Wind and Structures

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Parametric optimization of an inerter-based vibration absorber for wind-induced vibration mitigation of a tall building

  • Wang, Qinhua (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Shantou University) ;
  • Qiao, Haoshuai (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Shantou University) ;
  • Li, Wenji (Department of Electronic and Information Engineering, Shantou University) ;
  • You, Yugen (Department of Electronic and Information Engineering, Shantou University) ;
  • Fan, Zhun (Department of Electronic and Information Engineering, Shantou University) ;
  • Tiwari, Nayandeep (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Shantou University)
  • Received : 2019.08.02
  • Accepted : 2020.08.04
  • Published : 2020.09.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The inerter-based vibration absorber (IVA) is an enhanced variation of Tuned Mass Damper (TMD). The parametric optimization of absorbers in the previous research mainly considered only two decision variables, namely frequency ratio and damping ratio, and aimed to minimize peak displacement and acceleration individually under the excitation of the across-wind load. This paper extends these efforts by minimizing two conflicting objectives simultaneously, i.e., the extreme displacement and acceleration at the top floor, under the constraint of the physical mass. Six decision variables are optimized by adopting a constrained multi-objective evolutionary algorithm (CMOEA), i.e., NSGA-II, under fluctuating across- and along-wind loads, respectively. After obtaining a set of optimal individuals, a decision-making approach is employed to select one solution which corresponds to a Tuned Mass Damper Inerter/Tuned Inerter Damper (TMDI/TID). The optimization procedure is applied to parametric optimization of TMDI/TID installed in a 340-meter-high building under wind loads. The case study indicates that the optimally-designed TID outperforms TMDI and TMD in terms of wind-induced vibration mitigation under different wind directions, and the better results are obtained by the CMOEA than those optimized by other formulae. The optimal TID is proven to be robust against variations in the mass and damping of the host structure, and mitigation effects on acceleration responses are observed to be better than displacement control under different wind directions.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Support for this work is provided in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51208291) This support is gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. Beume, N., Naujoks, B. and Emmerich, M. (2007), "SMS-EMOA: Multiobjective selection based on dominated hypervolume", Eur. J. Oper. Res., 181(3), 1653-1669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.08.008.
  2. Cai, X., Yang, Z., Fan, Z. and Zhang, Q. (2016), "Decompositionbased-sorting and angle-based-selection for evolutionary multiobjective and many-objective optimization", IEEE Trans. Cybern., 47(9), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2016.2586191.
  3. Davenport, A.G. (1964), "Note on the random distribution of the largest value of a random function with application to gust loading", Proc. Inst. Civil Eng., 28(2), 187-196. https://doi.org/10.1680/iicep.1964.10112.
  4. De Domenico, D. and Ricciardi, G. (2017), "An enhanced base isolation system equipped with optimal tuned mass damper inerter (TMDI)", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 47(5), 1169-1192. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3011.
  5. De Domenico, D. and Ricciardi, G. (2018), "Optimal design and seismic performance of tuned mass damper inerter (TMDI) for structures with nonlinear base isolation systems", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 47(12), 2539-2560. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3098.
  6. De Domenico, D., Impollonia, N. and Ricciardi, G. (2018), "Soildependent optimum design of a new passive vibration control system combining seismic base isolation with tuned inerter damper", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 105, 37-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.11.023.
  7. Deb, K. (2002), "A fast elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II", IEEE Trans. Evol., 6 182-197. https://doi.org/10.1109/4235.996017
  8. Di Matteo, A., Furtmueller, T., Adam, C. and Pirrotta, A. (2018), "Optimal design of tuned liquid column dampers for seismic response control of base-isolated structures", Acta Mech., 229(2), 437-454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-017-1980-7.
  9. Di Matteo, A., Pirrottaa, A. and Tumminelli, S. (2017), "Combining TMD and TLCD: analytical and experimental studies", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 167, 101-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2017.04.010.
  10. Diana, G., Resta, F., Sabato, D. and Tomasini, G. (2013), "Development of a methodology for damping of tall buildings motion using TLCD devices", Wind Struct., 17(6), 629-646. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2013.17.6.629.
  11. Giaralis, A. and Marian, L. (2016). "Use of inerter devices for weight reduction of tuned mass-dampers for seismic protection of multi-storey buildings: The tuned mass-damperinterter (TMDI)", Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering.
  12. Giaralis, A. and Petrini, F. (2017a), "Wind-Induced vibration mitigation in tall buildings using the tuned mass-damperinerter", J. Struct. Eng., 143(9), 04017127. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001863.
  13. Giaralis, A. and Petrini, F. (2017b), "Optimum design of the tuned mass-damper-inerter for serviceability limit state performance in wind-excited tall buildings", Procedia Eng., 199, 1773-1778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.453.
  14. Giaralis, A. and Taflanidis, A.A. (2018), "Optimal tuned massdamper-inerter (TMDI) design for seismically excited MDOF structures with model uncertainties based on reliability criteria", Struct. Control Hlth., 25(2). e2082. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2082.
  15. Iban, A.L., Brownjohn, J.M.W., Belver, A.V., Lopez-Reyes, P.M. and Koo, K. (2013), "Numerical modelling for evaluating the TMD performance in an industrial chimney", Wind Struct., 17(3), 263-274. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2013.17.3.263.
  16. Karavasilis, T.L., Kerawala, S. and Hale, E. (2012), "Hysteretic model for steel energy dissipation devices and evaluation of a minimal-damage seismic design approach for steel buildings", J. Constr. Steel Res., 70, 358-367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2011.10.010.
  17. Kareem, A., Kijewski, T. and Tamura, Y. (1999), "Mitigation of motions of tall buildings with specific examples of recent applications", Wind Struct., 2(3), 201-251. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.1999.2.3.201
  18. Kari, L. (1979), "Dynamic vibration absorbers", Mech. Engineering publications Ltd.
  19. Lazar, I.F., Neild, S.A. and Wagg, D.J. (2014), "Using an inerterbased device for structural vibration suppression", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 43(8), 1129-1147. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2390.
  20. Leung, A., Y.T. and Zhang, H. (2009), "Particle swarm optimization of tuned mass dampers", Eng. Struct., 31(3), 715-728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.11.017
  21. Liang, S., Liu, S., Li, Q.S., Zhang, L. and Gu, M. (2002), "Mathematical model of acrosswind dynamic loads on rectangular tall buildings", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 90(12), 1757-1770. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(02)00285-4.
  22. M. Newmark, N. (1959), "A method of computation for structural dynamics", J. Eng. Mech. Div., ASCE. 85(3), 67-94. https://doi.org/10.1061/JMCEA3.0000098
  23. Marian, L. and Giaralis, A. (2015), "Optimal design of a novel tuned mass-damper-inerter (TMDI) passive vibration control configuration for stochastically support-excited structural systems", Probab. Eng. Mech., 38, 156-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2014.03.007.
  24. Min, K.W., Kim, H.S., Lee, S.H., Kim, H. and Ahn, S.K. (2005), "Performance evaluation of tuned liquid column dampers for response control of a 76-story benchmark building", Eng. Struct., 27(7), 1101-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.02.008.
  25. Ormondroyd, J. and Den Hartog, J.P. (1928), "The theory of dynamic vibration absorber", T. Amer. Soc. Mech. Eng., 50, 9-22.
  26. Papageorgiou, C. and Smith, M.C. (2006). "Laboratory experimental testing of inerters", Decision and Control, 2005 and 2005 European Control Conference.
  27. Poh'Sie, G.H., Chisari, C., Rinaldin, G., Amadio, C. and Fragiacomo, M. (2016), "Optimal design of tuned mass dampers for a multi-storey cross laminated timber building against seismic loads: Optimal design of multiple TMDs used in multi-storey CLT buildings", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 45(12), 1977-1995. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2736.
  28. Poovarodom, N., Kanchanosot, S. and Warnitchai, P. (2001), "Control of man-induced vibrations on a pedestrian bridge bynonlinear multiple tuned mass dampers", The Eighth East Asia-Pacific Conference on Structural Engineering andConstruction, Singapore, December.
  29. Poovarodom, N., Kanchanosot, S. and Warnitchai, P. (2003), "Application of non‐linear multiple tuned mass dampers to suppress man‐induced vibrations of a pedestrian bridge", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 32 1117-1131. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.265.
  30. Poovarodom, N., Mekanannapha, C. and Nawakijphaitoon, S. (2002), "Vibration problem identification of steel pedestrianbridges and control measures", Proceedings of the Third World Conference on Structural Control, Como, Italy, April.
  31. Rezaee, M. and Aly, A.M. (2016), "Vibration control in wind turbines for performance enhancement: A comparative study", Wind Struct., 22(1), 107-131. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/was.2016.22.1.107.
  32. Simiu, E. and Scanlan, R.H. (1986), Wind effects on structures : an introduction to wind engineering, Wiley New York.
  33. Spence, S. and Kareem, A. (2013), "Tall buildings and damping: A concept-based data driven model", J. Struct. Eng., 140(5). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000890.
  34. Ubertini, F. (2010), "Prevention of suspension bridge flutter using multiple tuned mass dampers", Wind Struct., 13(3), 235-256. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2010.13.3.235.
  35. Von Karman, T. (1948), "Progress in the statistical theory of turbulence", Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 34(11), 530. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.34.11.530
  36. Wang, Q., Qiao, H., Domenico, D.D., Zhu, Z. and Xie, Z. (2019), "Wind-induced response control of high-rise buildings using inerter-based vibration absorbers", Appl. Sci., 9(23), 5045. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9235045.
  37. Warburton, G.B. (1982), "Optimum absorber parameters for various combinations of response and excitation parameters", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 10(3), 381-401. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290100304.
  38. Zhou, X., Lin, Y. and Gu, M. (2015), "Optimization of multiple tuned mass dampers for large-span roof structures subjected to wind loads", Wind Struct., 20(3), 363-388. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2015.20.3.363.
  39. Zitzler, E. and Kunzli, S. (2004). "Indicator-based selection in multiobjective search", In International conference on parallel problem solving from nature. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

Cited by

  1. Comparison of Dynamic Responses of Parallel-Placed Adjacent High-Rise Buildings under Wind and Earthquake Excitations vol.2021, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6644158