DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Comparative Analysis Study of IFLA School Library Guidelines Using Semantic Network Analysis

언어 네트워크 분석을 통한 IFLA의 학교도서관 가이드라인 비교·분석에 관한 연구

  • 이병기 (공주대학교 사범대학 문헌정보교육과)
  • Received : 2020.05.20
  • Accepted : 2020.06.15
  • Published : 2020.06.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore semantic characteristics of IFLA school library guidelines through network analysis. There are two versions, 2002 edition and 2015 revision of the guidelines. This study analyzed the 2002 edition and 2015 revision of the IFLA school library guidelines view point of semantic network, and compared characteristics of two versions. The keywords were to extracted from two texts, semantic network were composed based on co-occurrence relations with keywords. The centrality(degree centrality, closeness centrality, betweenness centrality) was analyzed from the network. In addition, this study conducted topic modeling analysis using LDA function of NetMiner4.0. The result of this study is following these. First, When comparing the centrality, the 'Program, Teaching, Reading, Inquiry, Literacy, Media' keyword was higher in the 2015 revision than in the 2002 edition. Second, 'Inquiry' in degree centrality and 'Achievement' in closeness centrality which were not included in the 2002 edition top-ranked keyword list, have new appeared in 2015 revision. third, As a result of the analysis of topic modeling, compared to the 2002 version, the importance of topics on programs and services, teaching and learning activities of librarian teacher, and media and information literacy is increasing in the 2015 revision.

본 연구는 언어 네트워크 분석을 통해 IFLA의 학교도서관 가이드라인의 언어적 의미를 파악하는데 목적이 있다. IFLA의 학교도서관 가이드라인은 2002년 초판과 2015년에 개정한 제2판이 있다. 본 연구는 학교도서관 가이드라인의 2002년판과 2015년판을 언어 네트워크의 관점에서 분석하고, 상호 비교하였다. 대상 테스트로부터 키워드들을 추출하고 동시출현관계를 바탕으로 언어 네트워크를 구성하였다. 동시출현 네트워크로부터 중심성(연결정도 중심성, 근접 중심성, 매개 중심성)을 분석하였다. 또한, 본 연구는 넷마이너4.0의 LDA 기능을 사용하여 토픽모델링 분석을 수행하였다. 본 연구의 주요 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 중심성 차원에서 비교해 보면, 2015년판에서 'Program, Teaching, Reading, Inquiry, Literacy, Media' 등의 키워드가 2002년판에 비해 높게 나타나고 있다. 둘째, 2002년판의 중심성 상위 리스트에서 보이지 않던 'Inquiry'와 'Achievement' 키워드가 2015년판의 연결정도 중심성과 근접중심성에 새롭게 출현하고 있다. 셋째, 토픽 모델링의 분석 결과, 2002년판에 비해 2015년판은 학교도서관 서비스, 사서교사의 교수학습 활동, 미디어 및 정보활용교육, 교육과정 참여 등에 관한 토픽의 비중이 높아지고 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kim, Min-Kwan, Yong Lee and Chang Hee Han. 2017. "Analysis of Consulting Research Trends Using Topic Modeling," Journal of Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering, 40(4): 46-54. https://doi.org/10.11627/jkise.2017.40.4.046
  2. Park, Jun Hyeong and Hyo-Jung Oh. 2017. "Comparison of Topic Modeling Methods for Analyzing Research Trends of Archives Management in Korea: Focused on LDA," Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 48(4): 235-258. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.48.4.201712.235
  3. En-Core. 2019. Theories and Applications of Network Analysis. [cited 2020. 4. 20].
  4. Lee, Soo-Sang. 2016. "A Preliminary Study on the Semantic Network Analysis of Book Report Text," Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 47(3): 95-114. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.47.3.201609.95
  5. Jang, Jeong-Woo and Kyoung-Ho Choi. 2012. "Statistics Act Content Analysis Using Semantic Network Analysis," Journal of Korean Official Statistics, 17(2): 53-66.
  6. Korean Library Association. 2013. Korean Library Standards. Seoul: KLA.
  7. AASL. 2009. Guidelines for School Library Media Programs, Chicago: American Association of School Librarians.
  8. AASL. 2018. National School Library Standards for Learners, School Librarians, and School Libraries, Chicago: American Library Association.
  9. AASL, AECT. 1969. Standards for School Media Programs, Chicago: American Library Association.
  10. Blei, David M., Andrew Y. Ng and Michael I. Jordan. 2003. "Latent Dirichlet Allocation." Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3: 993-1022
  11. IASL(International Association of School Librarianship). 1999. IASL Policy Statement of School Libraries, [cited 2020. 4. 15].
  12. IFLA, 2015. IFLA School Library Guidelines, Hague, Netherlands: IFLA.
  13. IFLA, UNESCO. 2002. The IFLA/UNESCO School Library Guidelines. The Hague: International Federation of Library Associations, 2002.
  14. IFLA, UNESCO. 1999. IFLA/UNESCO School Library Manifesto: The School Library in Teaching and Learning for All, [cited 2020. 4. 15].
  15. Oberg, Dianne. 2018. "New International School Library Guidelines." Knowledge Quest, 46(5): 24-31.
  16. Wasserman, S. and Katherine Faust. 1994. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications (Structural Analysis in the Social Science; 8). Cambridge: Cambridge university press.