DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Performance analysis of S-CO2 recompression Brayton cycle based on turbomachinery detailed design

  • Zhang, Yuandong (Fundamental Science on Nuclear Safety and Simulation Technology Laboratory, Harbin Engineering University) ;
  • Peng, Minjun (Fundamental Science on Nuclear Safety and Simulation Technology Laboratory, Harbin Engineering University) ;
  • Xia, Genglei (Fundamental Science on Nuclear Safety and Simulation Technology Laboratory, Harbin Engineering University) ;
  • Wang, Ge (Beijing Institute of Control and Engineering) ;
  • Zhou, Cheng (Beijing Institute of Control and Engineering)
  • Received : 2019.11.06
  • Accepted : 2020.02.24
  • Published : 2020.09.25

Abstract

The nuclear reactor coupled with supercritical carbon dioxide (S-CO2) Brayton cycle has good prospects in generation IV reactors. Turbomachineries (turbine and compressor) are important work equipment in circulatory system, whose performances are critical to the efficiency of the energy conversion system. However, the sharp variations of S-CO2 thermophysical properties make turbomachinery performances more complex than that of traditional working fluids. Meanwhile, almost no systematic analysis has considered the effects of turbomachinery efficiency under different conditions. In this paper, an in-house code was developed to realize the geometric design and performance prediction of S-CO2 turbomachinery, and was coupled with systematic code for Brayton cycle characteristics analysis. The models and methodology adopted in calculation code were validated by experimental data. The effects of recompressed fraction, pressure and temperature on S-CO2 recompression Brayton cycle were studied based on detailed design of turbomachinery. The results demonstrate that the recompressed fraction affects the turbomachinery characteristic by changing the mass flow and effects the system performance eventually. By contrast, the turbomachinery efficiency is insensitive to variation in pressure and temperature due to almost constant mass flow. In addition, the S-CO2 thermophysical properties and the position of minimum temperature difference are significant influential factors of cyclic performance.

Keywords

References

  1. E.G. Feher, The supercritical thermodynamic power cycle, Energy Convers. 8 (2) (1967) 85-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7480(68)90105-8
  2. Vaclav Dostal, Hejzlar, et al., High-performance supercritical carbon dioxide cycle for next-generation nuclear reactors, Nucl. Technol. 154 (3) (2006) 265-282. https://doi.org/10.13182/NT154-265
  3. Y.L. Moullec, Conceptual study of a high efficiency coal-fired power plant with $CO_2$ capture using a supercritical $CO_2$ Brayton cycle, Energy 49 (1) (2013) 32-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2012.10.022
  4. H.H. Zhu, K. Wang, Y.L. He, Thermodynamic analysis and comparison for different direct-heated supercritical $CO_2$ Brayton cycles integrated into a solar thermal power tower system, Energy 140 (10) (2017) 144-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.08.067
  5. J.I. Linares, A. Cantizano, B.Y. Moratilla, et al., Supercritical $CO_2$ Brayton power cycles for DEMO (demonstration power plant) fusion reactor based on dual coolant lithium lead blanket, Energy 98 (2016) 271-283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.01.020
  6. V. Dostal, P. Hejzlar, M.J. Driscoll, The supercritical carbon dioxide power cycle: comparison to other advanced power cycles, Nucl. Technol. 154 (3) (2006) 283-301. https://doi.org/10.13182/NT06-A3734
  7. F. Crespi, G. Gavagnin, D. Sanchez, et al., Supercritical carbon dioxide cycles for power generation: a review, Appl. Energy 195 (2017) 152-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.02.048
  8. Y. Ahn, S.J. Bae, M. Kim, et al., Review of supercritical $CO_2$ power cycle technology and current status of research and development, Nuclear Engineering and Technology 47 (6) (2015) 647-661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2015.06.009
  9. K. Wang, Y.L. He, H.H. Zhu, Integration between supercritical $CO_2$ Brayton cycles and molten salt solar power towers: a review and a comprehensive comparison of different cycle layouts, Appl. Energy 195 (2017) 819-836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.03.099
  10. Y. Ma, M. Liu, J. Yan, et al., Thermodynamic study of main compression intercooling effects on supercritical $CO_2$ recompression Brayton cycle, Energy 140 (2017) 746-756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.08.027
  11. J. Sarkar, S. Bhattacharyya, Optimization of recompression S-$CO_2$ power cycle with reheating, Energy Convers. Manag. 50 (8) (2009) 1939-1945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2009.04.015
  12. J. Song, X. Li, X. Ren, et al., Performance analysis and parametric optimization of supercritical carbon dioxide (S-$CO_2$) cycle with bottoming Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC), Energy 143 (2018) 406-416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.10.136
  13. Q.H. Deng, D. Wang, H. Zhao, et al., Study on performances of supercritical $CO_2$ recompression Brayton cycles with multi-objective optimization, Appl. Therm. Eng. 114 (2017) 1335-1342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.11.055
  14. Y. Zhang, H. Li, W. Han, et al., Improved design of supercritical $CO_2$ Brayton cycle for coal-fired power plant, Energy 155 (2018) 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.05.003
  15. J. Lee, J.I. Lee, H.J. Yoon, et al., Supercritical carbon dioxide turbomachinery design for water-cooled small modular reactor application, Nucl. Eng. Des. 270 (2014) 76-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2013.12.039
  16. D. Luo, Y. Liu, X. Sun, et al., The design and analysis of supercritical carbon dioxide centrifugal turbine, Appl. Therm. Eng. 127 (2017) 527-535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.08.039
  17. A. Zhou, J. Song, X. Li, et al., Aerodynamic design and numerical analysis of a radial inflow turbine for the supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycle, Appl. Therm. Eng. 132 (2018) 245-255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.12.106
  18. Z. Liu, W. Luo, Q. Zhao, et al., Preliminary design and model assessment of a supercritical $CO_2$ compressor, Appl. Sci. 8 (4) (2018) 595. https://doi.org/10.3390/app8040595
  19. S. Tang, M. Peng, G. Xia, et al., Optimization design for supercritical carbon dioxide compressor based on simulated annealing algorithm, Ann. Nucl. Energy (2019) 107107.
  20. E.W. Lemmon, M.L. Huber, M.O. Mclinden, NIST Standard Reference Database 23: Reference Fluid Thermodynamic and Transport Properties-REFPROP 9.0, NIST NSRDS, 2010.
  21. O.E. Balje, Turbomachines - A Guide to Design, Selection, and Theory, John Wiley & Sons, 1981.
  22. Monje B, Sanchez D, Savill M, et al. A design strategy for supercritical $CO_2$ compressors. ASME Turbo Expo 2014: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2014: V03BT36A003- V03BT36A003.
  23. O. Conrad, K. Raif, M. Wessels, The calculation of performance maps for centrifugal compressors with vane-island diffusers, in: Performance Prediction of Centrifugal Pumps and Compressors, 1979, pp. 135-147.
  24. J.E. Coppage, F. Dallenbach, Study of Supersonic Radial Compressors for Refrigeration and Pressurization Systems, GARRETT CORP LOS ANGELES CA AIRESEARCH MFG DIV, 1956.
  25. W. Jansen, A method for calculating the flow in a centrifugal impeller when entropy gradient are present, Inst. Mech. Eng. Internal Aerodynamics (1970).
  26. J.W. Daily, R.E. Nece, Chamber Dimension Effects on Induced Flow and Frictional Resistance of Enclosed Rotating Disks, 1960.
  27. R.H. Aungier, Mean streamline aerodynamic performance analysis of centrifugal compressors, Transactions of the ASME - Journal of Turbomachinery 117 (1995) 360-366. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2835669
  28. H.W. Oh, M.K. Chung, Investigation on the Design and Performance Analysis Methods of Centrifugal Turbomachines, Ph. D. thesis, KAIST, Daejeon, South Korea, 1998.
  29. J.P. Johnston, R.C. Dean Jr., Losses in Vaneless Diffusers of Centrifugal Compressors and Pumps: Analysis, Experiment, and Design, 1966.
  30. H. Moustapha, M.F. Zelesky, N.C. Baines, et al., Axial and Radial Turbines, Concepts NREC, White River Junction, VT, 2003.
  31. M. Saeed, M.H. Kim, Analysis of a recompression supercritical carbon dioxide power cycle with an integrated turbine design/optimization algorithm, Energy 165 (2018) 93-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.09.058
  32. N.C. Baines, A. Whitfield, Design of Radial Turbomachines, Longman Scientific and Technical, Essex, UK, 1990.
  33. A.J. Glassman, Computer Program for Design Analysis of Radial-Inflow Turbines, 1976.
  34. S.A. Wright, R.F. Radel, M.E. Vernon, et al., Operation and Analysis of a Supercritical $CO_2$ Brayton Cycle, Sandia Report, 2010. No. SAND2010-0171.
  35. B.D. Iverson, T.M. Conboy, J.J. Pasch, et al., Supercritical $CO_2$ Brayton cycles for solar-thermal energy, Appl. Energy 111 (2013) 957-970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.06.020
  36. F.P. Incropera, A.S. Lavine, T.L. Bergman, et al., Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer, Wiley, 2007.
  37. J. Zhou, C. Zhang, S. Su, et al., Exergy analysis of a 1000 MW single reheat supercritical $CO_2$ Brayton cycle coal-fired power plant, Energy Convers. Manag. 173 (2018) 348-358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.07.096
  38. Z. Mohammadi, M. Fallah, S.M.S. Mahmoudi, Advanced exergy analysis of recompression supercritical $CO_2$ cycle, Energy 178 (2019) 631-643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.04.134

Cited by

  1. Operation characteristic of supercritical carbon dioxide-cooled reactor system under coordination control scheme vol.17, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1177/1729881420933833
  2. System Design and Application of Supercritical and Transcritical CO2 Power Cycles: A Review vol.9, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2021.723875