DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

User Experience Validation Using the Honeycomb Model in the Requirements Development Stage

  • Received : 2020.08.12
  • Accepted : 2020.08.25
  • Published : 2020.09.30

Abstract

Recently, the importance of user experience (UX) has been rapidly increasing. Its utilization is emphasized for development of systems, products, and services. User experience is widely used across industries including services, products, processes, society, and culture. Therefore, if it is unsatisfactory, it is likely to have a direct negative impact on the corresponding system, product, or service. The failure to analyze user experience causes significant damage to the project, which may lead to its failure or redevelopment; it is hence necessary to prioritize the verification of UX in the earliest stages of development. The requirements development stage, which is a preceding stage, is an appropriate stage for the verification of user experience because the identification of user needs is completed and prototypes can be implemented. In this paper, we proposed a systematic requirements development stage; it adds user experience verification activities to the requirements development stage, using the Honeycomb model, which is a widely used tool for verifying the overall UX. User experience verification was added to the existing requirements development activities, which consisted of three steps: model definition and requirements placement, discussions between external and internal stakeholders, and review by internal stakeholders. By easily validating the user experience through this systematic requirements development stage, we expect to minimize the damage to the project due to the failure of the user experience analysis and increase the possibility of success.

Keywords

References

  1. J.S. Lee and M.J. Koo, “A Study on the Design Process based on User Experience (UX) - Mainly focused on the service cases of PHR (Personal Health Record) for Cancer Patients,” Journal of Digital Design, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 485-494, 2013. https://doi.org/10.17280/jdd.2013.13.3.047
  2. D. Norman, Emotional Design, Hakjisa, 2010.
  3. H.G. Kim and S.I. Kim, “Evaluation for User Experience about GUI of Design of Educational application - Mainly with Analysis on ‘The Cast exams on the EBS lectures’,” Journal of Digital Convergence, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 295-300, 2017. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2017.15.3.295
  4. S.C. Kim, “A Study on User Experience-based Interface Trend for the Smart Phone - Related Keyword Searches Using the URL,” Journal of Korea Design Knowledge, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 311-320, 2013.
  5. O.K. Kim and Y.J. Young, “A Convergence Study on the Chatbot (Voice-based/Messenger-based) in Mobile Shopping and User Experience in App Services,” The Korean Society of Science & Art, Vol. 37, No. 2, pp. 47-59, 2019.
  6. B. Feig, Marketing and Heart Attack so far, Shanghai People's Publishing House, 1998.
  7. K. Wiegers and J. Beatty, Software Requirements, Microsoft Press, 2013.
  8. I. Sommerville, Software Engineering, Pearson, 2016.
  9. P. Morville, “Ambient Findability,” Educational Technology Research and Development, Vol. 54, No. 6, pp. 623-626, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-006-0639-1
  10. S.H. Yoon and S.I. Kim, “Evaluation of Usability for Mobile Streaming Application - Mainly with Analysis on ‘Youtube’ and ‘Youku’,” Journal of Digital Convergence, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 705-713, 2015.