Journal of Research and Publication Ethics (연구윤리)

Korea Distribution Science Association (한국유통과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Strategies and Ethical Considerations for Scholarly Journals: A Focus on KODISA

  • SHIN, Dong Jin (Appenzeller School of Global Business, Pai Chai University)
  • Received : 2020.09.20
  • Accepted : 2020.09.30
  • Published : 2020.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine the ethical considerations that must be addressed in journals and discern the strategies that will elevate the quality of the journals. Research design, data, and methodology: This study utilized the past studies that were conducted in this field. Examples of journals were used to mark some of the key features of reputable journals, as well as the guidelines for KODISA. Results: This study has showed the importance of ethical considerations in journals for the best interests of the scholars and journal community as a whole. A clear set of outlines makes the journal a place for scholars to share their knowledge, as well as elevate the journal into a good standing in the academic world. Some of the key strategies in improving KODISA include inviting notable members of a field to share their knowledge and encouraging more scholars to contribute to this network. Conclusion: KODISA has a strong set of ethical considerations for the scholars that publish in their journals and will continue to improve its quality for the future. It includes improving its strategies and keeping up to date with the trends in the current field of discipline.

Keywords

References

  1. Bain, L. E. (2017). Ethic approval: responsibilities of journal editors, authors and research ethics committees. Pan African Medical Journal, 28, 200.
  2. Baird, P. (2003). Getting it right: industry sponsorship and medical research. CMAJ, 168(10), 1267-1269.
  3. Bekelman, J., Li, Y., & Gross, C. (2003). Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research. JAMA, 289, 454-465. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.289.4.454
  4. Cho, M., Shohara, R., Schissel, A., & Rennie, D. (2000). Policies on faculty conflicts of interest at US universities. JAMA, 284(17), 2203-2208. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.284.17.2203
  5. Emanuel, E. J., Wendler, D., & Grady, C. (2000). What makes clinical research ethical. JAMA, 283(20), 2701-2711. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.283.20.2701
  6. Graf, C., Wager, E., Bowman, A., Flack, S., Scott-Lichter, D., & Robinson, A. (2007). Best practice guidelines on publication ethics: A publisher's perspective. International Journal of Clinical Practice, 61, 1-26.
  7. Israrl, M., & Hay, I. (2006). Research ethics for social scientists. London: Sage.
  8. Munung, N. S., Che, C. P., Ouwe-Missi-Oukem-Boyer, O., & Tangwa, G. W. (2011). How often are ethics approval and informed consent reported in publications on health research in Cameroon? A five-year review. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics, 6(3), 93-97. https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2011.6.3.93
  9. Munung, N. S., Tangwa, G. W., Che, C. P., Vidal, L., & Ouwe-Missi-Oukem-Boyer, O. (2012). Are students kidding with health research ethics? The case of HIV/AIDS research in Cameroon. BMC Med Ethics, 13(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-13-12
  10. Poff, D. (2009). Reflections on ethics in journal publications. J Acad Ethics, 7, 51-55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-009-9090-3
  11. Sollitto, S., Hoffman, M., Lederman, R., Youngner, S., & Lederman, M. (2003). Intrinsic conflicts of interest in clinical research: A need for disclosure. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 13(2), 83-91. https://doi.org/10.1353/ken.2003.0015