DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A network approach to local water management for building collaborative water governance: the case of Jeju special self-governing province

지방자치단체의 협력적 물 거버넌스 구축을 위한 네트워크 분석: 제주특별자치도의 물관리 사례를 중심으로

  • Kim, Boram (Institute of Governmental Studies, Korea University) ;
  • Yang, Wonseok (Jeju Special Self-Governing Provincial Government) ;
  • Ahn, Jongho (Korea Environment Institute)
  • 김보람 (고려대학교 정부학연구소) ;
  • 양원석 (제주특별자치도청 환경보전국) ;
  • 안종호 (한국환경정책.평가연구원 물국토연구본부)
  • Received : 2020.08.04
  • Accepted : 2020.08.20
  • Published : 2020.09.30

Abstract

This study aims to explore structural properties and central actors of the local water policy system through a network approach, and to suggest practical implications for establishing collaborative water governance at the local level. Especially, this study conducts a social network analysis to empirically analyze the actors' roles and relationships of water management in Jeju Special Self-Governing Province and represent them with sociograms. In this study, the local water management network is divided into two dimensions: official work network, public-private policy network based on information-sharing and consultation. Also, the networks are divided into a whole network and two sectoral networks(water-use/water-quality). This study found some meaningful differences of structural properties and central actors not only in the official work networks and the policy networks but also in the water-use networks and the water-quality networks. Thus, public managers should diagnose and manage the relational properties among multiple stakeholders in local water sector through a network perspective. In particular, (1)co-operation between the administrative departments responsible for water-use and water-quality, and (2)information-sharing and consultation among public and private stakeholders should be improved to establish collaborative local water governance.

본 연구는 네트워크 접근을 통해 지역 물관리의 구조적 특징과 주요 행위자를 밝히고 지방자치단체 차원의 협력적 물 거버넌스 구축을 위한 함의를 도출한다. 이를 위해 본 연구는 사회연결망분석(social network analysis)을 활용하여 제주특별자치도 물관리 네트워크의 주요 행위자와 이들의 역할 및 관계를 실증적으로 분석하고 소시오그램(sociogram)으로 도식화한다. 연구결과, 제주지역의 행정부서 간 물관리 업무 네트워크와 민·관 정책네트워크(정보 공유 및 협의), 전체 네트워크와 이수 및 수질 영역별 네트워크의 구조적 특징과 중심 행위자가 상이한 것으로 나타났다. 향후 지방자치단체의 협력적 물 거버넌스 구축을 위해서는 이수 및 수질 담당 행정부서 간 협업관계를 개선하고, 공공·민간 부문을 포함한 전체 이해관계자 간 정보 공유 및 협의가 활성화되어야 한다. 이처럼 지역 물관리 이해관계자 간의 공식적·비공식적 네트워크를 관리하기 위한 정책적 노력이 중요하다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bae, J.H. (2010). "A study of the network governance of local government: A focus on a Busan river protection movement." Korean Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 48, No. 3, pp. 195-221.
  2. Borgatti, S.P., Mehra, A., Brass, D.J., and Labianca, G. (2009). "Network analysis in the social sciences." Science, Vol. 323, No. 5916, pp. 892-895. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1165821
  3. Brown, R.R. (2008). "Local institutional development and organizational change for advancing sustainable urban water futures." Environmental Management, Vol. 41, No. 2, pp. 221-233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-007-9046-6
  4. Choi, C.H. (2006). "A study on the informal networks in organizations: An application of social network analysis." Korean society and public administration, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 1-23.
  5. Choi, H.S., and Hong, S.M. (2004). "Analyzing changes in the governance of water supply: From policy community to issue network." Korean Public Administration Quarterly, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 49-79.
  6. Freeman, L.C. (1978). "Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification." Social Networks, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 215-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7
  7. Han, J.Y., and Yun, S.J. (2011). "Policy networks among actors concerning introduction of greenhouse gas emission trading scheme in Korea: Based on social network analysis." Korean Policy Studies Review, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 81-108.
  8. Hanneman, R.A., and Riddle, M. (2011). "Concepts and measures for basic network analysis." The SAGE Handbook of Social Network Analysis, Edited by Scott, J., and Carrington, P.J., SAGE publications, London, U.K., pp. 340-369.
  9. Kang, M.G., Lee, K.M., Ko, I.H., and Jeong, C.Y. (2008). "Development of a integrated indicator system for evaluating the state of watershed management in the context of river basin management using factor analysis." Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, Vol. 41, No. 3, pp. 277-291. https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2008.41.3.277
  10. Kim, B.R., Yang, W.S., and Ahn, J.H. (2020). "A study on local administrative organization diagnosis for water management: Lessons from experience in the case of Jeju specia self-governing province." Korean Society and Public Administration, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 71-104.
  11. Kim, C.M., Seo, S.H., and Kim, T.Y. (2014). "A study on the household waste i nformation n etwork u sing s ocial network a nalysis: With application for Nowon-gu, Seoul metropolitan city." Journal of Environmental Policy and Administration, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 113-136.
  12. Kim, C.S. (2018). "An analysis on the water governance in the Netherlands." Korean Governance Review, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 211-235. https://doi.org/10.17089/kgr.2018.25.1.008
  13. Kim, M.S., Kim, J.H., Chang, C.Y., and Jang, J.R. (2013). "A social network analysis on stakeholders of watershed management in Saemanguem area." ECO, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 227-274.
  14. Ko, K.K. (2007). "The review of studies on policy network and the application of social network analysis." Korean Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 45, No. 1, pp. 137-164.
  15. Koh, J.K., and Lee, M.H. (2010). "A social network analysis of the characteristics of local environmental governance." Korean Policy Studies Review, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 151-181.
  16. Lee, J.H., Kim, H.S., Hong, I.P., Kang, B.S., and Kim, K.H. (2008). "Governance for the negotiation and management of water resources related conflicts." Journal of Wetlands Research, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 97-103.
  17. Lee, J.H., Lee, C.S., and Kim, G.H. (2014). "A consensus-building support system for water environment governance based on multi-criteria decision making." Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, Vol. 47, No. 7, pp. 573-585. https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2014.47.7.573
  18. Lee, K.S., Chung, E.S., and Kim, Y.O. (2006). "Integrated approach for watershed management in an urban area." Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, Vol. 39, No. 2, pp. 161-178. https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2006.39.2.161
  19. Lee, Y.H., and Kwon, G.H. (2013). "Study of policy making process in adopting emission trading scheme in Korea: Applying advocacy coalition framework and social network analysis." Korean Policy Studies Review, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 1-29.
  20. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2011). Water Governance in OECD Countries: A Multi-level Approach. OECD Studies on Water, OECD Publishing, Paris, France.
  21. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2015). OECD Principles on Water Governance, accessed 29 July 2020, .
  22. O'Toole, L.J.Jr. (1997). "Treating networks seriously: Practical and research-based agendas in public administration." Public Administration Review, Vol. 57, No. 1, pp. 45-52. https://doi.org/10.2307/976691
  23. Park, Y.S. (2004). "A study on the dynamic taxonomy of policy network in watershed policy makings." Korean Society and Public Administration, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 99-128.
  24. Provan, K.G., Veazie, M.A., Staten, L.K., and Teufel‐Shone, N.I. (2005). "The use of network analysis to strengthen community partnerships." Public Administration Review, Vol. 65, No. 5, pp. 603-613. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00487.x
  25. Schneider, V. (1992). "The structure of policy networks: A comparison of the 'Chemicals control' and 'Telecommunications' policy domains in Germany." European Journal of Political Research, Vol. 21, No. 12, pp. 109-129. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1992.tb00291.x
  26. Scott, J. (2017). Social Network Analysis, Fourth Edition. SAGE publications, London, U.K.