Conference on History in Mathematics Education: Challenges for a New Millennium. (Vol. 2, pp. 163-171). Taipei: National Taiwan Normal University.
  22. FitzSimons, G., Seah, W. T., Bishop, A. J., & Clarkson, P. C. (2001). Beyond numeracy: Values in mathematics classroom. In J. Bobis, B. Berry, & M. Mitchelmore (Eds.), In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 202-209). Fremantle: MERGA.
  23. Han, C. D. & Seah, W. T. (2019). What Australian students say they value most in their mathematics learning. In G. Hine, S. Blackley, & A. Cooke (Eds.), Mathematics education research: Impacting practice (Proceedings of the 42nd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia) (pp. 332-339). Perth: MERGA.
  24. Hannula, M. S. (2012). Looking at the third wave from the West: Framing values within a broader scope of affective traits. ZDM, 44(1), 83-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0410-5
  25. Lampert, M. (2001). Teaching Problems and the Problems of Teaching. Yale University Press, New Haven: CT.
  26. Pang, J. & Seah, W. T. (2020). Excellent mathematical performance despite "negative" affect of students in Korea: The values perspective. ECNU Review of Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/2096531120930726
  27. Philipp, R. A. (2007). Mathematics teachers' beliefs and affect. In F. K. Lester, Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 257-315). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
  28. Raths, L. E., Harmin, M., & Simon, S. B. (1987). Selections from values and teaching. In P. F. Carbone (Ed.), Value theory and education (pp. 198-214). Malabar: Krieger
  29. Reitan, R. M. & Wolfson, D. (2000). Conation: A neglected aspect of neuropsychological functioning. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 15(5), 443-453. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0887-6177(99)00043-8
  30. Schoenfeld, A. H. (2010). How we think: A theory of goal-oriented decision making and its educational applications. New York: Routledge.
  31. Seah, W. T. (2005). The negotiation of perceived value differences by immigrant teachers of mathematics in Australia. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.
  32. Seah, W. T. (2013). Assessing values in mathematics education. In A. M. Lindmeier & A. Heinze (Eds.), Proceedings of the 37th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education. (Vol. 4, pp. 193-200). Kiel, Germany: PME.
  33. Seah, W. T. (2018). Improving mathematics pedagogy through student/teacher valuing: Lessons from five continents. In G. Kaiser, H. Forgasz, M. Graven, A. Kuzniak, E. Simmt, & B. Xu (Eds.), 13th International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 561-580). ICME-13 Monographs. Cham: Springer.
  34. Seah, W. T. (2019). Values in mathematics education: Its conative nature, and how it can be developed. Research in Mathematics Education, 22(2), 99-121.
  35. Seah, W. T. & Andersson, A. (2015). Valuing diversity in mathematics pedagogy through the volitional nature and alignment of values. In A. Bishop, H. Tan, & T. Barkatsas (Eds.), Diversity in mathematics education (pp. 167-183). Cham: Springer.
  36. Seah, W. T., Baba, T., & Zhang, Q. P. (2017). The WIFI study: Students' valuing of mathematics learning in Hong Kong and Japan. In J. W. Son, T. Watanabe, & J. J. Lo (Eds.), What matters? Research trends in international comparative studies in mathematics education (pp. 333-354). Cham: Springer.
  37. Seah, W. T. & Peng, A. (2012). What students outside Asia value in effective mathematics lessons: A scoping study. ZDM, 44(1), 71-82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0398-x
  38. White, L. A. (1959). The evolution of culture. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  39. Zhang, Q., Barkatsas, T., Law, H. Y., Leu, Y. C., Seah, W. T., & Wong, N. Y. (2015). What primary students in the Chinese Mainland, Hong Kong and Taiwan value in mathematics learning: A comparative analysis. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(5), 907-924.