Korean Journal of Environmental Agriculture (한국환경농학회지)

The Korean Society of Environmental Agriculture (한국환경농학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Determination of Regression Model for Estimating Root Fresh Weight Using Maximum Leaf Length and Width of Root Vegetables Grown in Reclaimed Land

간척지 재배 근채류의 최대 엽장과 엽폭을 이용한 지하부 생체중 추정용 회귀 모델 결정

  • Jung, Dae Ho (Horticultural and Herbal Crop Environment Division, National Institute of Horticultural and Herbal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Yi, Pyoung Ho (Horticultural and Herbal Crop Environment Division, National Institute of Horticultural and Herbal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Lee, In-Bog (Horticultural and Herbal Crop Environment Division, National Institute of Horticultural and Herbal Science, Rural Development Administration)
  • 정대호 (농촌진흥청 국립원예특작과학원 원예특작환경과) ;
  • 이평호 (농촌진흥청 국립원예특작과학원 원예특작환경과) ;
  • 이인복 (농촌진흥청 국립원예특작과학원 원예특작환경과)
  • Received : 2020.07.11
  • Accepted : 2020.07.31
  • Published : 2020.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Since the number of crops cultivated in reclaimed land is huge, it is very difficult to quantify the total crop production. Therefore, a non-destructive method for predicting crop production is needed. Salt tolerant root vegetables such as red beets and sugar beet are suitable for cultivation in reclaimed land. If their underground biomass can be predicted, it helps to estimate crop productivity. Objectives of this study are to investigate maximum leaf length and weight of red beet, sugar beet, and turnips grown in reclaimed land, and to determine optimal model with regression analysis for linear and allometric growth models. METHODS AND RESULTS: Maximum leaf length, width, and root fresh weight of red beets, sugar beets, and turnips were measured. Ten linear models and six allometric growth models were selected for estimation of root fresh weight and non-linear regression analysis was conducted. The allometric growth model, which have a variable multiplied by square of maximum leaf length and maximum leaf width, showed highest R2 values of 0.67, 0.70, and 0.49 for red beets, sugar beets, and turnips, respectively. Validation results of the models for red beets and sugar beets showed the R2 values of 0.63 and 0.65, respectively. However, the model for turnips showed the R2 value of 0.48. The allometric growth model was suitable for estimating the root fresh weight of red beets and sugar beets, but the accuracy for turnips was relatively low. CONCLUSION: The regression models established in this study may be useful to estimate the total production of root vegetables cultivated in reclaimed land, and it will be used as a non-destructive method for prediction of crop information.

Keywords

References

  1. McCurdy MK (1988) Public trust protection for wetlands. Environmental Law, 19, 683.
  2. Lee JE, Yun SI (2014) Effects of compost and gypsum on soil water movement and retention of a reclaimed tidal land. Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer, 47, 340-344. https://doi.org/10.7745/kjssf.2014.47.5.340.
  3. Munns R, Termaat A (1986) Whole-plant responses to salinity. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 3, 143-160. https://doi.org/10.1071/pp9860143.
  4. Zeng L, Shannon MC, Lesch SM (2001) Timing of salinity stress affects rice growth and yield components. Agricultural Water Management, 48, 191-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-3774(00)00146-3.
  5. Shim SI, Lee SG, Kang BH (1998) Screening of saline tolerant plants and development of biological monitoring technique for saline stress. II. responses of emergence and early growth of several crop species to saline stress. Korean Journal of Environmental Agriculture, 17, 122-126.
  6. Jo JY, Sung HY, Chun JH, Park JS, Park SU, Park YJ, Kim SJ (2018) Effects of electro-conductivity on growth of beet and turnip in the reclaimed land soil. Korean Journal of Environmental Agriculture, 37, 197-206. https://doi.org/10.5338/kjea.2018.37.3.25.
  7. Greenway H, Muuns R (1980) Mechanisms of salt tolerance in nonhalophytes. Annual Review of Plant Physiology, 31, 149-190. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pp.31.060180.001053.
  8. Lim WJ, Sonn YK, Yoon YM (2010) The selection of yield response model of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris var. Aaron) to nitrogen fertilizer and pig manure compost in reclaimed tidal land soil. Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer, 43, 174-179.
  9. Park KW, Kang HM, Park YG (1996) Effects of nutrient concentrations for each growing stages on beet (Beta vulgaris L. cv. Detroit) growth. Journal of Biological Production Facilities and Environment Control, 5, 138-144.
  10. Kim KH, Lee SA, Yook HS (2007) Effects of gamma irradiation on physicochemical properties of red beet and stability of betalain in the red beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Journal of the Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition, 36, 453-457. https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2007.36.4.453.
  11. Yi MR, Hee KC, Bu HJ (2017) Antioxidant and antiinflammatory activity of extracts from red beet (Beta vulagaris) root. Korean Journal of Food Preservation, 24, 413-420. https://doi.org/10.11002/kjfp.2017.24.3.413.
  12. Bor M, Ozdemir F, Turkan I (2003) The effect of salt stress on lipid peroxidation and antioxidants in leaves of sugar beet Beta vulgaris L. and wild beet Beta maritima L. Plant Science, 164, 77-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0168-9452(02)00338-2.
  13. Ghoulam C, Foursy A, Fares K (2002) Effects of salt stress on growth, inorganic ions and proline accumulation in relation to osmotic adjustment in five sugar beet cultivars. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 47, 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0098-8472(01)00109-5.
  14. Medina-Ruiz CA, Mercado-Luna IA, Soto-Zarazua GM, Torres-Pacheco I, Rico-Garcia E (2011) Mathematical modeling on tomato plants: a review. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 6, 6745-6749. https://doi.org/10.5897/ajarx11.001.
  15. Williams LE (1987) Growth of 'Thompson Seedless' grapevines. I. leaf area development and dry weight distribution. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 112, 325-330.
  16. Cho YY, Oh S, Oh MM, Son JE (2007) Estimation of individual leaf area, fresh weight, and dry weight of hydroponically grown cucumbers (Cucumis sativus L.) using leaf length, width, and SPAD value. Scientia Horticulturae, 111, 330-334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2006.12.028.
  17. Montero FJ, de Juan JA, Cuesta A, Brasa A (2000) Nondestructive methods to estimate leaf area in Vitis vinifera L. HortScience, 35, 696-698. https://doi.org/10.21273/hortsci.35.4.696.
  18. Jung DH, Cho YY, Lee JG, Son JE (2016) Estimation of leaf area, leaf fresh weight, and leaf dry weight of Irwin mango grown in greenhouse using leaf length, leaf width, petiole length, and SPAD value. Protected Horticulture and Plant Factory, 25, 146-152. https://doi.org/10.12791/ksbec.2016.25.3.146.
  19. Kuyah S, Dietz J, Muthuri C, Jamnadass R, Mwangi P, Coe R, Neufeldt H (2012) Allometric equations for estimating biomass in agricultural landscapes: I. aboveground biomass. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 158, 216-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2012.05.011.
  20. Wilson JB (1988) A review of evidence on the control of shoot:root ratio, in relation to models. Annals of Botany, 61, 433-449. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a087575.
  21. Mugasha WA, Eid T, Bollandsås OM, Malimbwi RE, Chamshama SAO, Zahabu E, Katani JZ (2013) Allometric models for prediction of above- and belowground biomass of trees in the miombo woodlands of Tanzania. Forest Ecology and Management, 310, 87-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.08.003.
  22. Barnes A (1979) Vegetable plant part relationships. II. a quantitative hypothesis for shoot/storage root development. Annals of Botany, 43, 487-499. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a085659.
  23. Zianis D, Muukkonen P, Makipaa R, Mencuccini M (2005) Biomass and stem volume equations for tree species in Europe. Silva Fennica Monograph, 4, 1-63.
  24. Henry M, Picard N, Trotta C, Manlay RJ, Valentini R, Bernoux M, Saint-Andre L (2011) Estimating tree biomass of sub-Saharan African forests: a review of available allometric equations. Silva Fennica, 45, 477-569. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.38.
  25. El-Sherbeny MR, da Silva JAT (2013) Foliar treatment with proline and tyrosine affect the growth and yield of beetroot and some pigments in beetroot leaves. Journal of Horticultural Research, 21, 95-99. https://doi.org/10.2478/johr-2013-0027.
  26. Giaquinta RT (1979) Sucrose translocation and storage in the sugar beet. Plant Physiology, 63, 828-832. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.63.5.828.
  27. Kandil AA, Badawi MA, El-Moursy SA, Abdou UMA (2004) Effect of planting dates, nitrogen levels and bio-fertilization treatments on 1: growth attributes of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris, L.). Scientific Journal of King Faisal University (Basic and Applied Science), 5, 227-236.
  28. Ju HY, Chong C, Bible BB (1982) Influence of boron nutrition on glucosinolates and reducing sugars of turnip. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 62, 1037-1042. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps82-153.
  29. El-Sherbeny SE, Hendawy SF, Yousserf AA, Naguib NY, Hussein MS (2012) Response of turnip (Brassica rapa) plants to minerals or organic fertilizers treatments. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 8, 628-634.
  30. Jackson DS, Chittenden J (1981) Estimation of dry matter in Pinus radiata root systems I. individual trees. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science, 11, 164-182.
  31. Thornley JHM (1969) A model to describe the partitioning of photosynthate during vegetative plant growth. Annals of Botany, 33, 419-430. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a084601.
  32. Thornley JHM (1972) A balanced quantitative model for root:shoot ratios in vegetative plant. Annals of Botany, 36, 431-441. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a084602.
  33. Verwijst T, Nordh N (1992) Non-destructive estimation of biomass of Salix dasyclados. Bioresource Technology, 41, 59-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-8524(92)90099-j.
  34. Antunes WC, Pompelli MF, Carretero DM, DaMatta FM (2008) Allometric models for non-destructive leaf area estimation in coffee (Coffea arabica and Coffea canephora). Annals of Applied Biology, 153, 33-40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.2008.00235.x.
  35. Eitel JUH, Magney TS, Vierling LA, Brown TT, Huggins DR (2014) LiDAR based biomass and crop nitrogen estimates for rapid, non-destructive assessment of wheat nitrogen status. Field Crops Research, 159, 21-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2014.01.008.