Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences

Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (아세아태평양축산학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of stress during slaughter on carcass characteristics and meat quality in tropical beef cattle

  • Carrasco-Garcia, Apolo A. (Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Zootecnics, Veracruzana University) ;
  • Pardio-Sedas, Violeta T. (Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Zootecnics, Veracruzana University) ;
  • Leon-Banda, Gloria G. (Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Zootecnics, Veracruzana University) ;
  • Ahuja-Aguirre, Concepcion (Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Zootecnics, Veracruzana University) ;
  • Paredes-Ramos, Pedro (Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Zootecnics, Veracruzana University) ;
  • Hernandez-Cruz, Bertha C. (Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Zootecnics, Veracruzana University) ;
  • Murillo, Vicente Vega (Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Zootecnics, Veracruzana University)
  • Received : 2019.10.15
  • Accepted : 2020.01.06
  • Published : 2020.10.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to determine the effects of stress during slaughter of beef cattle on physiological parameters, carcass, and meat quality at a Federal Inspection Type slaughterhouse located in the southeast of Mexico. Methods: A total of 448 carcasses of male Zebu×European steers with an average age of 36 months were included. Carcass assessment of presence of bruises and bruise characteristics was carried out on each half-carcass. Blood variable indicators of stress (packed cell volume, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, glucose, cortisol concentration) and meat quality parameters (pH, color, shear force, drip loss) were evaluated. Results: Of the 448 carcasses evaluated, 81% of the carcasses showed at least one bruise; one bruise was detected in 36.6% and two bruises in 27.0% of animals. Of the 775 bruises found, 69.2% of the bruises were grade 1 in region 3. Of the 448 carcasses studied, 69.6% showed hyperglycemia (6.91 mmol/L); 44.3% and 22.7% showed high (74.7 ng/mL) and extremely high (108.8 ng/mL) cortisol levels, respectively, indicative of inadequate handling of animals during preslaughter and slaughter. Of the carcasses evaluated, 90.4% had a pH ≥5.8 with an average of pH 6.3. In both pH groups, meat samples showed L⋆ values >37.0 (81.6%) and a shear force >54.3 N; meat pH≥5.8 group showed a drip loss of 2.5%. These findings were indicative of dark, firm, and dry (DFD) meat. According to principal component analysis, grades 1 and 2 bruises in region 3 and grade 1 bruises in region 5 were highly associated with cortisol, drip loss, and color parameters b⋆ and h⋆ and were negatively associated with L⋆, a⋆, and C⋆. Conclusion: The bruises probably caused by stress-inducing situations triggered DFD meat. Appropriate changes in handling routines in operating conditions should be made to minimize stress to animals during the slaughter process to improve animal welfare and meat quality.

Keywords

References

  1. Miranda-de la Lama GC, Villarroel M, Maria GA. Livestock transport from the perspective of the pre-slaughter logistic chain: a review. Meat Sci 2014;98:9-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.04.005
  2. Ferguson DM, Warner RD. Have we underestimated the impact of pre-slaughter stress on meat quality in ruminants? Meat Sci 2008;80:12-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.05.004
  3. Odore R, D'Angelo A, Badino P, Bellino C, Pagliasso S, Re G. Road transportation affects blood hormone levels and lymphocyte glucocorticoid and $\beta$-adrenergic receptor concentrations in calves. Vet J 2004;168:297-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2003.09.008
  4. Lomiwes D, Farouk MM, Wu G, Young OA. The development of meat tenderness is likely to be compartmentalised by ultimate pH. Meat Sci 2014;96:646-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.08.022
  5. Amtmann V, Gallo C, van Schaik G, Takich N. Relationships between ante-mortem handling, blood based stress indicators and carcass pH in steers. Arch Med Vet 2006;38:259-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0301-732X2006000300010
  6. Minka NS, Ayo JO. Physiological responses of food animals to road transportation stress. Afr J Biotechnol 2010;9:6601-6613.
  7. Gregory NG. Animal welfare at markets and during transport and slaughter. Meat Sci 2008;80:2-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.05.019
  8. Perez Linares C, Sanchez Lopez E, Rios Rincon F, Olivas Valdes J, Fegueroa Saavedra F, Barreras Serrano A. Pre and post slaughter cattle and carcass management factors associated to presence of DFD beef in the hot season. Rev Mex Cienc Pecu 2013;4:149-60.
  9. Apple JK, Kegley EB, Galloway DL, Wistuba TJ, Rakes LK. Duration of restraint and isolation stress as a model to study the dark-cutting condition in cattle. J Anim Sci 2005;83:1202-14. https://doi.org/10.2527/2005.8351202x
  10. Loredo-Osti J, Sanchez Lopez E, Barreras Serrano A, et al. An evaluation of environmental, intrinsic and pre-and post-slaughter risk factors associated to dark-cutting beef in a Federal Inspected Type slaughter plant. Meat Sci. 2019;150:85-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.12.007
  11. Servicio de Informacion Agroalimentaria y Pesquera [SIAP]. 2019. Livestock production. [Internet]. [cited 2019 January 31]. Available from: https://www.gob.mx/siap/acciones-y-programas/produccion-pecuaria
  12. Secretaria de Gobernacion [SEGOB]. 2019. Official Journal of the Federation. Laws and regulations. [Internet]. SEGOB; 2019 [cited 2019 January 31]. Available from: http://dof.gob.mx
  13. Rebagliati J, Ballerio M, Acerbi R, et al. Evaluation of cattle management practices that cause economical losses in beef processing plants in Argentina. Rev Vet 2008;9:1695-7504. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=63617111002
  14. Ruder HJ, Guy RL, Lipsett MB. A radioimmunoassay for cortisol in plasma and urine. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1972; 35:219-24. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem-35-2-219
  15. Secretaria de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural [SADER]. Manual of analytical quality in meat samples. Mexico City, Mexico. 2011. Technical booklet no. 11.
  16. International Commission on Illumination [C.I.E.]. Recommendations on uniform color spaces, color-difference equations, psychometric color terms. Paris, France: Bureau of C.I.E.; 1978. Supplement no. 2 to C.I.E. publication no. 15(E-1.31) 1971/(TC-1.3) 1978.
  17. Bellew JB, Brook JC, Mckenna DR, Savell JW. Warner-Bratzler shear evaluation of 40 bovine muscles. Meat Sci 2003;64:507-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(02)00242-5
  18. Lesiak MT, Olson DG, Lesiak CA, Ahn DU. Effects of post-mortem time before chilling and chilling temperatures on water-holding capacity and texture of turkey breast muscle. Poult Sci 1996;76:552-6. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/76.3.552
  19. Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD. SAS system for mixed models. Cary, NC, USA: SAS Inst., Inc.; 1996.
  20. Miranda-de la Lama GC, Leyva I, Barreras-Serrano A, et al. Assessment of cattle welfare at a commercial slaughter plant in the northwest of Mexico. Trop Anim Health Prod 2012;44:497-504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-011-9925-y
  21. Gonzalez U. Study of some pre slaughter factors that affect cattle welfare at a TIF slaughterhouse in the central zone of Veracruz state [bachelor's thesis]. Veracruz, Mexico: Veracruzana University; 2010.
  22. Knowles T, Warriss P. Stress physiology of animals during transport. In: Grandin T, editor. Livestock handling and transport. Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing; 2006. p. 399-420.
  23. Gupta S, Earley B, Crowe MA. Effect of 12-hour road transportation on physiological, immunological and haematological parameters in bulls housed at different space allowances. Vet J 2007;173:605-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2006.03.002
  24. Tadich N, Gallo C, Bustamante H, Schwerter M, van Schaik G. Effects of transport and lairage time on some blood constituents of Friesian-cross steers in Chile. Livest Prod Sci 2005; 93:223-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livprodsci.2004.10.004
  25. Cunningham JG. Veterinary physiology. Toluca, Mexico: Interamericana Mc. Graw Hill; 1994.
  26. Poleti M, Moncaua C, Silva-Vignatoa B, et al. Label-free quantitative proteomic analysis reveals muscle contraction and metabolism proteins linked to ultimate pH in bovine skeletal muscle. Meat Sci 2018;145:209-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.06.041
  27. Abril M, Campo MM, Onenc A, Sanudo C, Alberti P, Negueruela AI. Beef colour evolution as a function of ultimate pH. Meat Sci 2001;58:69-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(00)00133-9
  28. Tang J, Faustman C, Hoagland TA, Mancini RA, Seyfert M, Hunt MC. Postmortem oxygen consumption by mitochondria and its effects on myoglobin form and stability. J Agric Food Chem 2005;53:1223-30. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf048646o
  29. Muchenje V, Dzama K, Chimonyo M, Strydom PE, Raats JG. Relationship between pre-slaughter stress responsiveness and beef quality in three cattle breeds. Meat Sci 2009;81:653-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.11.004
  30. Holman BWB, Mao Y, Coombs CEO, van de Ven RJ, Hopkins DL. Relationship between colorimetric (instrumental) evaluation and consumer-defined beef colour acceptability. Meat Sci 2016;121:104-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.05.002
  31. Ruiz de Huidobro F, Miguel E, Blazquez B, Onega E. A comparison between two methods (Warner-Bratzler and texture profile analysis) for testing either raw meat or cooked meat. Meat Sci 2005;69:527-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.09.008
  32. Holdstock J, Aalhus JL, Uttaro BA, Lopez-Campos O, Larsen IL, Bruce HL. The impact of ultimate pH on muscle characteristics and sensory attributes of the longissimus thoracis within the dark cutting (Canada B4) beef carcass grade. Meat Sci 2014;98:842-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.07.029
  33. Purchas RW. An assessment of the role of pH differences in determining the relative tenderness of meat from bulls and steers. Meat Sci 1990;27:129-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-1740(90)90061-A
  34. King DA, Schuehle CE, Randel RD, et al. Influence of animal temperament and stress responsiveness on the carcass quality and beef tenderness of feedlot cattle. Meat Sci 2006;74:546-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.05.004
  35. Shackelford SD, Wheeler TL, Koohmaraie M. Tenderness classification of beef: I. Evaluation of beef Longissimus shear force at 1 o 2 days postmortem as a predictor of aged beef tenderness. J Anim Sci 1997;75:2417-22. https://doi.org/10.2527/1997.7592417x
  36. Hughes JM, Oiseth SK, Purslow PP, Warner RD. A structural approach to understanding the interactions between colour, water-holding capacity and tenderness. Meat Sci 2014;98:520-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.05.022
  37. Hargreaves A, Barrales L, Pena I, Larrain R, Zamorano L. Factors influencing ultimate pH and dark cutting beef incidence in bovine carcasses. Cienc Investig Agrar 2004;31:155-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.7764/rcia.v31i3.291
  38. Office International des Epizooties. Bienestar Animal [Internet]. OIE; 2019 [cited 2019 January 31]. Available from: http://www.oie.int/es/bienestar-animal/normas-de-la-oie-y-comercio-internacional/

Cited by

  1. Tropical Beef: Is There an Axiomatic Basis to Define the Concept? vol.10, pp.5, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10051025
  2. The effects of accustoming to handling during the finishing period and weaning status on stress responses to transport, and carcass and meat quality in Kivircik lambs vol.206, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2021.106587