DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Landscape adjective characteristics for the Major Landscape Elements in Organic farming

유기농업단지 주요경관요소의 경관형용사 특성에 관한 연구

  • An, Phil-Gyun (Rural Environment & Resources Division, National Institute of Agricultural Science) ;
  • Eom, Sung-Jun (Rural Environment & Resources Division, National Institute of Agricultural Science) ;
  • Kim, Nam-Chun (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Dankook University) ;
  • Kim, Sang-Bum (Rural Environment & Resources Division, National Institute of Agricultural Science)
  • 안필균 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원) ;
  • 엄성준 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원) ;
  • 김남춘 (단국대학교 녹지조경학과) ;
  • 김상범 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원 농촌환경자원과)
  • Received : 2020.06.01
  • Accepted : 2020.08.17
  • Published : 2020.08.31

Abstract

Up to date, the majority research on the major landscape elements in organic farming has been mainly focused on the practice of seeking efficiency. The problem is that this type of study contributes to polluting the agricultural environment and damaging the ecological circulation system. As an alternative, there is a growing body of research on organic farming, but it is not widely applied that research on how to manage the landscape considering the scenic characteristics of farming villages practicing organic farming. Hence, in this paper we utilized landscape adjectives as a way to enhance the objectivity of the organic agricultural complex landscape assessment. More specifically, not only this study used a landscape image of an organic agricultural complex to identify a landscape adjective suitable for the landscape elements but also this study confirmed the suitability of landscape adjectives comparing to the opinions of experts and the public. To carry out, this study performed the experts survey which is composed of 12 major landscape elements, including rice paddies and fields, monoculture and diverse crops, dirt roads, windbreak trees, accent planting, dum-bung(small pond), natural small river, natural waterways, plastic film houses, one-storied houses, and pavilion. As a result of deriving the landscape adjectives from the main landscape elements, there were nine landscape adjectives that were consistent with experts and the public, including "clear" and "Artless" for rice paddies and fields, while the mismatched landscape adjectives were 'traditional'. The accent planting was a combination of landscape adjectives such as 'natural' and 'clear', while the windbreak trees was a consensus of all landscape adjectives. Only two adjectives, 'friendly' and 'wild', agreed on the dirt load, nine dum-bung(small pond), ten natural small river, nine duckery, eight one-storied houses, 10 pavilion, eight monoculture and diverse crops, and three natural waterways. The most common landscape adjectives were windbreak trees, pavilions, and natural small river, all 10 landscape adjectives. However, it is considered that only three of the 10 landscape types on the dirt road and the natural number are matched. Thus, additional management measures will be needed. In addition, it was analyzed that the most common landscape adjectives were "Artless" and "friendly" 13 times. The landscape adjectives of the organic farming complex responded by experts were analyzed to be suitable for natural, clear, zingy, silent, traditional, artless, friendly, wild and Leisurely, and consistent with the general public's opinion.

Keywords

References

  1. Ban, YH (2008) Classifying Rural Landscape Types and Developing Rural Landscape Evaluation Indicators Using Expert Delphi Survey Method, Journal of the korean society of rural planning, 14(3), pp. 53-61.
  2. Chae, HS and Kim, HM (2005) A Study on the Classification of Landscape Elements for Effective Management of Agricultural Landscape. Korean J.Soc Rural Plan. 11: 1-9.
  3. Dong, SS (2012) Color Analysis of Rural Village Considering Traditional Landscape Elements: Focused on Roof Color, Kyung-He National University.
  4. Im, SB (1988) A Study on the Landscape Analysis and Evaluation Method: A Phenomenological Approach Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture, 16(1). pp. 43-51
  5. Joo, SH and Im, SB (2008) A Study for Rural Landscape Planning Criteria, Journal of the korean society of rural planning, 14(4), pp. 69-76.
  6. Jun, EB (2018) A Study on the Application of Hometown Image Element in Rural Village Landscape, Kong-Ju National University.
  7. Kim, UJ, Chea, WH, Chang, SL, Park, MJ, Choi, JA and Kwon, SC (2016) A Study on the Color Perception in Rural Villages, Korean J Community Living Sci, 27(2), pp. 573-591. https://doi.org/10.7856/kjcls.2016.27.S.573
  8. Kim, HM and Bang. BH (2006) An Analysis of the Landscape Character in Environment Friendly Cultivated Land Based on Rural Amenity. Korean J. Soc Community Living Sci. 17: 16-20.
  9. Kim, JH, Na, JH, Lee, SJ, Kwon, OS, Jo, HJ, Lee, EJ (2016) Fragmentation Analysis of Deajeon City's Green Biotope Using Landscape Index and Visualization Method. J. Korean Env. Res. Tech. 19(3): 29-44
  10. Kim, SB, Kang, BH and Kim. HM (2006) A Study on Preference and Importance of Rural Landscape Elements. Korean J. Soc Community Living Sci. 5: 136-136.
  11. Kim, UJ, Chea, WH, Chang, SL, Park, MJ, Choi, JA and Kwon, SC (2016) A Study on the Color Perception in Rural Villages, Korean J Community Living Sci, 27(2), pp. 573-591. https://doi.org/10.7856/kjcls.2016.27.S.573
  12. Kwon, OS (2013) Aesthetic Quality Analysis and Landscape Planning based on Landscapetope Classification. Kyung-pook university.
  13. Kwon, OS, Lee, HT, Ra, JH, Cho, HJ (2014) Landscape Assessment and Landscape Planning based on Landscapetope Classification. J. Korean Env. Res. Tech. 17(1): 65-79
  14. Lee, Kj, Park, CH, Song, BH and Kim. SB (2009) A Study on Selection of Representative Landscape for Farmers and Fishermen and Rural area. Korean J. Green Tourism Assoc. 12: 45-61.
  15. Lee, US, Park, YD, Kwon, TH (2017) An Analysis of Landscape Change Factors on Restoration Project of Ecological Ridgeline using Landscape Adjectives. J. Korean Env. Res. Tech. 20(1): 97-115
  16. Lim, JS (2013) Aesthetic Urban Design Elements in Influencing the Visual Preference of the Rural Town In South Korea, Hong-Ik University.
  17. Park, CR (2012) A Study on Image Formation for Urban and Rural arar's Residential Scenery Type, Chung-Nam National University.
  18. Ryu, JS (2012) A Study on the Extraction of Vocabulary and Image Analysis for Evaluation Urban and Rural Landscape, Chung-Nam National University.
  19. An, PG, An, NH, Shin, JH, and Shin, JH (2016) A survey of Expert's perceptions about landscape Element in organic farmland , Korean J. Org. Agric. 24(4), pp. 681-698. https://doi.org/10.11625/KJOA.2016.24.4.681
  20. Chae, HS, Son, HJ, Yu, JW, Kim, SB, Yang, HM(2018) A Study on the Search and Selection Criteria for Representative Domestic and Overseas Rural Landscapes. Korean J Society of community living science. 115.