DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Utilization and Characteristics of Vietnam's Arbitration System in the FTA Era

FTA시대 베트남 중재제도의 특징과 활용방안에 관한 연구 - VIAC 중재규칙과 KCAB 국제중재규칙 비교를 중심으로 -

  • Kim, Sung-Ryong (College of Economics & Business Administration, Kyungpook National University)
  • Received : 2020.05.09
  • Accepted : 2020.05.31
  • Published : 2020.06.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the characteristics of Vietnam's arbitration system and to present measures that companies can utilize in practice. This research considers KCAB International Arbitration Rules, focusing on amendments to the Decree on Vietnam Commercial Arbitration Act and amendments to the VIAC Arbitration Rules. To sum up some features, the decree on the Commercial Arbitration Act simplified the registration procedures for arbitration centers and their branches and made the publication of court decisions and the recognition of the approval and execution of foreign arbitration courts, thereby enhancing transparency. First of all, the decree on the Commercial Arbitration Act simplified registration procedures for arbitration centers and their branches. In addition, the court strengthened transparency by officially announcing court judgments, recognition, and decisions. Next, there are some points to note in the arbitration rules of the VIAC. First of all, the rules of expedited procedure lack clarity. Next, parties should make a separate document for counterclaim and submit it with a statement of defense. In addition, the arbitral language may choose multiple languages by the Arbitral Tribunal unless the parties agree. Therefore, companies need to take a closer look at their understanding of the international arbitration system, which is mainly used in international disputes, and the characteristics of the Vietnamese arbitration system.

Keywords

References

  1. 김상찬, "ADR제도의 비교법적 연구-아시아의 주요 국가를 중심으로", 중재연구, 제19권 제3호, 한국중재학회, 2009.
  2. 김선정, "2011년 베트남 상사중재법에 관한 소고", 중재연구, 제23권 제4호, 한국중재학회, 2013.
  3. 김성룡, "조선 해운산업의 효과적 분쟁해결을 위한 긴급중재인제도 활용방안에 관한 연구", 중재연구, 제27권 제1호, 한국중재학회, 2017.
  4. 김영주, "ASEAN 국가들의 외국중재판정에 관한 승인 및 집행 -말레이시아, 싱가포르, 인도네시아의 법제 및 판례를 중심으로", 중재연구 제25권 제2호, 한국중재학회, 2015. https://doi.org/10.16998/JAS.2015.25.2.19
  5. 박진아, "베트남 중재법제와 유의점", 법학연구, 제47권, 전북대학교 법학연구소, 2016.
  6. 손경한, "베트남에서의 중재판정의 취소", 한국무역학회 학술대회, 한국무역학회, 2015.
  7. 오현석, "2001년 베트남 상사중재법제와 중재절차", 국제상학, 제29권 제4호, 한국국제상학회, 2014.
  8. 조인호, "중재인의 공정성과 독립성 -2014국제중재에서의 이해관계 상충에 관한 국제변호사협회 가이드라인과 사례연구-", 무역상무연구 제78권, 한국무역상무학회, 2018.
  9. Corinne Nguyen & Anh Duong Vu, "Arbitration in Vietnam", Journal of International Arbitration Vol.31 No 5, 2014.
  10. Harald Sippel, "Arbitrating Under the New Arbitration Rules of the Vietnam International Arbitration Centre - Tips for Korean Companies", Korean Arbitration Review, Vol. 8, 2018.
  11. Nguyen Manh Dzung, Dang Vu Minh Ha, "VIETNAM", Arbitration Guide IBA Arbitration Committee, 2018.
  12. Nguyen Ngoc Minh, Mguyen Thi Trang and Nguyen Thi Mai Anh, "Vietnam", Asia-Pacific Arbitration Review, Vol. 10, 2020.
  13. 뉴욕협약
  14. 대한상사중재원 국제중재규칙
  15. 베트남국제중재센터 중재규칙
  16. 대한상사중재원(http://www.kcab.or.kr)
  17. 베트남국제중재센터(http://eng.viac.vn/)