한국과학교육학회지 (Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education)

  • 제40권4호
  • /
  • Pages.399-413
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 1226-5187(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-8489(eISSN)
한국과학교육학회 (The Korean Association for Science Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

과학교사의 과학의 본성 수업에 대한 교과교육학 지식(NOS-PCK) 탐색 -과학탐구실험을 중심으로-

An Exploration of Science Teachers' NOS-PCK: Focus on Science Inquiry Experiment

  • 투고 : 2020.05.27
  • 심사 : 2020.08.08
  • 발행 : 2020.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

이 연구에서는 과학탐구실험 수업에서 나타나는 과학교사의 NOS-PCK를 분석하였다. 수도권에 소재한 고등학교에서 과학탐구실험을 담당하고 있는 4명의 과학교사가 연구에 참여하였다. 이들의 NOS 수업을 관찰하였고, 교수학습 자료를 수집하였으며, 반구조화된 면담을 실시하였다. 수집한 자료를 NOS-PCK의 다섯 가지 요소에 따라 분석하였다. 연구 결과, NOS와 관련된 교육과정에 대한 이해와 고려가 부족한 경우가 있었다. 그리고 주어진 탐구 활동이나 교과서의 구성이 NOS 교수에 효과적이지 않다고 생각하여 교육과정을 적극적으로 재구성하였다. 교수전략의 측면에서 교사들의 수업은 명시적인 접근에 가까웠으나 반성적인 접근은 대체적으로 부족하였다. 교사들은 NOS에 대한 견해가 개인의 주관적인 것이라거나 NOS가 인지적 학습의 영역이 아니라는 등의 이유를 들어 NOS에 대한 평가에 소홀한 모습을 보였다. 교사들은 평가 결과에 기반하기보다는 자신의 경험에 의존하여 학생들의 상태를 추측하였다. 마지막으로 NOS 교수에 대한 의지는 교사의 수업 전반에서 중요한 역할을 하였으며 교사들은 NOS 학습의 가치 중 특정 측면에 주목하였다. 이상의 결과를 바탕으로 NOS 교수에 대한 과학교사의 전문성을 높이기 위한 방안을 논의하였다.

In this study, we analyzed science teachers' NOS-PCK in Science Inquiry Experiment lessons. Four science teachers in charge of Science Inquiry Experiment in high schools located in the Seoul metropolitan area participated in the study. NOS Lessons were observed, all of the teaching-learning materials were collected, and semi-structured interviews were conducted. All the collected data were analyzed according to five factors of NOS-PCK. As a result of the study, their understanding and consideration of the curriculum related to NOS were insufficient in some cases. They thought that given inquiry activities or textbook composition was not effective for NOS teaching so that they actively reconstructed the curriculum. In terms of teaching strategies, their lessons were close to explicit approaches. However reflective approaches were generally lacking. They were neglected in evaluating NOS for reasons that views of NOS are individually subjective or that NOS is not an area of cognitive learning. They guessed the state of students by relying on their own experiences rather than based on evaluation results. They recognized a specific aspect of values of NOS learning. And intention to teach NOS played an important role throughout their classes. Based on the above results, we discuss some ways to improve the professionalism of science teachers for NOS teaching.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2013). Teaching with and about nature of science, and science teacher knowledge domains. Science & Education, 22(9), 2087-2107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-012-9520-2
  2. Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (1998). The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural. Science Education, 82(4), 417-436. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199807)82:4<417::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-E
  3. Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000a). Improving science teachers' conceptions of nature of science: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), 665-701. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690050044044
  4. Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000b). The influence of history of science courses on students' views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(10), 1057-1095. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200012)37:10<1057::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-C
  5. Akerson, V. L., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2003). Teaching elements of nature of science: A yearlong case study of a fourth grade teacher. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(10), 1025-1049. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10119
  6. Akerson, V. L., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Influence of a reflective explicit activity-based approach on elementary teachers' conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(4), 295-317. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200004)37:4<295::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-2
  7. Akerson, V. L., & Hanuscin, D. L. (2007). Teaching nature of science through inquiry: Results of a 3-year professional development program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(5), 653-680. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20159
  8. Akerson, V. L., Morrison, J. A., & McDuffie, A. R. (2006). One course is not enough: Preservice elementary teachers' retention of improved views of the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(2), 194-213. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20099
  9. Byun, T., Baek, J., Shim, H.-P., & Lee, D. (2019). An investigation on the implementation of the 'Scientific Inquiry Experiment' of the 2015 Revised Curriculum. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 39(5), 669-679.
  10. Cho, E. (2020). A case study of science teachers' intention of teaching nature of science -An investigation into interplay between knowledge and beliefs-. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 20(5), 21-50. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2020.20.5.21
  11. Deniz, H., & Adibelli, E. (2015). Exploring how second grade elementary teachers translate their nature of science views into classroom practice after a graduate level nature of science course. Research in Science Education, 45(6), 867-888. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-014-9447-5
  12. Driver, R., Leach, J., Miller, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young people's images of science. Bristol, PA: Open University Press.
  13. Edmondson, K. M., & Novak, J. D. (1993). The interplay of scientific epistemological views, learning strategies, and attitudes of college students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(6), 547-559. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660300604
  14. Elder, A. D. (2002). Characterizing fifth grade students' epistemological beliefs in science. In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 347-363). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  15. Elfin, J. T., Glennan, S., & Reisch, G. (1999). The nature of science: A perspective from the philosophy of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(1), 107-117. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199901)36:1<107::AID-TEA7>3.0.CO;2-3
  16. Erduran, S., & Dagher, Z. R. (2014). Reconceptualizing the nature of science for science education: Scientific knowledge, practice and other family categories. Dordrecht, NL: Springer
  17. Faikhamta, C. (2013). The development of in-service science teachers' understandings of and orientations to teaching the nature of science within a PCK-based NOS course. Research in Science Education, 43(2), 847-869. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9283-4
  18. French, M. (2012). Using the science museum's 'Mystery Boxes' as a model for science and 'How science works'. School Science Review, 94(347), 15-16.
  19. Friedrichsen, P., Driel, J. H. V., & Abell, S. K. (2011). Taking a closer look at science teaching orientations. Science Education, 95(2), 358-376. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20428
  20. Geddis, A. N., Onslow, B., Beynon, C., & Oesch, J. (1993). Transforming content knowledge: Learning to teach about isotopes. Science Education, 77(6), 575-591. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730770603
  21. Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  22. Haney, J. J., Czerniak, C. M., & Lumpe, A. T. (1996). Teacher beliefs and intentions regarding the implementation of science education reform strands. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(9), 971-993. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199611)33:9<971::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-S
  23. Hanuscin, D. L., Lee, M. H., & Akerson, V. L. (2011). Elementary teachers' pedagogical content knowledge for teaching the nature of science. Science Education, 95(1), 145-167. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20404
  24. Hong, H., & Park, J. (2014). Comprehensive presuppositions regarding nature of science, scientific causality, and nature held by in-service secondary science teachers. Journal of Science Education, 38(2), 454-469. https://doi.org/10.21796/jse.2014.38.2.454
  25. Khishfe, R., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002). The influence of explicit reflective versus implicit inquiry-oriented instruction on sixth graders' views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(7), 551-578. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10036
  26. Kim, M., Kim, S., Noh, T., & Choi, S. (2019). The influences of integrated science and science inquiry experiment developed under the 2015 Revised National Curriculum on students' interest in science, scientific attitude, views on Science-Technology-Society relationship, and views on nature of science. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 39(6), 791-797. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2019.39.6.791
  27. Kim, S. H., & Lee, Y. H. (2016). The study on science teachers' understandings of the nature of science (NOS) through the science writng heuristic (SWH). Biology Education, 44(3), 538-554. https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2016.44.3.538
  28. Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 331-359. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660290404
  29. Lederman, N. G. (1999). Teachers' understanding of the nature of science and classroom practice: Factors that facilitate or impede the relationship. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(8), 916-929. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199910)36:8<916::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-A
  30. Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of science: Past, present, and future. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 831-879). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  31. Lederman, N. G., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (1998). Avoiding de-natured science: Activities that promote understandings of the nature of science. In W. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies. (pp. 83-126). Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  32. Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners' conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 497-521. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10034
  33. Lederman, N. G., Schwartz, R. S., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Bell, R. L. (2001). Pre-service teachers' understanding and teaching of nature of science: An intervention study. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 1(2), 135-160. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926150109556458
  34. Lim, S.-M., Cheong, W.-Y., & Yang, I.-H. (2010). Elementary science-gifted teachers' views and attitudes toward teaching on nature of science. Journal of Science Education, 34(2), 396-404. https://doi.org/10.21796/jse.2010.34.2.396
  35. Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 95-132). Boston, MA: Kluwer.
  36. Matthews, M. R. (2012). Changing the focus: From nature of science to features of science. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Advances in nature of science research (pp. 3-26). Dordrecht, NL: Springer
  37. McComas, W. F., Almazroa, H., & Clough, M. P. (1998). The nature of science in science education: An introduction. Science & Education, 7(6), 511-532. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008642510402
  38. McComas, W. F., Clough, M. P., & Almazroa, H. (2000). The role and character of the nature of science in science education. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education (pp. 41-52). Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer.
  39. McComas, W. F., & Nouri, N. (2016). The nature of science and the next generation science standards: Analysis and critique. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 27(5), 555-576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-016-9474-3
  40. Ministry of Education (MOE) (2011). 2009 Revised Science National Curriculum. Seoul: Ministry of Education.
  41. Ministry of Education (MOE) (2015). 2015 Revised Science National Curriculum. Seoul: Ministry of Education.
  42. Mulvey, B. K., & Bell, R. L. (2017). Making learning last: Teachers' long-term retention of improved nature of science conceptions and instructional rationales. International Journal of Science Education, 39(1), 62-85. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1267879
  43. Olson, J. K. (2018). The inclusion of the nature of science in nine recent international science education standards documents. Science & Education, 27(7-8), 637-660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-018-9993-8
  44. Osborne, J., Collins, S., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. (2003). What "ideas-about-science" should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(7), 692-720. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10105
  45. Park, E., & Hong, H.-G. (2011). Analyzing science-gifted middle school students' understandings of nature of science. Journal of Gifted/ Talented Education, 21(2), 391-405. https://doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2011.21.2.391
  46. Park, S., & Chen, Y. C. (2012). Mapping out the integration of the components of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): Examples from high school biology classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(7), 922-941. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21022
  47. Park, S., & Oliver, J. S. (2008). Revisiting the conceptualisation of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. Research in Science Education, 38(3), 261-284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9049-6
  48. Ryder, J. (2001). Identifying science understanding for functional scientific literacy. Studies in Science Education, 36(1), 1-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260108560166
  49. Schwartz, R. S., & Lederman, N. G. (2002). "It's the nature of the beast?" The influence of knowledge and intentions on learning and teaching nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(3), 205-236. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10021
  50. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
  51. Song, J., Kang, S., Kwak, Y., Kim, D., Kim, S., Na, J., ... Joung, Y. (2019). Contents and features of 'Korean Science Education Standards (KSES)' for the next generation. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 39(3), 465-478. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2019.39.3.465
  52. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Open coding. In A. Strauss & J. Corbin (Eds.), Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques (pp. 101-121). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  53. Tamir, P. (1988). Subject matter and related pedagogical knowledge in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4(2), 99-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(88)90011-X
  54. van Aalderen-Smeets, S. I., & Walma van der Molen, J. H. (2013). Measuring primary teachers' attitudes toward teaching science: Development of the Dimensions of Attitude towards Science (DAS) instrument. International Journal of Science Education, 35(4), 577-600 https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.755576
  55. van Aalderen-Smeets, S. I., & Walma van der Molen, J. H. (2015). Improving primary teachers' attitudes toward science by attitude-focused professional development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(5), 710-734. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21218
  56. Yacoubian, H. A. (2018). Scientific literacy for democratic decision-making. International Journal of Science Education, 40(3), 308-327. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1420266
  57. Yang, C., Kim, M., Noh, T. (2015). The influences of Integrated Science developed under the 2009 Revised National Curriculum on students' views on nature of science and Science-Technology-Society relationship, interest in science, and science aspiration. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(4), 549-555. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.4.0549
  58. Yang, S. (2019). Analysis of representations of nature of science and categorization of reflective activities in 'Scientific Inquiry and Experimentation' textbooks: Focusing on 'Scientific Inquiry in the History' chapter. (Master's dissertation). Seoul National University, Seoul.