DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Problems and Improvements in the Quality Control of the Air Monitoring Network

대기오염측정망 정도관리의 문제점과 개선방향

  • Kim, Duck-Sung (Korea Testing Laboratory(KTL)) ;
  • Park, Jeong-Ho (Department of Environmental Engineering, Gyeongnam National University of Science and Technology)
  • 김덕승 (한국산업기술시험원) ;
  • 박정호 (경남과학기술대학교 환경공학과)
  • Received : 2020.05.01
  • Accepted : 2020.07.14
  • Published : 2020.08.31

Abstract

This study presented problems and improvements in the quality control of an air monitoring network, using Gyeongnam as an example. 1) The effective utilization rate of the air monitoring was 95%, which showed good management, but the maximum of 2% was indicated by zero or detection limit among measurement data. 2) In the equivalence evaluation of PM2.5, the slope and intercept satisfy the evaluation criteria; however, 1% of the PM2.5/PM10 ratios were outliers. 3) All air monitoring stations meet the quality control standards; however, the management status is added to the quality inspection, management system is unified and the related budget is expanded, and systematic commission management is required.

Keywords

References

  1. Air Korea, 2020, http://www.airkorea.or.kr.
  2. Ghim, Y. S., Choi, Y., Park, J., Kim, P., Han, Y. K., 2017, Comparison of $PM_{2.5}$ Concentrations by Measurement Method, J. KOSAE, 33(5), 515-520. https://doi.org/10.5572/KOSAE.2017.33.5.515
  3. Gyeongnam, 2020, http://www.gyeongnam.go.kr/budget/finance/.
  4. Im, Y. S., Kim, S. P., Chol, Y. S., Ahn, M. J., Cho, S. J., Jung, K., 2015, Evaluation of seasonal measuring properties of different real-time $PM_{2.5}$ samplers, Seoul Research on Public Health and the Environment, 51, 195-203.
  5. Jeon, E. C., 1996, Evaluation of representativeness of air quality monitoring network in Seoul through actual measurement, J. Environ. Impact Asses, 5(1), 79-85.
  6. Jutze, G. A., Tabor, E. C., 1963, The continuous air monitoring program, Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association, 13(6), 278-280. https://doi.org/10.1080/00022470.1963.10468178
  7. Kim, D. S., 2013, Air pollution history, regulatory changes, and remedial measures of the current regulatory regimes in Korea, J. KOSAE, 29(4), 353-368. https://doi.org/10.5572/KOSAE.2013.29.4.353
  8. National Institute of Environmental Research (NIER), 2014, $PM_{2.5}$ automatic machine operating instructions, Seoul, 2-6.
  9. National Institute of Environmental Research (NIER), 2015, Quality control of air pollution monitoring system and establishment of data evaluation scheme (I), Seoul, 1-2.
  10. National Institute of Environmental Research (NIER), 2016, Atmospheric measurement network operation plan(2016-2020), Seoul, 1-7.
  11. National Institute of Environmental Research (NIER), 2019a, Air pollution monitoring network installation and operation guidelines, Seoul, 7-31.
  12. National Institute of Environmental Research (NIER), 2019b, Annual report of air quality, 2018, Seoul.
  13. National Institute of Environmental Research (NIER), 2020, Monthly report of air quality, December 2019, Seoul, 1-3.
  14. Park, J. H., Suh, J. M., 2018, Characteristics of $PM_{10}$, $PM_{2.5}$ and $PM_{2.5}/PM_{10}$ ratio in air monitoring stations in Gyeongnam, Journal of Environmental Science International, 27(10), 925-931. https://doi.org/10.5322/JESI.2018.27.10.925
  15. Park, M., Park, J. S., Jo, M., Lee, Y. H., Kin, H. J., Oh, J., 2017, Comparison of the real-time measurements for $PM_{2.5}$ and quality control method, J. KOSAE, 33(6), 616-623. https://doi.org/10.5572/KOSAE.2017.33.6.616
  16. Seoul, 2015, 2014 Health environment white paper, Seoul, 12-21.
  17. The Chosunilbo, 1963, http://srchdb1.chosun.com/pdf/.
  18. Woo, J. H., Kim, S. T., Kim, J. W., 1997, Evaluation and complement of the representativeness of air quality monitoring stations using passive air samples, J. KOSAE, 13(6), 415-426.