Ocean Systems Engineering

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Prediction of a research vessel manoeuvring using numerical PMM and free running tests

  • Tiwari, Kunal (Department of Ocean Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras) ;
  • Hariharan, K. (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Pusan National University) ;
  • Rameesha, T.V. (Department of Ocean Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras) ;
  • Krishnankutty, P. (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Pusan National University)
  • Received : 2020.01.24
  • Accepted : 2020.07.18
  • Published : 2020.09.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

International Maritime Organisation (IMO) regulations insist on reduced emission of CO2, noxious and other environmentally dangerous gases from ship, which are usually let out while burning fossil fuel for running its propulsive machinery. Contrallability of ship during sailing has a direct implication on its course keeping and changing ability, and tries to have an optimised routing. Bad coursekeeping ability of a ship may lead to frequent use of rudder and resulting changes in the ship's drift angle. Consequently, it increases vessels resistance and also may lead to longer path for its journey due to zigzag movements. These adverse effects on the ship journey obviously lead to the increase in fuel consumption and higher emission. Hence, IMO has made it mandatory to evaluate the manoeuvring qualities of a ship at the designed stage itself. In this paper a numerical horizontal planar motion mechanism is simulated in CFD environment and from the force history, the hydrodynamic derivatives appearing in the manoeuvring equation of motion of a ship are estimated. These derivatives along with propeller thrust and rudder effects are used to simulate different standard manoeuvres of the vessel and check its parameters against the IMO requirements. The present study also simulates these manoeuvres by using numerical free running model for the same ship. The results obtained from both these studies are presented and discussed here.

Keywords

References

  1. Abkowitz, M.A. (1964), Lectures on ship hydrodynamics-steering and manoeuvrability.
  2. Alex, G. and Morton, G. (1962), Planar motion mechanism and system. US Patent 3,052,120.
  3. Balagopalan, A., Tiwari, K., Rameesha, T. and Krishnankutty, P. (2019), "Manoeuvring prediction of a container ship using the numerical pmm test and experimental validation using the free running model test", Ships Offshore Struct., 1-14.
  4. Broglia, R., Dubbioso, G., Durante, D. and Di Mascio, A. (2013), "Simulation of turning circle by cfd: Analysisof different propeller models and their effect on manoeuvring prediction", Appl. Ocean Res., 39, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2012.09.001
  5. Carrica, P.M., Ismail, F., Hyman, M., Bhushan, S. and Stern, F. (2013), "Turn and zigzag maneuvers of a surface combatant using a urans approach with dynamic overset grids", J. Mar. Sci. Technol., 18(2), 166-181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-012-0196-8
  6. Carrica, P.M., Mofidi, A., Eloot, K. and Delefortrie, G. (2016), "Direct simulation and experimental study ofzigzag maneuver of kcs in shallow water", Ocean Eng., 112, 117-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.12.008
  7. Cura-Hochbaum, A. (2011), "On the numerical prediction of the ship's manoeuvring behaviour. Cienciay tecnologia de buques", 5(9), 27-39. https://doi.org/10.25043/19098642.49
  8. Cura-Hochbaum, A. and Uharek, S. (2016), "Prediction of ship manoeuvrability in waves based on rans simulations", Proceedings of the 31st Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics Monterey, California.
  9. Dash, A.K., Nagarajan, V. and Sha, O.P. (2015), "Uncertainty assessment for ship maneuvering mathematica lmodel", Int. Shipbuild. Progress, 62(1-2), 57-111. https://doi.org/10.3233/ISP-150117
  10. Duman, S. and Bal, S. (2017), "Prediction of the turning and zig-zag maneuvering performance of a surface combatant with urans", Ocean Syst. Eng., 7(4), 435-460. https://doi.org/10.12989/OSE.2017.7.4.435
  11. Hirano, M., et al. (1981), "Hydrodynamic derivatives in ship maneuvering", Int. Ship Build. Progress, (325).
  12. Hooft, J., Nienhuis, U., Hutchison, B., Daidola, J., Jakobsen, B. and Ankudinov, V. (1994), "The prediction of the ship's maneuverability in the design stage. discussion. authors' closure", T. Soc. Naval Archit. Marine Engineers, 102, 419-445.
  13. Janardhanan, S. (2010), Numerical estimation of hydrodynamic derivatives in surface ship maneuvering. PhD thesis, IIT Madras.
  14. Jeong, D.H., Roh, M.I. and Ham, S.H. (2017), "Case study of detection and maneuvering performance of naval ships using engagement simulation of engineering level", Ocean Syst. Eng., 7(3), 247-273. https://doi.org/10.12989/ose.2017.7.3.247
  15. Karllstrom, C.G. and Astrom, K.J. (1981), "Experiences of system identification applied to ship steering", Automatica, 17(1), 187-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-1098(81)90094-7
  16. Kijima, K. and Nakiri, Y. (1990), Prediction method of ship manoeuvrability in deep and shallow waters.
  17. Kvale, J.M. (2014), Revised simulation model for a very large crude carrier (vlcc). Master's thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway.
  18. Lee, H.Y. and Shin, S.S. (1998), The prediction of ship's manoeuvring performance in initial design stage. In: Proceedings of the PRADS practical design of ships and other floating bodies conference, Maritime Research Institute Netherlands, The Hague, 633-639.
  19. Liu, H. and Ma, N. and Gu, X. (2015a), "Maneuvering prediction of a vlcc model based on cfd simulation for pmm tests by using a circulating water channel", Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection
  20. Liu, X. and Wan, D. (2015b), "Numerical simulation of ship yaw maneuvering in deep and shallow water", Proceedings of the 25th International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference, International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers.
  21. Mofidi, A. and Carrica, P.M. (2014), "Simulations of zigzag maneuvers for a container ship with direct movingrudder and propeller", Comput. Fluids, 96, 191-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2014.03.017
  22. Mofidi, A., Martin, J.E. and Carrica, P.M. (2018), "Propeller/rudder interaction with direct and coupled cfd/potential flow propeller approaches, and application to a zigzag manoeuvre", Ship Technol. Res., 65(1), 10-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/09377255.2017.1399970
  23. Nonaka, K., Miyazaki, H., Nimura, T., Ueno, M., Hino, T. and Kodama, Y. (2000), "Calculation of hydrodynamic forces acting on a ship in maneuvering motion", Proceedings of the International Conference on Marine Simulation and Ship Maneuvering (MARSIM), Orlando, FL, May.
  24. Ohmori, T. (1998), "Finite-volume simulation of flows about a ship in maneuvering motion", J. Marine Sci. Technol., 3(2), 82-93. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02492563
  25. Prasad, B. and Dhanak, M. (2018), "Hydrodynamics of advanced-hull surface vehicles", Proceedings of the OCEANS 2018MTS/IEEE Charleston, IEEE.
  26. Rameesha, T. and Krishnankutty, P. (2018), "Numerical study on the manoeuvring of a container ship in regular waves", Ships Offshore Struct., 1-12.
  27. Shen, Z., Wan, D. and Carrica, P.M. (2014), "Rans simulations of free maneuvers with moving rudders and propellers using overset grids in openfoam", Proceedings of the SIMMAN workshop on Verification and Validation of Ship Maneuvering Simulation Methods, Lyngby, Denmark.
  28. Shen, Z., Wan, D. and Carrica, P.M. (2015), "Dynamic overset grids in openfoam with application to kcsself-propulsion and maneuvering", Ocean Eng., 108, 287-306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.07.035
  29. Shenoi, R. (2016), Estimation of ship maneuvering hydrodynamic derivatives including roll-effects using ranse based cfd. PhD thesis, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India.
  30. Shenoi, R.R., Krishnankutty, P. and Selvam, R.P. (2016), "Study of maneuverability of container ship withnonlinear and roll-coupled effects by numerical simulations using ranse-based solver", J. Offshore Mech. Arctic Eng., 138(4), 041801. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4032895
  31. Shigunov, V., Guo, B., Reddy, D. and Lalovic, I. (2019), "Manoeuvrability in adverse conditions: Case studies", Ocean Eng., 179, 371-386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.02.026
  32. Skjetne, R., Smogeli, O. and Fossen, T.I. (2004), "Modeling, identification, and adaptive maneuvering of cy-bership II: A complete design with experiments", IFAC Proceedings, 37(10), 203-208.
  33. Son, K. and Nomoto, K. (1981), "On the coupled motion of steering and rolling of a high speed containership", J. Soc. Naval Archit. Japan, 1981(150), 232-244. https://doi.org/10.2534/jjasnaoe1968.1981.150_232
  34. Stern, F., Agdrup, K., Kim, S., Hochbaum, A., Rhee, K., Quadvlieg, F., Perdon, P., Hino, T., Broglia, R. and Gorski, J. (2011), "Experience from simman 2008-the first workshop on verification and validation of ship maneuvering simulation methods", J. Ship Res., 55(2), 135-147. https://doi.org/10.5957/jsr.2011.55.2.135
  35. Strom-Tejsen, J. (1966), "A model testing technique and method of analysis for the prediction of steering and manoeuvering qualities of surface vessels", Hydro Og Aerodynamisk Laboratorium, Rep Hy 7.

Cited by

  1. Wheel over point mathematical model vol.11, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.12989/ose.2021.11.3.203