융합정보논문지 (Journal of Convergence for Information Technology)

중소기업융합학회 (Convergence Society for SMB)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

점진적 관찰감소 동작 관찰훈련이 만성기 뇌졸중 환자의 상지 기능과 일상생활 활동에 미치는 영향 : 예비 연구

The Effect of Gradually Observation-Reduction Action Observation Training on Upper Extremity Function and Activities of Daily Living in Patients with Chronic stroke: a Pilot Study

  • 한민 (청주대학교 작업치료학과 대학원) ;
  • 박주형 (청주대학교 작업치료학과)
  • Han, Min (Department of Occupational Therapy, Chungju University) ;
  • Park, Ju-Hyung (Department of Occupational Therapy, Chungju University)
  • 투고 : 2020.07.23
  • 심사 : 2020.08.20
  • 발행 : 2020.08.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 점진적 관찰감소 동작 관찰훈련이 만성기 뇌졸중 환자의 상지 기능과 일상생활 활동에 미치는 영향을 알아보고자 실시하였다. 만성기 뇌졸중 환자를 대상으로 점진적 관찰감소 동작 관찰훈련을 하는 실험군 4명과 기존의 동작 관찰 훈련을 받는 3명의 대조군으로 구분하여, 주 6회, 회당 30분씩, 총 2주간 실시하였다. 상지 기능 평가는 상자와 나무토막 검사(BBT)와 푸글 마이어 상지 운동기능평가 (FMA)를, 일상생활 활동 수행능력 평가는 한글판 수정바델지수(K-MBI)와 운동 활동 지표 (MAL)를 사용하였다. 그룹 별 중재 전·후 차이의 비교 결과와 두 그룹 간의 비교 결과는 BBT, FMA, K-MBI, MAL에서 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 보이진 않았으나, 실험군이 대조군에 비해 평균 점수 측면에서 더 큰 차이가 나타났다. 결과적으로 점진적 관찰감소 동작 관찰훈련은 기존의 동작관찰훈련 보다 더욱 긍정적인 영향을 끼칠 수 있음을 확인할 수 있었다.

This study was conducted to investigate the effect of gradually decreasing action observation training on the upper extremity function and Activities of daily living in chronic stroke patients. For patients with chronic stroke, the groups were divided into experimental group undergoing gradually decreasing action observation training(n=4), control group receiving existing action observation training(n=3) and the study was conducted 6 times a week, 30 minutes per session for a total of 2 weeks. The results of the comparison between the groups before and after intervention and the comparison between the two groups did not show statistically significant differences in BBT, FMA, K-MBI, and MAL, but the experimental group showed a greater difference in terms of average score than the control group. As a result, it was confirmed that gradually decreasing action observation training can have a more positive effect than the existing action observation training.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. G. Krug & G. McCormack. (2008). Occupational therapy:evidence based interventi ons for stroke. The Journal of the Missouri State Medical Association, 106(2), 145-149.
  2. M. M. Sohlberg & C. A. Mateer. (2017). Cognitive rehabilitation: An integrative neuropsychological approach. New York, Guilford Publications.
  3. A. Shumway-Cook & M. H. Woollacott. (2007). Motor control: Translating research into clinical practice. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
  4. S. M. Lai, S. Studenski, P. W. Duncan & S. Perera. (2002). Persisting consequences of stroke measured by the Stroke Impact Scale. Stroke, 33, 1840-1844. DOI : 10.1161/01.str.0000019289.15440.f2
  5. Y. R. Baek & S. K. Kim. (2010). The effect of modified forced-guided exercise therapy and task-oriented therapy consisting of two-handed activity on upper limb function and daily living activities of stroke patients. Korean Journal of Occupational Therapy, 18(2), 75-90.
  6. Y. S. Bang, H. Kim & M. K. Lee. (2009). Factors affecting the upper limb function in stroke patients. Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 9(7), 202-210. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2009.9.7.202
  7. M. H. Ko et al. (2009). Improving hand function by transcranial direct current stimulation in stroke patients. Journal of the Korean Society of Rehabilitation Medicine, 33(3), 259-264.
  8. S. J. Yoo, K. Ch. Hwang, H. J. Kim, & H. Ch. Kwon. (2011). Effect of Mirror-mediated Treatment on the Upper limb Function and Activities Daily Living in Hemiplegic Patients after Stroke. Journal of the Korean Society of Occupational Therapy, 19(2), 25-37.
  9. B. B. Johansson. (2011). Current trends in stroke rehabilitation. A review with focus on brain plasticity. Acta Neurologica Scandinavia, 123, 147-159. DOI : 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2010.01417
  10. V. Gallese, L. Fadiga, L. Fogassi et al. (1996). Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain, 119(2), 593-609. DOI : 10.1093/brain/119.2.593
  11. G. Rizzolatti, L. Fadiga, V. Gallese et al. (1996a). Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res, 3(2), 131-141. DOI : 10.1016/0926-6410(95)00038-0
  12. C. M. Hayes & C. L. Foster (2002). Motor learning by observation: evidence from a serial reaction time task. Expression Psychological, 55(2), 593-607. DOI : 10.1080/02724980143000389
  13. D. Ertelt, S. Small, A. Solodkin, C. Dettmers, A. McNamara, F. Binkofski & G. Buccino. (2007). Action observation has a positive impact on rehabilitation of motor deficits after stroke, NeuroImage, 36(2), 164-173. DOI : 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.03.043
  14. R. Gatti, A. Tettamanti, P. Gough et al. (2013). Action observation versus motor imagery in learning a complex motor task: a short review of literature and a kinematics study. Neurosci Lett. 540(37-42). DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.11.039
  15. C. Dettmers, V. Nedelko, T. Hassa et al. (2014). "Video therapy": Promoting hand function after stroke by action observation training-a pilot randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 2(189), 2. DOI:10.15268/ksim.2018.6.2.045
  16. H. J. Noh. (2015). Effects of Gradually Decreasing Action Observation Training on Stroke Patients Balance and Gait Ability. Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate School of Daejeon University, Unpublished Doctoral Thesis.
  17. M. S. Kang, Ch. Y. Lee, H. J. Kim & K. H. Hong. (2018). Effects of Gradually Decreasing Action Observation Training on Upper Extremity Function of Chronic Stroke Patients. Journal of the Korean Society of Occupational Therapy, 26(3). 57-68 https://doi.org/10.14519/jksot.2018.26.3.05
  18. J. E. Harris, J. J. Eng, W. C. Miller & A. S. Dawson. (2009). A self-administerd graded repetitive arm supplementary program improves arm function during impatient stroke rehabilitation : A multi-site randonmized controlled trial, Stroke, 40(6), 2123-2128. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.544585
  19. C. A. Trombly & M. V. Radomski. (2008). Occupational therapy for Physical dysfunction. 6th ed. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
  20. T. Platz, C. Pinkowski, F. V. Wijck, I. H. Kim, P. D. Bella & G. Johnson. (2005). Reliability and validity of arm function assessment with standardized guidelines for the Fugl-Meyer Test, Action Research Arm Test and Box and Block Test: a multicentre study. 19(4), 404-411. DOI : 10.1191/0269215505cr832oa
  21. H. S. Kim, J. G. Her, J. Y. Ko, D. S. Park, J. H. Woo, Y. Y. You & Y. G. Choi. (2012). Reliability, concurrent validity, and responsiveness of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment(FMA) for hemiplegic patients. Journal of Physical Therapy Science, 24(9), 893-899. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.24.893
  22. H. Y. Jung, B. K. Park, H. S. Shin, Y. K. Kang, S. B. Pyun, N. J. Paik & T. R. Han. (2007). Development of the Korean version of Modified Barthel Index(K-MBI): Multi-center study for subjects with stroke. Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, 31(3), 283-297.
  23. G. Uswatte, E. Taub, D. Morris, M. Vignolo & K. McCulloch. (2005). Reliability and validity of the upper-extremity Moto Activity Log-14 for measuring real-world arm use. Stroke, 36(11), 2493-2496. DOI : 10.1161/01.STR.0000185928.90848.2e
  24. A. M. Hartman, N. Soroker, H. Ring, N. Avni & N. Katz. (2007). Activities participation and satisfaction one-year post stroke. Disability & Rehabilitation, 29(7), 559-566. DOI : 10.1080/09638280600924996
  25. P. Celnik, K. Stefan & F. Hummel, J. Duque, J. Classen & L. G Cohen. (2006). Encoding a motor memory in the older adult by action observation. Neuroimage, 29(2), 677-684. DOI : 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.07.039
  26. Mulder. (2007). Motor imagery and action observation: Cognitive tools for rehabilitation. Journal of Neural Transmission, 114(10), 1265-1278. DOI: 10.1007/s00702-007-0763-z
  27. B. Bianca, B. Elena, P. Valerie, I. Oriana, S. Elisa, P. Silvia, B. Eleonora, F. Hilde, K. Katrijn, Giovanni, Cioni & Giuseppina Sgandurra. (2019). Action observation training for rehabilitation in brain injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Buchignani et al. BMC Neurology. 19(1), 344. DOI : 10.1186/s12883-019-1533-x
  28. E. L. Deci , R. J. Vallerand , L. G. Pelletier & R. M. Ryan. (2011). Motivation and Education: The Self-Determination Perspective. Journal Educational Psychologist, 26(3-4), 325-346.
  29. J. Schüler, N. Baumann, A. Chasiotis, M. Bender & I. Baum. (2018). Implicit motives and basic psychological needs, Special Issue:Selfdetermination theory as a unifying theory within personality psychology, 87(1), 37-55. DOI: 10.1111/jopy.12431
  30. R. K. Spaeth-Arnold. (1981). Developing sport skills: A dynamic interplay of task, learner, and teacher. Motor Skills, 2, 3-81.
  31. P. G. Post, Ch. A. Aiken, D. D. Laughlin & J. T. Fairbrother. (2016). Self-control over combined video feedback and modeling facilitates motor learning. Human Movement Science, 47, 49-59. DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2016.01.014
  32. A. M. Gentile. (1987). Skill acquisition: Action, movement, and neuromotor processes, J. H. In, R. B. Carr, J. Shepherd, A. M. Gordon, Gentile & J. H. Held (Eds.), Movement Science Foundations for Physical Therapy in Rehabilitation, (93-154), Rockville, MD: Aspen. DOI: 10.2466/pms.1997.84.1.179