Asia Marketing Journal

Korean Marketing Association (한국마케팅학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Role of Imagery vs. Analytical Advertisement on New Products Evaluation

  • Lee, Juyon (Graduate School of Business Administration, Seoul National University) ;
  • Chu, Wujin (College of Business Administration, Seoul National University)
  • Received : 2020.06.15
  • Accepted : 2020.07.24
  • Published : 2020.07.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Combining prior theories on innovation newness with information processing style (imagery vs. analytical), this study presents a theoretical framework; develops hypotheses; and makes predictions on how analytical versus imagery ads influence consumers differently depending on the newness level of products. The study shows that consumers are more likely to evaluate RNPs (radically-innovative new products) positively when they are advertised with imagery cues. Compared with analytical advertisements, imagery advertisements increased advertising effectiveness, product evaluation, and purchase intention of RNPs. These effects were demonstrated by using stimuli from two product categories consisting of washing machines and cars. In particular, in advertisement for RNPs, verbal description that induced imagery processing, such as "picture yourself using this product," was more effective in generating favorable responses, compared to verbal description that induced analytical processing, such as explanation of product attributes. This difference was present for RNPs, but not for INPs (incrementally-innovative new products). INPs are continuous innovations that are easier to understand, thus imagery ads do not provide additional advantage for consumers in understanding the innovation, compared to analytical ads. In RNPs, imagery ads can highlight new benefits that may have been neglected or undervalued by consumers, leading to greater message persuasiveness. Implications for marketing of RNPs are discussed.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This paper has received financial support from Marketing Research Center, Seoul National University.

References

  1. Alexander, David L., John G. Lynch Jr. and Qing Wang (2008), "As Time Goes By: Do Cold Feet Follow Warm Intentions for Really New versus Incrementally New Products?" Journal of Marketing Research, 45(3), 307-319. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.45.3.307
  2. Bettman, James, Mary F. Luce, and John Payne (1998), "Constructive Consumer Choice Processes," Journal of Consumer Research, 25(3), 187-217. https://doi.org/10.1086/209535
  3. Bolls, Paul D. and Darrel D. Muehling (2007), "The Effects of Dual Task Processing on Consumers' Responses to High- and Low-Imagery Radio Advertisements," Journal of Advertising, 36(4), 35-47. https://doi.org/10.2753/joa0091-3367360403
  4. Bone, P. Fitzgerald and Pam S. Ellen (1992), "The Generation and Consequences of Communication-Evoked Imagery," Journal of Consumer Research, 19(1), 93-104. https://doi.org/10.1086/209289
  5. Burke, Marian Chapman and Julie A. Edell (1989), "The Impact of Feelings on Ad-Based Affect and Cognition," Journal of Marketing Research, 26(February), 69-83. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378902600106
  6. Castano, Raquel, Mita Sujan, Manish Kacker, and Harish Sujan (2008), "Managing Consumer Uncertainty in the Adoption of New Products: Temporal Distance and Mental Simulation," Journal of Marketing Research, 45(3), 320-336. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.45.3.320
  7. Childers, Terry L., Michael J. Houston, and Sujan E. Heckler (1985), "Measurement of Individual Differences in Visual versus Verbal Information Processing," Journal of Consumer Research, 12(2), 125-134. https://doi.org/10.1086/208501
  8. Cho, Hye Jeung (2013), "The Role of Processing Fluency in Product Innovativeness Judgment," Asia Marketing Journal, 15(3), 31-52.
  9. Dahl, Darren W., Amitava Chattopadhyay, and Gerald J. Gorn (1999), "The Use of Visual Mental Imagery in New Product Design," Journal of Marketing Research, 36(1), 18-28. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379903600102
  10. Dahl, Darren W. and Steve Hoeffler (2004), "Visualizing the Self: Exploring the Potential Benefits and Drawbacks for New Product Evaluation," Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21, 259-267. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0737-6782.2004.00077.x
  11. Edell, Julie A. and Richard Staelin (1983), "The Information Processing of Pictures in Print Advertisements," Journal of Consumer Research, 10(June), 45-61. https://doi.org/10.1086/208944
  12. Escalas, J. Edson (2004), "Imagine Yourself in the Product: Mental Simulation, Narrative Transportation, and Persuasion," Journal of Advertising, 33(2), 37-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2004.10639163
  13. Escalas, J. Edson and Mary F. Luce (2004), "Understanding the Effects of Process-Focused Versus Outcome-Focused Thought in Response to Advertising," Journal of Consumer Research, 31(2), 274-285. https://doi.org/10.1086/422107
  14. Feiereisen, S., V. Wong, and A. J. Broderick (2008), "Analogies and Mental simulations in Learning for Really New Products: The Role of Visual Attention," Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25, 593-607. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2008.00324.x
  15. Fischoff, Baruch (1991), "Value Elicitation: Is there Anything in There?" American Psychologist, 46(8), 835-846. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.46.8.835
  16. Gasper, Karen (2004), "Do You See What I see? Affect and Visual Information Processing," Cognitive and Emotion, 18 (3), 405-421. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930341000068
  17. Garcia, Rosanna and Roger Calatone (2002), "A Critical Look at Technological Innovation Typology and Innovativeness Terminology: A Literature Review," Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19(2), 110-132. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.1920110
  18. Gregan-Paxton, Jennifer and Page Moreau (2003), "How Do Consumers Transfer Existing Knowledge? A comparison of Analogy and Categorization Effects," Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(4), 422-430. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1304_09
  19. Hauser, John, Gerard J. Tellis, and Abbie Griffin (2006), "Research on Innovation: A Reivew and Agenda for Marketing," Marketing Science, 25(6), 687-717. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1050.0144
  20. Hoeffler, Steve (2003), "Measuring Preferences for Really New Products," Journal of Marketing Research, 40(4), 406-420. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.40.4.406.19394
  21. Jhang, Ji Hoon, Susan Jung Grant, and Margaret C. Campbell (2012), "Get it? Got it. Good! Enhancing New Product Acceptance by Facilitating Resolution of Extreme Incongruity," Journal of Marketing Research, 49(2), 247-259. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.10.0428
  22. Kalro, Arti D., Bharadawaj Sivakumaran, and Rahul R. Marathe (2013), "Direct or Indirect Comparative Ads: The Moderating Role of Information Processing Modes," Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 12, 133-147. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1421
  23. Keller, Punam A., and Lauren G. Block (1997), "Vividness Effects: A Resource Matching Perspective," Journal of Consumer Research, 24(3), 295-304. https://doi.org/10.1086/209511
  24. Keller, Punam A. and Ann L. McGill (1994), "Differences in the Relative Influence of Product Attributes under Alternative Processing Conditions: Attribute Importance versus Attribute Ease of Imaginability," Journal of Consumer Psychology, 3(1), 29-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1057-7408(08)80027-7
  25. Kisielius, Jolita, and Brian Sternthal (1986), "Examining the Vividness Controversy: An Availability-Valence Interpretation," Journal of Consumer Research, 12(4), 418-431. https://doi.org/10.1086/208527
  26. Labroo, Aparna A., and Angela Y. Lee (2006), "Between Two Brands: A Goal Fluency Account of Brand Evaluation," Journal of Marketing Research, 43(3), 374-385. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.43.3.374
  27. Lee, Angela Y. and Aparna A. Labroo (2004), "The Effect of Conceptual and Perceptual Fluency on Brand Evaluation," Journal of Marketing Research, 41(2), 151-165. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.41.2.151.28665
  28. Lee, Juyon and Wujin Chu (2020), "The Effects of Innovation Newness on Consumers' Purchase Intention: Focusing on the Mediating Role of Familiarity and Perceived Risk and the Moderating Role of Attributes vs. Benefits Appeal," Korea Journal of Marketing, 35(1), 97-117. https://doi.org/10.15830/kjm.2020.35.1.97
  29. Lehman, Don (1997), "A Different Game: Setting the Stage," Paper presented at MSI Conference. A Different Game: Really New Products, Evolving Markets, and Retrospective Organizations, Boston, MA, March 16-18.
  30. Ma, Zhenfeng, Tripat Gill, and Ying Jiang (2015), "Core versus Peripheral Innovations: The Effect of Innovation Locus on Consumer Adoption of New Products," Journal of Marketing Research, 52(3), 309-324. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.13.0337
  31. Mani, Gayathri, and Deborah J. MacInnis (2001), "Imagery Instructions, Imagery Processes and Visual Persuasion," in Advertising and Consumer Psychology, R. Batra and O. Scott, eds., Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
  32. MacInnis, Deborah J. and Linda L. Price (1987), "The Role of Imagery in Information Processing: Review and Extensions," Journal of Consumer Research, 13(4), 473-491. https://doi.org/10.1086/209082
  33. MacKenzie, Scott and Richard Lutz (1987), "An Empirical Examination of the Structural Antecedents of Attitude toward the Ad in an Advertising Pretesting Context," Journal of Marketing, 53(April), 48-65. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298905300204
  34. Mukherjee, Ashesh and Wayne D. Hoyer (2001), "The Effect of Novel Attributes on Product Evaluation," Journal of Consumer Research, 28(3), 462-472. https://doi.org/10.1086/323733
  35. Noseworthy, Theodore J., June Cotte, and Seung Hwan (Mark) Lee (2011), "The Effects of Ad Context and Gender on the Identification of Visually Incongruent Products," Journal of Consumer Research, 38(2), 358-375. https://doi.org/10.1086/658472
  36. Noseworthy, Theodore J, Kyle B Murray, and Fabrizio Di Muro (2018), "When Two Wrongs Make a Right: Using Conjunctive Enablers to Enhance Evaluations for Extremely Incongruent New Products," Journal of Consumer Research, 44(6), 1319-1396.
  37. Oliver, Richard L., Thomas S. Robertson and Deborah J. Mitchell (1993), "Imaging and Analyzing in Response to New Product Advertising," Journal of Advertising, 22 (4), 35-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1993.10673417
  38. Ostlund, Lymman E. (1974), "Perceived Innovation Attributes as Predictors of Innovativeness," Journal of Consumer Research, 1(2), 23-29. https://doi.org/10.1086/208587
  39. Payne, John W. James R. Bettman, and Eric J. Johnson (1992), "Behavioral Decision Research: A Constructive Processing Approach," Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 87-131. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.43.020192.000511
  40. Petrova, Petia K. and Robert B. Cialdini (2005), "Fluency of Consumption Imagery and the Backfire Effects of Imagery Appeals," Journal of Consumer Research, 32(3), 442-452. https://doi.org/10.1086/497556
  41. Phillips, Diane (1996), "Anticipating the Future: The Role of Consumption Visions in Consumer Behavior. In: Advances in Consumer Research. M. Brucks and D. J. MacInnis (eds.), Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 70-75.
  42. Rogers, Everett (2003), Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Simon and Schuster.
  43. Roy, Rajat and Ian Phau (2014), "Examining Regulatory Focus in the Information Processing of Imagery and Analytical Advertisements," Journal of Advertising, 43(4), 371-381. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2014.888323
  44. Shiv, Baba and Joel Huber (2000), "The Impact of Anticipating Satisfaction on Consumer Choice," Journal of Consumer Research, 27 (2), 202-216. https://doi.org/10.1086/314320
  45. Slovic, Paul (1995), "The Construction of Preference," American Psychologist, 50(5), 364-371. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.50.5.364
  46. Smith, Pamela K., and Yaacov Trope (2006), "You Focus on the Forest When You Are in Charge of Trees: Power Priming and Abstract Information Processing," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90 (4), 578-596. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.578
  47. Smith, Terrence R., Andrew A. Mitchell, and Robert Meyer (1982), "A Computational Process Model of Evaluation Based on Cognitive Structuring of Episodic Knowledge," in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 9, Andrew A. Mitchell, ed., Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 136-143.
  48. Sujan, Mita (1985), "Consumer Knowledge: Effects of Evaluation Strategies Mediating Consumer Judgments," Journal of Consumer Research, 12(1), 31-45. https://doi.org/10.1086/209033
  49. Thompson, Debora Viana and Rebecca W. Hamilton (2006), "The Effects of Information Processing Mode on Consumers' Responses to Comparative Advertising," Journal of Consumer Research, 32(4), 530-540. https://doi.org/10.1086/500483
  50. Tybout, Alice M., Brian Sternthal, Prashant Malaviya, Geogios A. Bakamitsos, and Sebum Park (2005), "Information Accessibility as a Moderator of Judgments: The Role of Content vs. Retrieval Ease," Journal of Consumer Research, 32(1), 76-85. https://doi.org/10.1086/426617
  51. Unnava, H. Rao and Robert E. Burnkrant (1991), "An Imagery-Processing View of the Role of Pictures in Print Advertisements," Journal of Marketing Research, 28(2), 226-231. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379102800210
  52. Walker, Beth and Jerry C. Olson (1997), "The Activated Self in Consumer Behavior: A Cognitive Structure Perspective," Research in Consumer Behavior, 8(2), 135-171.
  53. Wyer, Robert S., Iris W. Hung, and Yuwei Jiang (2008), "Visual and Verbal Processing Strategies in Comprehension and Judgment," Journal of Consumer Psychology, 18(4), 244-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2008.09.002
  54. Yoo, Jun Sang and Hwan Woong Song (2010), "Effect of Mental Simulation on Consumer Response to Innovative New Product," Korea Journal of Marketing, 25 (1), 25-47.
  55. Zhao, Min, Darren W. Dahl, and Steve Hoeffler (2014), "Optimal Visualization Aids and Temporal Framing for New Products," Journal of Consumer Research, 41(4), 1137-1151. https://doi.org/10.1086/678485
  56. Zhao, Min, Steve Hoeffler, and Darren W. Dahl (2009), "The Role of Imagination-Focused Visualization on New Product Evaluation," Journal of Marketing Research, 46(1), 46-55. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.46.1.46
  57. Zhao, Min, Steve Hoeffler, and Darren W. Dahl (2012), "Imagination Difficulty and New Product Evaluation," Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(S1), 76-90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2012.00951.x