International journal of advanced smart convergence

The Institute of Internet, Broadcasting and Communication (한국인터넷방송통신학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Future Past of Humanities Research: Musing Methodology in the Digital Convergence Era

  • Kim, Jiyun (Department of English Language and Literature, Yonsei University)
  • Received : 2020.07.18
  • Accepted : 2020.08.01
  • Published : 2020.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Over the last half-century, computer science has revolutionarily changed the landscape of humanities research. This digital shift in research methodology has reached from the brainstorming process to preserving, constructing, collecting, visualizing, and even analyzing materials. Such transformation has brought about the birth of the new field of study: Digital Humanities (DH). DH undeniably has saved much of the physical chores and provided a new angle to interpret the text, thereby making its meteoric rise as a promising future of the humanities. Based on such innovation, electronic circuitry can seem to replace the imagination that detects relationships and significances of research data with ever-improving interfaces. However, despite hitherto technological development, the thousands-year-old essence of traditional liberal arts-human creativity-remains the heart of humanities research and always will. This paper starts by proving this proposition in the way of comparing the old and new liberal arts research methods, focusing on literary studies. Meanwhile, it thoroughly investigates how digitalized bibliographies, search engines, databases, and digital projects provide the most useful data preservation and virtual experience of browsing in the library, along with their limitations due to the intrinsic quality of humanities research data. Also, it probes the differences between traditional and digital data analysis in current methods of literary studies, ultimately presenting the ideal direction for humanities development in the era of digital convergence.

Keywords

References

  1. Nina Kossman, Gods and Mortals: Modern Poems on Classical Myths. Oxford UP, p. 148, 2001.
  2. Charles W. Bachman, "The Programmer as Navigator," Communications of the ACM (CACM), vol.16, no.11, pp. 653-658, Jan. 1973. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/355611.362534.
  3. Richard Altick and Jon J. Fenstermaker, The Art of Literary Research, 4th ed., W.W. Norton & Company, pp. 181, 1993.
  4. Sungbin Park, Jong-Yong Lee, and Kye-Dong Jung, "The Design of Library System using the Cloud Environment Based on the Raspberry pi," ," International Journal of Advanced Smart Convergence (IJASC), vol.4, no.1, pp.31-34, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7236/IJASC.2015.4.1.31
  5. Thomas Mann, Library Research Methods. Oxford UP, pp.73, 1987.
  6. Toshiro Minami and Kensuke Baba, "A study on Finding Potential Group of Patrons from Library's Loan Records," International Journal of Advanced Smart Convergence (IJASC), vol.2, no.2, pp.23-26, 2013. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7236/IJASC.2013.2.2.23
  7. J. Greg Matthews, Literary Research and Irish Literature: Strategies and Sources. Scarecrow Press, pp.123-155, 2009.
  8. Matthew G. Kirschenbaum, "What Is Digital Humanities and What's It Doing in English Departments?" Defining Digital Humanities: A Reader, Ed. M. Terras, J. Nyhan, and E. Vanhoutte. Ashgate, pp.195-204, 2013.
  9. James Joyce, Dubliners: Authoritative Text, Contexts, Criticism, Ed. Margot Norris, W. W. Norton, p. ix, 2006.
  10. Franco Moretti, Distant Reading. Verso, pp.217, 2013.
  11. Leighton Evans and Sian Rees, "An interpretation of Digital Humanities," Understanding Digital Humanities, Ed. D.M. Berry, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 21-41, 2012.
  12. Martin Paul Eve, Close Reading with Computers: Textual Scholarship, Computational Formalism, and David Mitchell's Cloud Atlas, Stanford UP, pp.69, 2019.
  13. Katherine Bode and Tara Murphy, "Methods and Canons: An Interdisciplinary Excursion," Advancing Digital Humanities: Research, Methods, Theories, Ed. P.L. Arthur and K. Bode, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 175-193, 2014.
  14. Mark Alfano, "Digital Humanities for History of Philosophy: A Case Study on Nietzsche," Research Methods for the Digital Humanities, Ed. I. Ievenberg, T. Neilson, and D. Rheams, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 85-101, 2018.
  15. Charles L. Gilreath, Computerized Literature Searching: Research Strategies and Databases, Westview Press, pp.143, 1984.
  16. Geoffrey Rockwell and Steefan Sinclair, Hermeneutica: Computer-Assisted Interpretation in the Humanities, The MIT Press, pp.7-95, 2016.
  17. Rene Descartes, Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy, Tr. D. A. Cress, 4th ed., Hacket Publishing Company, Inc., pp.7, 1998.
  18. Etienne Brunet, "L'exploitation des grands corpus: Le bestiaire de la litterature francaise," Literary and Linguistic Computing (L&LC), vol.4, no.2, pp. 121-134, 1989. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/4.2.121.
  19. Willard McCarty, "Beyond the Word: Modeling Literary Context," 2007. http://www.mccarty.org.uk/essays/McCarty,%20Beyond%20the%20word.pdf.
  20. Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Ed. Bertrand Russell, The Humanities Press, pp.189, 1951.