Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science

영남대 의대 학술지 편집위원회 (Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Yeungnam University Institute Medical Science)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Improvement of catheter-related outcomes after application of tunneled cuffed hemodialysis catheter insertion without fluoroscopy

  • Kang, Seok Hui (Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yeungnam University College of Medicine) ;
  • Do, Jun Young (Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yeungnam University College of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2019.06.30
  • 심사 : 2020.03.06
  • 발행 : 2020.07.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Background: Non-tunneled catheters (NTCs) are used for hemodialysis (HD) in many centers in which fluoroscopy is not easily accessed despite high complication rates and conditions requiring long-term HD. Therefore, here we aimed to evaluate the superiority of catheter-related outcomes after the application of tunneled cuffed catheter (TCC) without fluoroscopy versus unconditioned NTC insertion. Methods: We divided the participants into two phases: those receiving NTCs between March 2010 and February 2011 (phase I), and those receiving TCCs or NTCs between March 2011 and February 2012 (phase II). Catheter survival, nurse satisfaction, and reasons for catheter removal were analyzed. Results: Two hundred and sixty patients in phase I and 300 patients in phase II were enrolled in this study. The success rate of TCC insertion was 99.2%. The catheter survival rate in phase I was 65.5% at 1 month, while that in phase II was 74.9% at 1 month (p=0.023). We compared catheter survival between TCCs and NTCs for all periods regardless of phase. The TCC survival rate was higher than the NTC survival rate (p<0.001). Catheter-associated problems led to catheter removal in 97 patients (26.6%) in phase I and 68 patients (18.5%) in phase II (p=0.009). Among 14 HD nurses, all reported being satisfied with manipulation during pre-/post-HD, manupulation during HD, and overall. Eleven HD nurses (78.6%) reported being satisfied with the workload. Conclusion: Compared with unconditional NTC insertion for HD, TCC insertion without fluoroscopy improved the overall catheter survival and nurse satisfaction rates.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. US Renal Data System. USRDS 2011 annual data report: atlas of chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease in the United States [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 2011 [cited 2019 May 30]. http://www.usrds.org/adr.aspx.
  2. McDonald S, Excell L, Livingstone B. ANZDATA: Australia and New Zealand dialysis and transplant registry [Internet]. Adelaide (AU): ANZDATA Registry; [cited 2019 May 30]. http://www.anzdata.org.au/anzdata/.
  3. Jin DC. Current status of dialysis therapy in Korea. Korean J Intern Med 2011;26:123-31. https://doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2011.26.2.123
  4. Yoon HE, Chung S, Chung HW, Shin MJ, Lee SJ, Kim YS, et al. Status of initiating pattern of hemodialysis: a multi-center study. J Korean Med Sci 2009;24(Suppl 2):S102-8. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2009.24.S1.S102
  5. Vats HS. Complications of catheters: tunneled and nontunneled. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis 2012;19:188-94. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ackd.2012.04.004
  6. Ponikvar R. Hemodialysis catheters. Ther Apher Dial 2005;9:218-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1774-9987.2005.00258.x
  7. Vascular Access Work Group. Clinical practice guidelines for vascular access. Am J Kidney Dis 2006;48(Suppl 1):S248-73. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2006.04.040
  8. Hwang HS, Kang SH, Choi SR, Sun IO, Park HS, Kim Y. Comparison of the palindrome vs. step-tip tunneled hemodialysis catheter: a prospective randomized trial. Semin Dial 2012;25:587-91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-139X.2012.01054.x
  9. Kang SH, Park WK, Do JY, Cho KH, Park JW, Yoon KW. J-tip guide wire entrapment within the heart during central venous catheterization. Hemodial Int 2012;16:438-40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1542-4758.2011.00638.x
  10. Oliver MJ. Acute dialysis catheters. Semin Dial 2001;14:432-5. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-139x.2001.00107.x
  11. Wang K, Wang P, Liang X, Lu X, Liu Z. Epidemiology of haemodialysis catheter complications: a survey of 865 dialysis patients from 14 haemodialysis centres in Henan province in China. BMJ Open 2015;5:e007136. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007136
  12. Mendu ML, May MF, Kaze AD, Graham DA, Cui S, Chen ME, et al. Non-tunneled versus tunneled dialysis catheters for acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy: a prospective cohort study. BMC Nephrol 2017;18:351. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-017-0760-x
  13. Yevzlin AS, Song GU, Sanchez RJ, Becker YT. Fluoroscopically guided vs modified traditional placement of tunneled hemodialysis catheters: clinical outcomes and cost analysis. J Vasc Access 2007;8:245-51. https://doi.org/10.1177/112972980700800405
  14. Yeum CH, Kim SW, Nah MY, Ma SK, Ko JH, Kim NH, et al. Percutaneous catheterization of the internal jugular vein for hemodialysis. Korean J Intern Med 2001;16:242-6. https://doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2001.16.4.242
  15. Beathard GA, Litchfield T; Physician Operators Forum of RMS Lifeline Inc. Effectiveness and safety of dialysis vascular access procedures performed by interventional nephrologists. Kidney Int 2004;66:1622-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00928.x
  16. Motta Elias R, da Silva Makida SC, Abensur H, Martins Castro MC, Affonso Moyses RM, Pereira BJ, et al. Insertion of tunneled hemodialysis catheters without fluoroscopy. J Vasc Access 2010;11:138-42. https://doi.org/10.1177/112972981001100210