Korean Journal of Environmental Agriculture (한국환경농학회지)

The Korean Society of Environmental Agriculture (한국환경농학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Characteristics of Greenhouse Gas Emissions with Different Combination Rates of Activated Rice Hull Biochar during Aerobic Digestion of Cow Manure

왕겨 활성 바이오차 혼합 비율에 따른 우분 호기소화 시 온실가스 발생 특성

  • Ro, YeonHee (Department of Environmental Energy Engineering, Graduate School, Kyonggi University) ;
  • Chung, WooJin (Department of Environmental Energy Engineering, College of Creative Engineering, Kyonggi University) ;
  • Chung, SeokJoo (Nousbo Co., Ltd) ;
  • Jung, InHo (Nousbo Co., Ltd) ;
  • Na, HongSik (Nousbo Co., Ltd) ;
  • Kim, MinSoo (Department of Environmental Engineering, University of Seoul) ;
  • Shin, JoungDu (Climate Change & Agroecology Division, Department of Agricultural Environment, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration)
  • 노연희 (경기대학교 일반대학원 환경에너지공학과) ;
  • 정우진 (경기대학교 창의공과대학 환경에너지공학과) ;
  • 정석주 ((주)누보) ;
  • 정인호 ((주)누보) ;
  • 나홍식 ((주)누보) ;
  • 김민수 (서울시립대학교 환경공학과) ;
  • 신중두 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원 농업환경부 기후변화생태과)
  • Received : 2020.08.19
  • Accepted : 2020.09.02
  • Published : 2020.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Among the biomass conversion techniques of livestock manure, composting process is a method of decomposing organic matter through microorganisms, and converting it into fertilizer in soil. The aerobic composting process is capable of treating cow manure in large quantities, and produces greenhouse gas as CO2 and N2O, although it has economical benefit. By using the activated rice hull biochar, which is a porous material, it was intended to mitigate the greenhouse gas emissions, and to produce the compost of which quality was high. Objective of this experiment was to estimate CO2 and N2O emissions through composting process of cow manure with different cooperated biochar contents. METHODS AND RESULTS: The treatments of activated rice hull biochar were set at 0%, 5%, 10% and 15%, respectively, during composting cow manure. The CO2 emission in the control was 534.7 L kg-1, but was 385.5 L kg-1 at 15% activated rice hull biochar. Reduction efficiency of CO2 emission was estimated to be 28%. N2O emission was 0.28 L kg-1 in the control, but was 0.03 L min-1 at 15% of activated rice hull biochar, estimating about 89% reduction efficiency. CONCLUSION: Greenhouse gas emissions during the composting process of cow manure can be reduced by mixing with 15% of activated rice hull biochar for eco-friendly compost production.

Keywords

References

  1. Lee SH, Jeong GH, Lee DJ, Lee DH, Kwang JH (2020) Evaluation of parameters affecting composting of Hanwoo manure. Journal of Korea Society of Waste Management, 37(2), 124-132. https://doi.org/10.9786/kswm.2020.37.2.124.
  2. Jeon CJ, Park SY, OH DY, Jang ES, Song HW (2017) Estimation of characteristics treatment for food waste using ultra thermophilic aerobic composting process. Journal of the Korea Organic Resources Recycling Association, 25(1), 23-33, https://doi.org/10.17137/korrae.2017.25.1.23.
  3. Noorollahi Y, Kheirrouz M, Farabi-Asl H, Yousefi H, Hajinezhad A (2015) Biogas production potential from livestock manure in Iran. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 50, 748-754, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.190.
  4. Qian X, Shen G, Wang Z, Guo CX, Liu Y, Lei Z, Zhang Z (2014) Co-composting of livestock manure with rice straw: Characterization and establishment of maturity evaluation system. Waste Management, 34(2), 530-535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2013.10.007.
  5. Chan YC, Shnha RK, Wang W (2011) Emission of greenhouse gases from home aerobic composting, anaerobic digestion and vermicomposting of household wastes in Brisbane (Australia). Waste Management & Research, 29(5), 540-547. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X10375587.
  6. Chung SJ, Balasubramani R, Kim JT (2020) A study on $CO_2$ and $NH_3$ reduction during composting of chicken manure by activated carbon addition. Journal of Korea Society of Waste Management, 37(1), 69-75. https://doi.org/10.9786/kswm.2020.37.1.69.
  7. Kim SU, Choi EJ, Jeong HC, Lee JS, Hong CO (2017) The influence of composted animal manure application on nitrous oxide emission from upland soil. Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer, 50(6), 530-537. https://doi.org/10.7745/KJSSF.2017.50.6.530.
  8. Lee HG, Cho JS, Park HG, Heo JS (2001) Effect of zeolite and livestock manure in composting materials on composting of seafood processing wastewater sludge. Journal of the Korea Organic Resources Recycling Association, 9(2), 93-100.
  9. Jiang T, Ma X, Tang Q, Yang J, Li G, Schuchardt F (2016) Combined use of nitrification inhibitor and struvite crystallization to reduce the $NH_3$ and $N_2O$ emissions during composting. Bioresource Technology, 217, 210-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.01.089.
  10. Akdeniz N (2019) A systematic review of biochar use in animal waste composting. Waste Management, 88, 291-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.03.054.
  11. Kumagai S, IKAWA K, Takeda K (2006) Ammonia gas adsorption by carbonized rice husk. International Journal of the Society of Materials Engineering for Resources, 13(2), 92-95. https://doi.org/10.5188/ijsmer.13.92.
  12. Witter E, Lopez-Real J (1988) Nitrogen losses during the composting of sewage sludge, and the effectiveness of clay soil, zeolite, and compost in adsorbing the volatilized ammonia. Biologicla Wastes, 23(4), 279-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/0269-7483(88)90016-X.
  13. Igalavithana AD, Choi SW, Dissanayake PD, Shang J, Wang CH, Yang X, Kim SM, Tsang DCW, Lee KB, Ok YS (2020) Gasification biochar from biowaste (food waste and wood waste) for effective $CO_2$ adsorption. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 391, 121147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121147.
  14. Jung S, Park YK, Kwon EE (2019) Strategic use of biochar for $CO_2$ capture and sequestration. Journal of $CO_2$ Utilication, 32, 128-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2019.04.012.
  15. Hagemann N, Kammann CI, Schmidt HP, Kappler A, Behrens S (2017) Nitrate capture and slow release in biochar amended compost and soil. PloS One, 12(2), e0171214. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171214.
  16. Godlewska P, Schmidt HP, Ok YS, Oleszcuk P (2017) Biochar for composting improvement and contaminants reduction. A review, Bioresource Technology, 246, 193-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.07.095.
  17. Jia X, Want M, Yuan W, Ju X, Yang BZ (2016) The influence of biochar addition on chicken manure composting and associated methane and carbon dioxide emissions. BioResource, 11(2), 5255-5264.
  18. Woo SH (2013) Biochar for soil carbon sequestration. Clean Technologies, 19(3), 201-211. https://doi.org/10.7464/ksct.2013.19.3.201.
  19. Chen W, Liao X, Wu Y, Jiang JB, Mi J, Huang J, Zhang H, Wu Y, Qiao Z, Li X, Wang Y (2017) Effects of different types of biochar on methane and ammonia mitigation during layer namure composting. Waste Management, 61, 506-515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.01.014.
  20. Park SH (1999) Effect of the lowest setting temperature and mixing condition on aerobic composting of food wastes in vessel system. Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 8(1), 21-34.
  21. Choi YS, Hong SG, Kim SC, Shin JD (2015) Adsorption characteristics of aqueous phosphate using biochar derived from oak tree. Journal of the Korea Organic Resources Recycling Association, 23(3), 60-67. https://doi.org/10.17137/korrae.2015.23.3.060.
  22. Kizito S, Wu S, Kipkemoi Kirui W, Lei M, Lu Q, Bah H, Dong R (2015) Evaluation of slow pyrolyzed wood and rice husks biochar for adsorptionof ammonium nitrogen from piggery manure anaerobic digestate slurry. Science of The Total Environment, 505, 102-112, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.09. 096.
  23. Phuong NTK, Khoi CM, Ritz K, Sinh NV, Tarao M, Toyota K (2020) Potential use of rice husk biochar and compost to improve P availability and reduce GHG emissions in acid sulfate soil. Agronomy, 10(5), 685. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10050685.