DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A study of nest-site characteristics and feeding behavior on Tree sparrows bred in urban artificial structures

도심내 인공구조물에서 번식하는 참새의 둥지위치 특성과 먹이급이행동 분석

  • Jeong, Seul-Gi (Environmental Assessment Group, Korea Environment Institute) ;
  • Lee, Who-Seung (Environmental Assessment Group, Korea Environment Institute)
  • 정슬기 (한국환경정책.평가연구원 환경평가본부) ;
  • 이후승 (한국환경정책.평가연구원 환경평가본부)
  • Received : 2020.07.09
  • Accepted : 2020.07.22
  • Published : 2020.08.31

Abstract

This study conducted observations at 72 traffic lights and road signs in Sejong-si, Korea from March to June 2019 in order to analyze nest-site, nest-site characteristics and feeding behavior in Tree sparrow (Passeer montanus) in urban. Feeding behavior during breeding season in 2019 was investigated at 10 Town representing traffic facilities installed on the road located in the center of the city and 10 Riverside Geumgang river's riverside road. We fitted both general linear model and regression model to our field data and estimated the spatial variation of initial date of the first feeding (i.e., being date of breeding) and the total number of caterpillar fed by parents per hour. Our results showed that the frequency of nest building on artificial structures, such as traffic lights, was about 26% higher and about 8 days earlier in the riverside. In particular, the first feeding was significantly faster when the nearest distance between nest to green field as foraging site was shorter whereas there was no significant effect of the number of nest within 50 meters on the first feeding. Number of caterpillars fed by parents was higher in the Riverside than in the Urban, and especially the number in the second brood was sharply decreased in the Urban. As we estimated average amount of caterpillars per hour to 446 traffic safety facilities in Sejong-si, it was estimated that Tree sparrows fed 18,742.8 caterpillars per hour during the breeding season. In this study, we showed that characteristics of nests built in artificial structures and feeding behavior in order to analyze effects of environmental condition in urban on life-history traits during the breeding season. Finally, we discussed the conservation of birds in urban and pest control effects.

Keywords

References

  1. Bryant, D.M.(1979) Reproductive costs in the House Martin (Delichon urbica). Journal of Animal Ecology 12: 655-675. https://doi.org/10.2307/4185
  2. Clark, P.J. and F.C. Evans(1954) Distance to nearest neighbor as a measure of spatial relationships in populations. Ecology 35: 445-453. https://doi.org/10.2307/1931034
  3. Cody, M.L.(1985) Habitat selection in birds. Academic Press, Inc., New York, 558p.
  4. Crick, H.Q.P.(2004) The impact of climate change on birds. IBIS 146: 48-56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.2004.00327.x
  5. Dobson, A.(1990) Survival rates and their relationship to life-history tratis in some common British birds. Current Perspectives in Ornithology 12: 115-146.
  6. Eguchi, K.(1980) The feeding ecology of the nestling Great tit, Parus major minor, in the temperate ever-green broadleaved forest II. with reference to breeding ecology. Researches on Population Ecology 22: 284-300. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02530852
  7. Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI)(2016) ArcGIS Release 10.4., Redlands, CA.
  8. Garcia-Navas, V., L. Arroyo and J.J. Sanz(2008) Nestbox use and reproductive parameters of Tree Sparrows Passer montanus: are they affected by the presence of old nests? Acta Ornithologica 43: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3161/068.043.0101
  9. Germain, R.R., R. Schuster, K.E. Delmore, and P. Arcese(2015) Habitat preference facilitates successful early breeding in an open-cup nesting songbird. Functional Ecology 29: 1522-1532. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12461
  10. Grieco, F.(2003) Greater food avaiability reduces tarsus asymmetry in nestling Blut tits. The Condor 105: 599-603. https://doi.org/10.1093/condor/105.3.599
  11. Isaksson, C.(2018) Impact of urbanization on birds. In: D.T. Tietze(ed.), Bird species - how they arise, modify and vanish, Springer, Cham, Switzerland, pp. 235-257.
  12. Kalinski, A., M. Banbura, M. Gladalski, M. Markowski, J. Skwarska, J. Wawrzyniak, Pi.Zielinski and J. Banbura(2019) Physiological condition of nestling great tits(Paurs major) declines with the date of brood initiation: a long term study of first clutches. Scientific Reports 9: 9843. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46263-z
  13. Kang, S.G., Hur, W.H. and Lee, I.S. (2012) Fledging Period, Types of Structure Supporting Nests and Growth Rate for Fledglings of Common Kestrel(Falco tinnunculus) in Urban Area. The Korean Journal of Ornithology 19(3): 173-183.
  14. Ki, K.S. and Cho, W(2014) Effects of Light Pollution and Environmental Factors on Dawn Song Initiation Time of Great Tit, Parus major. Korean Society of Environment and Ecology 28(4): 411-418. https://doi.org/10.13047/KJEE.2014.28.4.411
  15. Krebs, C.J.(1999) Ecological Methodology, 2nd ed. Pearson, London, 624p.
  16. Lambrechts, M.M., A. Rieux, M.J. Galan, M. Cartan-Son, P. Perret and J. Blondel(2008) Double-brooded Great tits (Parus major) in Mediterranean oak habitats: do first broods always perform better than second broods? Russian Journal of Ecology 39: 516. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1067413608070084
  17. Lee, W.S., T.H. Koo and J.Y. Park(2005) A field guide to the birds of Korea. LG Evergreen Foundation, Seoul, 330p.
  18. Lovette, I.J. and J.W. Fitzpatrick(2016) Handbook of bird biology (3rd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell, New York, 730p.
  19. Martin, T.E.(1998) Are microhabitat preferences of coexisting species under selection and adaptive? Ecology 79: 656-670. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[0656:AMPOCS]2.0.CO;2
  20. Marzluff, J.M., J.H. DeLap, M.D. Oleyar, K.A. Whittaker and B. Gardner(2016) Breeding dispersal by birds in a dynamic urban ecosystem. PLoS One 11: e0167829. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167829
  21. Meillere, A., F. Brischoux, C. Parenteau and F. Angelier(2015) Influence of urbanization on body size, condition and physiology in an urban exploiter: a multi-component approach. PLoS One 10: e0135685. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135685
  22. Mills, G.S., J.B. Dunning, Jr. and J.M. Bates(1989) Effects of urbanization on breeding bird communitiy structure in Southwestern desert habitats. The Condor 91: 416-428. https://doi.org/10.2307/1368320
  23. Minot, E.O. and C.M. Perrins(1986) Interspecific interference competition - nest sites for blue and great tits. Journal of Animal Ecology 55: 331-350. https://doi.org/10.2307/4712
  24. Naef-Daenzer, L., B. Naef-Daenzer and R.G. Nager(2000) Prey selection and foraging performance of breeding Grat tits Parus major in relation to food avaiability. Journal of Avian Biology 31: 206-214. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-048X.2000.310212.x
  25. No, S.H., Y.J. Lee, J.Y. Nam, Y.E. Shim, J.S. Koh, B.J. Jeong, H.I. Choi, S.R. Cho and Y.H. You(2015) A study on the breeding ecology and the effects of bird on entrance size in artificial wood boxes. Proceeding of Korean Society of Enironmental Ecology Conference 25: 90.
  26. Open Data Portal(2020.6.4.) Retrieved from http://www.data.go.kr/
  27. Partecke, J., T. Van't Hof, and E. Gwinneer(2004) Differences in the timing of reproduction between unban and forest European blackbirds (Turdus merula): result of phenotypic flexibility or genetic differences? Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences. 271: 1955-2001. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2004.2784
  28. Perrins, C.(1979) British tits. Collins, London, 304p.
  29. Perrins, C.M. and T.R. Birkhead(1987) Avian ecology. Blackie, Glasgow, UK, 232p.
  30. Perrins, C.M.(1965) Population fluctuations and clutch-size in the Great tit, Parus major L. Journal of Animal Ecology 34: 601-647. https://doi.org/10.2307/2453
  31. Pinowska, B., J. Pinowski and K.H. Hahm(1999) Selected aspects of breeding biology in the Tree Sparrow Passer Montanus saturatus (Stejneger, 1886) in South Korea. Acta Zoologica Cracoviensia 42: 435-446.
  32. Reynolds, S.J., J.D. Ibanez-Alamo, P. Sumasgutner and M.C. Mainwaring(2019) Urbanisation and nest building in birds: a review of threats and opportunities. Journal of Ornithology 160: 841-860. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-019-01657-8
  33. Road Sign Management System(2020.6.4.) Retrieved from http://www.roadsign.go.kr/
  34. Rosenzweig, M.L.(1981) A theory of habitat selection. Ecology 62: 327-335. https://doi.org/10.2307/1936707
  35. Samplonius, J.M., I.M. Kromhout Van Der Meer and C. Both(2017) Nest site preference depends on the relative density of conspecifics and heterospecifics in wild birds. Frontieers in Zoology 14: 56. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12983-017-0246-5
  36. Stauss, M.J., J.F. Burkhardt and J. Tomiuk(2005) Foraging flight distance as a measure of parental effort in Blue tits Parus caeruleus differ with environmental conditions. Journal of Avian Biology 36: 47-56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0908-8857.2005.02855.x
  37. Sumasgutner, P., A. Jenkins, A. Amar and R. Altwegg(2020) Nest boxes buffer the effects of climate on breeding performance in an African urban raptor. PLoS One 15: e0234503. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234503
  38. Van Noordwijk, A.J., R.H. McCleery, and C.M. Perrins(1995) Selection for the timing of Great tit breeding in relation to caterpillar growth and temperature. Journal of Animal Ecology 64: 451-458. https://doi.org/10.2307/5648
  39. Verhulst, S.(2002) Multiple breeding in the Great tit, II. The costs of rearing a second clutch. Functional Ecology 12: 132-140. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2435.1998.00165.x