Korean Journal of Community Nutrition (대한지역사회영양학회지)

The Korean Society of Community Nutrition (대한지역사회영양학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of Nutritional Content in Convenience Store Lunchboxes by Meal Type, Price, and Store Brand

편의점 도시락의 식단형태별, 가격대별, 편의점 브랜드별 영양성분 함량 평가

  • Park, Jin-Seon (Major of Food and Nutrition, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Han, Young-Hee (Department of Food and Nutrition, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Hyun, Taisun (Department of Food and Nutrition, Chungbuk National University)
  • Received : 2020.08.21
  • Accepted : 2020.08.24
  • Published : 2020.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objectives: This study investigated the menu and nutritional contents of convenience store lunchboxes, and evaluated the nutritional content by meal type, price, and store brand. Methods: In September 2019, 93 convenience store lunchboxes from the top five franchise stores were purchased. Relevant information on price, food weight, food ingredients, cooking methods, and nutrition labeling were subsequently collected. Nutritional content was evaluated based on the daily value (DV) and Index of Nutritional Quality (INQ), and energy contribution of carbohydrate, protein, fat, saturated fat and sugar was compared with the recommended range. Results: Most lunchboxes included the food groups; grains/starches, meats/fish/eggs/legumes, and vegetables. However, none provided fruits, and only a few lunchboxes provided milk/milk products. Stir-frying, deep-frying, and pan-frying were the most frequent methods of cooking. The average energy content of the lunchboxes was 736.6 kcal, whereas the average contents of protein, fat and saturated fat were higher than 40% of the DV, and sodium content was 66.8% of the DV. The contents of most nutrients in traditional type lunchboxes were higher, as compared to nutrients in onedish type lunchboxes. Considering pricing of lunchboxes, protein and sodium contents were higher in the higher-priced lunchboxes as compared to lower-priced lunchboxes, but there were no differences in the INQs. The contents of energy, protein, fat, saturated fat, and cholesterol significantly differed by brand. Conclusions: Our results indicate that convenience store lunchboxes contain high levels of protein, fat, saturated fat, and sodium. The nutritional contents differed by meal type, price, and store brand, and higher price did not imply higher nutritional quality. We propose the need to educate consumers to check nutrition labels and purchase appropriate lunchboxes. Manufacturers also need to make efforts to reduce the amounts of fat, saturated fat, and sodium, and not provide protein in excess.

Keywords

References

  1. Kang JM. The history of Korean lunchbox: From 'the lunchbox of Lee Wan-yong' to 'the lunchbox of Lee Myung-bak'. Inmulgwasasang 2008; 9: 173-207.
  2. Park HW, Koh HY, Park NH, Kang TS, Mo SM. Optimization of the Korean packaged meal (Dosirak) production facilities for food service delivered long distance. Korean J Dietary Culture 1988; 3(1): 89-93.
  3. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety. Enforcement Decree of the Food Sanitation Act (Presidential Decree No. 12000, 1986 November 11, whole amendment) [Internet]. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety; 1986 [cited 2020 Jul 28]. Available from: http://www.law.go.kr/LSW/lsInfoP.do?lsiSeq=21646&ancYd=19861111&ancNo=12000&efYd=19861111&nwJoYnInfo=N&efGubun=Y&chrClsCd=010202&ancYnChk=0#0000.
  4. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, Korea Agro-Fisheries & Food Trade Corporation. Status of processed food market segment: lunchbox market [Internet]. Korea Agro- Fisheries and Food Trade Corporation; 2016 [cited 2020 Jul 3]. Available from: http://www.atfis.or.kr/article/M001050000/view.do?articleId=2458&page=&searchKey=&searchString=&searchCategory.
  5. Juhn SI. Convenience store sociology. Seoul: Minumsa; 2014. p. 42.
  6. Kim BR. Lunchbox fights for 1 trillion won: A big match of convenience store vs Hansot.Bon [Internet]. Korea Economic Daily; 2019 [cited 2020 Jul 29]. Available from: https://www.hankyung.com/economy/article/2019110307681.
  7. Embrain Trend Monitor. A survey of use and recognition of (convenience store) lunchbox [Internet]. Macromillembrain; 2016 [cited 2020 Jul 29]. Available from: https://www.trendmonitor.co.kr/tmweb/trend/allTrend/detail.do?bIdx=1460&code=0301&trendType=CKOREA.
  8. Hong MS, Kang HS, Myeong SH, Yoon DI. The effect of customer's selection attributes of convenience store box lunch on positive consumption emotion and customer loyalty. Food Serv Ind J 2017; 13(2): 29-44.
  9. Jin YH, Kim SO. A study on the selection attributes of convenience store PB lunch box using IPA. Culin Sci Hosp Res 2017; 23(8): 17-26.
  10. Kim JH, Kim YS, Jeon YJ. The effects of the convenience store lunch-box selection attributes on satisfaction and behavioral intentions. J Tour Leis Res 2017; 29(7): 353-370.
  11. Choi J, Park H, Song K, Kwon S, Lee Y. Menu evaluation of meal boxes sold in Korean convenience stores. J Food Nutr Res 2018; 6(1): 18-25. https://doi.org/10.12691/jfnr-6-1-4
  12. Kim SY, Choi JY. The changing role of convenience stores in South Korea. Br Food J 2019; 121(7): 1642-1654. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-07-2018-0467
  13. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety. Lunchbox: get conveniently and enjoy healthy eating. Results of a survey on sodium in commercially available lunchbox [Internet]. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety; 2019 [cited 2020 Feb 29]. Available from: https://www.mfds.go.kr/brd/m_99/view.do?seq=43480&srchFr=&srchTo=&srchWord=%EB%8F%84%EC%8B%9C%EB%9D%BD&srchTp=0&itm_seq_1=0&itm_seq_2=0&multi_itm_seq=0&company_cd=&company_nm=&Data_stts_gubun=C9999&page=1.
  14. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety. Enforcement rules of the act on labeling or advertising of foods (Prime Minister's Order No. 1535, Enacted on 2019 April 25) [Internet]. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety; 2019 [cited 2020 Feb 27]. Available from: http://www.law.go.kr/lsInfoP.do?lsiSeq=208516#0000.
  15. Ministry of Health & Welfare, The Korean Nutrition Society. Dietary reference intakes for Koreans 2015. Sejong: Ministry of Health & Welfare; 2015.
  16. Korea Fair Trade Commission. Franchise business transaction. Comparison between brands [Internet]. Korea Fair Trade Commission; 2019 [cited 2020 Jul 13]. Available from: https://franchise.ftc.go.kr/user/extra/main/70/firHope/listBrand/jsp/LayOutPage.do.
  17. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety. Labeling standards of foods, etc. (Notification No. 2020-1, 2020 January 3) [Internet]. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety; 2020 [cited 2020 Feb 27]. Available from: https://www.mfds.go.kr/brd/m_211/view.do?seq=14420.
  18. Hansen RG. An index of food quality. Nutr Rev 1973; 31(1): 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-4887.1973.tb05134.x
  19. Drewnowski A. Concept of a nutritious food: toward a nutrient density score. Am J Clin Nutr 2005; 82(4): 721-732. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/82.4.721
  20. Kim SY, Kim S. Recent surge of ready meals in South Korea: can they be healthy alternatives? Public Health Nutr 2020; 23(4): 711-720. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1368980019002544
  21. Christoforou AK, Dunford EK, Neal BC. Changes in the sodium content of Australian ready meals between 2008 and 2011. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 2013; 22(1): 138-143.
  22. Kanzler S, Hartmann C, Gruber A, Lammer G, Wagner KH. Salt as a public health challenge in continental European convenience and ready meals. Public Health Nutr 2014; 17(11): 2459-2466. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980014000731
  23. Remnant J, Adams J. The nutritional content and cost of supermarket ready-meals. Cross-sectional analysis. Appetite 2015; 92: 36-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2015.04.069
  24. Pongutta S, Chongwatpol P, Tantayapirak P, Vandevijvere S. Declaration of nutrition information on and nutritional quality of Thai ready-to-eat packaged food products. Public Health Nutr 2018; 21(8): 1409-1417. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980017003792
  25. Action on Salt. Ready meals survey [Internet]. Action on Salt; 2007 [cited 2020 Feb 26]. Available from: http://www.actiononsalt.org.uk/news/surveys/2007/ready/.
  26. Kwon KL, Park SH, Lee JH, Kim JY, Yoo KS, Lee JS et al. Prevalence of nutrition labeling and claims on processed, and packaged foods. Korean J Community Nutr 2007; 12(2): 206-213.
  27. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation. Risk assessment of trans fat [Internet]. National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation; 2016 [cited 2020 Feb 27]. Available from: http://www.nifds.go.kr/brd/m_271/view.do?seq=10116.
  28. van der Horst K, Brunner TA, Siegrist M. Ready-meal consumption: associations with weight status and cooking skills. Public Health Nutr 2011; 14(2): 239-245. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1368980010002624
  29. Alkerwi A, Crichton GE, Hebert JR. Consumption of readymade meals and increased risk of obesity: findings from the Observation of Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Luxembourg (ORISCAV-LUX) study. Br J Nutr 2015; 113(2): 270-277. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007114514003468
  30. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety. Check nutrition label of home meal replacements before you choose [Internet]. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety; 2020 [cited 2020 Feb 27]. Available from: https://www.mfds.go.kr/brd/m_99/view.do?seq=43964.
  31. Kanzler S, Manschein M, Lammer G, Wagner KH. The nutrient composition of European ready meals: protein, fat, total carbohydrates and energy. Food Chem 2015; 172: 190-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.09.075
  32. Korea Consumer Agency. Results of sandwich quality test [Internet]. Korea Consumer Agency; 2019 [cited 2020 Feb 27]. Available from: https://www.kca.go.kr/home/sub.do?menukey=4062&mode=view&no=1002853628.

Cited by

  1. Studies of Selection Attributes for Lunch Boxes (Dosirak) Using Conjoint Analysis among Single Men vol.50, pp.8, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2021.50.8.884