DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Scalp reconstruction: A 10-year experience

  • Jang, Hyeon Uk (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Inje University Sanggye Paik Hospital, Inje University School of Medicine) ;
  • Choi, Young Woong (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Inje University Sanggye Paik Hospital, Inje University School of Medicine)
  • Received : 2020.06.19
  • Accepted : 2020.08.14
  • Published : 2020.08.20

Abstract

Background: The scalp is an important functional and aesthetic structure that protects the cranial bone. Due to its inelastic characteristics, soft-tissue defects of the scalp make reconstruction surgery difficult. This study aims to provide an improved scalp reconstruction decision making algorithm for surgeons. Methods: This study examined patients who underwent scalp reconstruction within the last 10 years. The study evaluated several factors that surgeons use to select a given reconstruction method such as etiology, defect location, size, depth, and complications. An algorithmic approach was then suggested based on an analysis of these factors. Results: Ninety-four patients were selected in total and 98 cases, including revision surgery, were performed for scalp reconstruction. Scalp reconstruction was performed by primary closure (36.73%), skin graft (27.55%), local flap (17.34%), pedicled regional flap (15.30%), and free flap (3.06%). The ratio of primary closure to more complex procedure on loose scalps (51.11%) was significantly higher than on tight scalps (24.52%) (p=0.011). The choice of scalp reconstruction method was affected significantly by the defect size (R=0.479, p<0.001) and depth (p<0.001). There were five major complications which were three cases of flap necrosis and two cases of skin necrosis. Hematoma was the most common of the 29 minor complications reported, followed by skin necrosis. Conclusion: There are multiple factors affecting the choice of scalp reconstruction method. We suggest an algorithm based on 10 years of experience that will help surgeons establish successful surgical management for their patients.

Keywords

References

  1. Desai SC, Sand JP, Sharon JD, Branham G, Nussenbaum B. Scalp reconstruction: an algorithmic approach and systematic review. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2015;17:56-66. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2014.889
  2. Leedy JE, Janis JE, Rohrich RJ. Reconstruction of acquired scalp defects: an algorithmic approach. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005;116:54e-72e. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000179188.25019.6c
  3. Newman MI, Hanasono MM, Disa JJ, Cordeiro PG, Mehrara BJ. Scalp reconstruction: a 15-year experience. Ann Plast Surg 2004;52:501-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000123346.58418.e6
  4. Steiner D, Hubertus A, Arkudas A, Taeger CD, Ludolph I, Boos AM, et al. Scalp reconstruction: a 10-year retrospective study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2017;45:319-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2016.11.023
  5. Temple CL, Ross DC. Scalp and forehead reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 2005;32:377-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2005.02.002
  6. Brenner MJ. Scalp reconstruction. In: Branham GH, editor. Facial soft tissue reconstruction. Shelton: People's Medical Publishing House; 2011. p. 117.
  7. Raposio E, Nordstrom RE, Santi PL. Undermining of the scalp: quantitative effects. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;101:1218-22. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199804050-00007
  8. Worlicek C, Kaufmann R. Divided full-thickness skin graft for closure of circular and oval scalp defects. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2012;10:274-6.
  9. Khan MA, Ali SN, Farid M, Pancholi M, Rayatt S, Yap LH. Use of dermal regeneration template (Integra) for reconstruction of full-thickness complex oncologic scalp defects. J Craniofac Surg 2010;21:905-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181d8418e
  10. Mehrara BJ, Disa JJ, Pusic A. Scalp reconstruction. J Surg Oncol 2006;94:504-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.20487
  11. Kim JC, Hadlock T, Varvares MA, Cheney ML. Hair-bearing temporoparietal fascial flap reconstruction of upper lip and scalp defects. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2001;3:170-7. https://doi.org/10.1001/archfaci.3.3.170
  12. Hussussian CJ, Reece GP. Microsurgical scalp reconstruction in the patient with cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;109:1828-34. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200205000-00008
  13. Serletti JM, Higgins JP, Moran S, Orlando GS. Factors affecting outcome in free-tissue transfer in the elderly. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000;106:66-70. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200007000-00012

Cited by

  1. A recurrent case of extraocular sebaceous carcinoma with distant organ metastasis vol.22, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2020.00675