대한소아치과학회지 (Journal of the korean academy of Pediatric Dentistry)

  • 제47권1호
  • /
  • Pages.25-35
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 1226-8496(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-3819(eISSN)
대한소아치과학회 (Korean Academy of Pediatric Dentistry)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

CBCT를 이용한 유구치의 치근 및 근관의 형태학적 평가

Assessment of Root and Root Canal Morphology of Human Primary Molars using CBCT

  • 최유민 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 김선미 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 최남기 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 소아치과학교실)
  • Choi, Yoomin (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Kim, Seonmi (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Choi, Namki (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University)
  • 투고 : 2019.07.29
  • 심사 : 2019.09.05
  • 발행 : 2020.02.29
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

이 연구의 목적은 CBCT를 사용하여 유구치 치근 및 근관의 형태학적 특징을 평가하는 것이다. 과잉치 발거를 위해 전남대학교 치과병원 소아치과에 내원하여 CBCT를 촬영한 만 4 - 5세 환자 총 68명의 영상으로 연구를 진행하였다. 치근 흡수가 되지 않은 상악 제1유구치, 상악 제2유구치, 하악 제1유구치, 하악 제2유구치로 구분하여 분석하였다. 치근 및 근관의 수, 치근 및 근관의 길이와 각도 등의 다양한 변수들이 분석되었다. 상악 유구치는 모두 3개의 치근을 가졌고 원심 협측 치근과 구개 치근은 단일 근관을 가졌다. 한 치근에 2개의 근관이 있는 경우는 오직 상악 제2유구치의 근심 협측 치근에서 발견되었다. 하악 유구치는 대부분 근심과 원심 2개의 치근을 가졌다. 하악의 근심 치근은 대부분 2개의 근관을 가졌다. 치근의 길이와 관련하여, 상악의 구개 치근의 길이가 가장 긴 반면, 원심 협측 치근의 길이는 가장 짧은 것으로 밝혀졌다. 하악 유구치는 근심의 치근이 더 길었다. 상악 유구치에서는 구개 치근의 각도가 가장 컸으나 하악은 근심의 각도가 더 작았다. 상악 유구치의 치근 및 근관이 곡선형이 많은 반면 하악 유구치는 직선형을 더 많이 볼 수 있었다.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the morphological characteristics of the roots and roots canals of primary molar teeth using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT). A total of 68 CBCT images of children aged 4 - 5 years was used for this study. A total of 160 molar teeth were analyzed. Various parameters such as the number of roots and canals, length of root and root canal, and the angulation and shape of the roots were analyzed. All maxillary primary molars had 3 roots. The presence of 2 root canals in 1 root was only observed in the mesiobuccal root of maxillary primary second molars. Most mandibular primary molars had 2 roots, and most mesial roots had 2 root canals. Concerning the length of the roots, the palatal root of the maxillary primary molar was found to be longest whereas the distobuccal root was shortest. In mandibular primary molars, the mesial root was longer than the distal root. In maxillary primary molars, the palatal root had the greatest angulation whereas the distal root has the greatest in mandibular molars. The root and root canals of maxillary primary molars were more curved in shape whereas mandibular primary molars were straight.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Fanning, E. : Effect of extraction of deciduous molars on the formation and eruption of their successors. Angle Orthod , 32:44-53, 1962.
  2. Nowak AJ, Christensen JR, Wells MH, et al.: Pediatric dentistry: infancy through adolescence, 6th ed. Elsevier, 262-263, 2019.
  3. Hibbard ED, Ireland RL : Morphology of the root canals of the primary molar teeth. J Dent Child , 24:250-257, 1957.
  4. Davis SR, Brayton SM, Goldman M : The morphology of prepared root canal: a study utilizing injectable silicone. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol , 34:642-648, 1972. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(72)90348-9
  5. Mayo CV, Montgomery S, de Rio C : A computerized method for evaluating root canal morphology. J Endod , 12:2-7, 1986. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(86)80274-6
  6. Neelakantan P, Subbarao C, Subbarao CV : Comparative evaluation of modified canal staining and clearing technique, conebeam computed tomography, peripheral quantitative computed tomography, spiral computed tomography, and plain and contrast medium-enhanced digital radiography in studying root canal morphology. J Endod , 36:1547-1551, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.05.008
  7. Sandhya R, Velmurugan N, Kandaswamy D : Assessment of root canal morphology of mandibular first premolars in the Indian population using spiral computed tomography: an in vitro study. Indian J Dent Res , 21:169-173, 2010. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9290.66626
  8. Cleghorn BM, Boorberg NB, Christie WH : Primary human teeth and their root canal systems. Endod Topics , 23:6-33, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1111/etp.12000
  9. Trope M, Elfenbein L, Tronstad L : Mandibular premolars with more than one root canal in different race groups. J Endod , 12:343-345, 1986. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(86)80035-8
  10. Kim HH, Jo HH, Min JB, Hwang HK : CBCT study of mandibular first molars with a distolingual root in Koreans. Restor Dent Endod , 43:e33, 2018. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2018.43.e33
  11. Jeong H, Park SJ, Park SH, Choi GW : Morphology of the apical root canal system in Korean mandibular first molar. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent, 34:137-144. 2009. https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2009.34.2.137
  12. Nielsen RB, Alyassin AM, Lancaster J, et al.: Microcomputed tomography: an advanced system for detailed endodontic research. J Endod , 21:561-568, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80986-6
  13. Maret D, Telmon N, Sixou M, et al.: Effect of voxel size on the accuracy of 3D reconstructions with cone beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol , 41:649-655, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmf/81804525
  14. Liu JF, Dai PW, Tu MG, et al.: Prevalence of 3-rooted primary mandibular second molars among chinese patients. Pediatr Dent , 32:123-126, 2010.
  15. Tu MG, Liu JF, Huang HL, et al.: Prevalence of three-rooted primary mandibular first molars in Taiwan. J Formos Med Assoc , 109:69-74, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-6646(10)60023-X
  16. Song JS, Kim SO, Lee JH, et al.: Incidence and relationship of an additional root in the mandibular first permanent molar and primary molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod , 107:e56-60, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.09.004
  17. Ozcan G, Sekerci AE, Dogan S, et al.: Evaluation of root canal morphology of human primary molars by using CBCT and comprehensive review of the literature. Acta Odontol Scand , 74:250-258, 2016. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2015.1104721
  18. Zoremchhingi, Joseph T, Varma B, Mungara J : A study of root canal morphology of human primary molars using computerized tomography: an in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent , 23:7-12, 2005. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-4388.16019
  19. Bagherian A, Kalhori KA, Parisay I, et al.: An in vitro study of root and canal morphology of human deciduous molars in an Iranian population. J Oral Sci , 52:397-403, 2010. https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.52.397
  20. Sarkar S, Rao AP : Number of root canals, their shape, configuration, accessory root canals in radicular pulp morphology. A preliminary study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent , 20:93-97, 2002.
  21. Aminabadi NA, Farahani RM, Gajan EB : Study of root canal accessibility in human primary molars. J Oral Sci , 50:69-74, 2008. https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.50.69
  22. Gaurav V, Srivastava N, Rana V, Adlakha VK : A study of root canal morphology of human primary incisors and molars using cone beam computerized tomography: an in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent , 31:254-259, 2013. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-4388.121827
  23. Wang YL, Chang HH, Lin CP, et al.: A study on the root canal morphology of primary molars by high-resolution computed tomography. J Dent Sci , 8:321-327, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2013.04.002
  24. Fumes AC, Sousa-Neto MD, Consolaro A, et al.: Root canal morphology of primary molars: a micro-computed tomography study. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent , 15:317-326, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-014-0117-0
  25. Reddy NV, Daneswari V, Niharika P, et al.: Three-dimensional assessment of root canal morphology of human deciduous molars using cone beam computed tomography: An In vitro Study. Int J Pedod Rehabil , 3:36-41, 2018. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpr.ijpr_21_17
  26. Vertucci FJ : Root canal morphology and its relationship to endodontic procedures. Endod Topics , 10:3-29, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-1546.2005.00129.x
  27. Ngan P, Alkire RG, Fields H Jr. : Management of space problems in the primary and mixed dentitions. J Am Dent Assoc , 130:1330-1339, 1999. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1999.0403
  28. Glenn FB : A consecutive six-year study of the prevalence of congenitally missing teeth in private practice of two geographically separated areas. J Dent Child , 31:269-270, 1964.
  29. Grahnen H : Hypodontia in the permanent dentition. Dent Abstr, 3:308-309, 1957.
  30. Nattress BR, Martin DM : Predictability of radiographic diagnosis of variation in root canal anatomy in mandibular incisor and premolar teeth. Int Endod J , 24:58-62, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1991.tb00808.x
  31. Omer OE, Al Shalabi RM, Claffey NM, et al.: A comparison between clearing and radiographic techniques in the study of the root-canal anatomy of maxillary first and second molars. Int Endod J , 37:291-296, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0143-2885.2004.00731.x