DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

K-TIHM: Korean Technology Integration Hierarchy Model for Teaching and Learning in STEAM Education

  • Park, Chan Jung (Department of Computer Education, Jeju National University) ;
  • Hyun, Jung Suk (Department of Management Information Systems, Jeju National University)
  • Received : 2020.12.10
  • Accepted : 2020.12.29
  • Published : 2020.12.31

Abstract

The core competencies for the 21st century are creativity, critical thinking, collaboration, and communication. In recent classes where ICT (information, communication, and technology) is grafted, a lot of efforts are also being made to increase such competencies. According to a research work, ICT is most often used as a communication channel between teachers and students or as an online collaboration tool among students. However, ICT has only played a role as a guideline for instruction, but not included in the curriculum until now. The research on methods how to integrate technology into teaching and learning is in full swing due to the development of technology and the advent of Covid-19. In this paper, we propose a technology integration hierarchy model, namely K-TIHM that can be combined with STEAM education. Since only learning environments have been proposed in the existing research for technology-based STEAM education, our model proposes a series of technology integration hierarchy that can be applied by school age along with STEAM. Also, we analyze the differences in among the Korea's ICT education operation guidelines, the Korea's Software education guidelines, and ours. The proposed model can help developing the primary and secondary school curriculum integrated with technology.

Keywords

References

  1. Korea Ministry of Education, Education Policy Direction and Core Tasks in the Age of Artificial Intelligence, [Online] Available: https://www.korea.kr/archive/expDocView.do?docId=39237&call_from=rsslink, November, 30th, 2020.
  2. J.S. Hyun and C.J. Park, "Analysis of research trends on STEAM education based on edutechs", Proceedings of the Korean Association for Computer Education, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 89-91, 2020.
  3. https://tech.ed.gov/files/2019/10/stem-innovation-spotlights-research-synthesis.pdf, November, 30th, 2020.
  4. https://moe.go.kr/boardCnts/view.do?boardID=294&boardSeq=78251&lev=0&searchType=null&statusYN =W&page=1&s=moe&m=020402&opType=N, November, 30th, 2020.
  5. https://oecdedutoday.com/computer-science-and-pisa-2021/, November, 30th, 2020.
  6. J. S. Alivi, "A Review of TPACK and SAMR Models: How Should Language Teachers Adopt Technology?", Journal of English for Academic and Specific Purposes, Vol. 2, No. 2, December, 2019.
  7. H. Jho, O. Hong, and J. Song, "An analysis of STEM/STEAM teacher education in Korea with a case study of two schools from a community of practice perspective", Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, Vol. 12, No. 7, pp. 1843-1862, 2016.
  8. https://www.edutopia.org/technology-integration-guide-description, November, 30th, 2020.
  9. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technologicalpedagogicalcontentknowledge, November, 30th, 2020.
  10. Y. Kwak, "Early Childhood Teachers' Perception of TPACK-Technology Pedagogical and Content Knowledge", Early Childhood Education Research, Vol. 36, No. 6, pp. 245-276, 2016.
  11. https://educationaltechnology.net/technological-pedagogi-cal-content-knowledge-tpack-framework/, November, 2020.
  12. P. Mishra and M.J. Koehler, "Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for integrating technology in teachers' knowledge", Teachers College Record, Vol. 108, No. 6, pp. 1017-1054, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
  13. R. Puentedura, "SAMR and TPCK: Intro to advanced practice", [Online] Available: http://hippasus.com/ resources/sweden2010/SAMRTPCKIntroToAdvancedPractice.pdf, 2010.
  14. D. Romrell, L. Kidder, and E. Wood, "The SAMR model as a framework for evaluating mLearning", Online Learning Journal, Vol. 18, No. 2, 2014.
  15. https://sites.google.com/a/ames.k12.ia.us/ahs-technology-integration/home/tpack-and-samr, November, 2020.
  16. https://www.21c-learning.com/podcast/education-vangu ard-episode-4-dr-ruben-puentedura-creator-of-samr/, November, 30th, 2020.
  17. R. Winkelman. The Invisible Technology Integration Matrix, Teaching and Learning with Technology https://fcit. usf.edu/matrix/the-invisible-technology-integration-matrix/ , 2019.
  18. https://fcit.usf.edu/matrix/matrix/, November, 30th, 2020.
  19. J. H. Curry and D. M. Curry, "Review of Kolb, L. (2017). Learning First, Technology Second: The Educator's Guide to Designing Authentic Lessons", Portland, OR: International Society for Technology in Education", TechTrends, Vol. 62, No. 6, pp. 667-668, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0333-2
  20. B. S. Bloom, "Taxonomy of educational objectives. Vol. 1: Cognitive domain", New York: McKay, Vol. 20, 1956.
  21. H. Lee and J. H. Kwon, "A Study on the Issues and Perceptions of 5G Industry in Digital Transformation Era: Focused on News Network Analysis", Journal of KIIT, Vol. 17, No. 11, pp. 9-16, Nov. 2019.
  22. E. Hamilton, J. Rosenberg, and M. Akcaoglu, "The Substitution Augmentation Modification Redefinition (SAMR) Model: A Critical Review and Suggestions for its Use", TechTrends, Vol. 60, No. 4, pp. 433-441, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0091-y
  23. B. Ojose, "Applying Piaget's theory of cognitive development to mathematics instruction", The Mathematics Educator, Vol. 18, No.1, 2008.
  24. R. Winkelman, "Ownership of Learning with Technology", [Online] Available: https://fcit.usf.edu/matrix/ ownership-of-learning/, November, 30th, 2020.
  25. G. Y. Eksi, "Peer Review Versus Teacher Feedback in Process Writing: How Effective", International Journal of Applied Educational Studies, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 33-48, 2012.
  26. N. Stozhko, "Interdisciplinary Project-Based Learning: Technology for Improving Student Cognition", Research in Learning Technology, Vol. 23, 2015.
  27. M. M. Capraro and M. Jones, "Interdisciplinary STEM Project-Based Learning", In STEM Project-Based Learning, Brill Sense, pp. 51-58, 2013.
  28. A. Sahin, "The Role of Interdisciplinary Project-Based Learning in Integrated STEM Education", In STEM Education 2.0. Brill Sense, pp.93-103, 2019.
  29. https://www.classter.com/2020/04/22/100-tools-digital-classroom/, November, 30th, 2020.
  30. http://www.nl.go.kr/app/nl/search/common/download.jsp?file_id=FILE-00013435743, November, 30th, 2020.
  31. Korea Ministry of Education, Software Education Operational Guide, [Online] Available: http://www.prism.go.kr/homepage/entire/retrieveEntireDetail.do;jsessionid=18688BC5AD7531E0892B797EC67EAF0E.node02?cond_research_name=&cond_research_start_date=&cond_research_end_date=&research_id=1342000-01500079&pageIndex=286&leftMenuLevel=160, November, 30th, 2020.
  32. https://www.edutopia.org/technology-integration-guide-description, November, 30th, 2020.