한국심리학회지:학교 (Korean Journal of School Psychology)

학교심리학회 (Korean School Psychology Association)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

거부민감성과 이성관계 만족의 관계에서 인지적 정서조절과 갈등해결전략의 이중매개 효과

Double mediation effects of cognitive emotion regulation strategy and conflict resolution strategy on the association between rejection sensitivity and dating relationship satisfaction

  • 고은영 (우석대학교 상담심리학과) ;
  • 김미경 (경희대학교 심리상담연구소)
  • Koh, Eun Young (Department of Counseling Psychology Woosuk University) ;
  • Kim, Mikyung (Student Counseling Center Kyung Hee University)
  • 투고 : 2020.06.23
  • 심사 : 2020.07.28
  • 발행 : 2020.08.30
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 거부민감성과 이성관계 만족의 관계에서 인지적 측면인 인지적 정서조절과 행동적 측면인 갈등해결전략의 매개효과를 검증하여 거부민감성 모델의 적용에 대해 검토하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 서울소재 대학 대학생 668명(남 232명, 여 436명, 평균연령, 21.59세(SD=2.08))을 대상으로 변인 간 관계에 대한 매개모형을 설정하여 관계를 검증하였다. 그 결과, 거부민감성과 이성관계 만족과의 관계에서 인지적 정서조절 전략 중 적응적 정서조절 전략과 갈등해결전략 중 통합과 타협 전략의 이중 매개효과를 확인하였다. 즉, 거부민감성이 이성관계 만족과 직접적인 부적인 상관을 보여 거부민감성이 높을 경우 이성관계 만족은 낮아질 것으로 예상할 수 있다. 다만, 상황을 긍정적으로 해석하고 초점을 확대한 적응적 인지적 정서조절전략과 서로 적극적으로 문제를 해결하고자 하는 통합과 타협의 갈등해결전략을 통해 이성관계 만족에 긍정적인 변화를 가져올 수 있음을 확인한 것이다. 이러한 결과를 바탕으로 상담실제에 대한 함의와 개입방향에 대해 논의하였다.

This study examined how the rejection sensitivity model might be applied to the link between rejection sensitivity and dating relationship satisfaction by means of investigating the mediating effect of cognitive emotion regulation strategy and conflict resolution strategy. A total of 668 college students in Seoul (232 males, 436 females, mean age of 21.59 years [SD=2.08]) participated in this study. The results illustrated that the adaptive emotion regulation strategy, among cognitive emotion regulation strategies, and the integration and compromise strategies, among conflict resolution strategies, had the double mediation effect on the association between rejection sensitivity and dating relationship satisfaction. In other words, a direct negative correlation between rejection sensitivity and dating relationship satisfation resulted in high rejection sensitivity, which was expected to generate low satisfaction in dating relationships. However, it was confirmed that the use of these two strategies-the cognitive emotion regulation and the conflict resolution strategy-could bring positive effects in terms of the dating relationship satisfaction; the former helped couples to see situations more broadly and increase positive perceptions, while the latter solve their problems each other. Based on these findings, we discuss their implications for counseling practice and therapeutic interventions

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 김소희 (2004). 스트레스 사건, 인지적 정서조절 전략과 심리적 안녕감 간의 관계. 가톨릭대학교 대학원 석사학위 논문.
  2. 김은지 (2016). 부모애착이 이성관계 만족도에 미치는 영향, 거부민감성의 매개효과. 가톨릭대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.
  3. 김지현 (2006). 조망수용, 관계귀인, 갈등대처 행동 및 이성교제 만족도 간의 관계. 가톨릭대학교 상담심리대학원 석사학위논문.
  4. 박나현 (2016). 미혼 성인남녀의 성인애착과 이성관계 만족도의 관계: 인지 정서조절전략과 사회지지 추구의 매개효과. 영남대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.
  5. 박소영, "대학생 고민 1순위는 취업?... '주변관계'를 더 걱정했다", 한국일보, 1021, 2017.
  6. 박영은 (2017). 거부민감성과 이성관계 만족의 관계에서 자기자비와 인지적 정서조절전략의 매개효과. 가톨릭대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.
  7. 박희경 (2011). 성인애착과 갈등해결전략의 관계: 거부민감성의 매개효과. 이화여자대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.
  8. 우종필 (2012). 우종필 교수의 구조방정식 모델 개념과 이해. 서울: 한나래아카데미.
  9. 이경성, 한덕웅 (2003). 결혼적응검사의 개발. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 8, 679-705.
  10. 이경성, 한덕웅 (2005). 친밀한 이성관계에서 이상과 현재의 차이가 관계만족에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지 사회 및 성격, 19(1), 163-184.
  11. 이민선, 노안영 (2018). 대학생의 거부민감성과 연애관계 만족도와의 관계에서 인지적 정서조절과 자기침묵의 이중매개효과. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 30(4), 1175-1192.
  12. 이복동 (2000). 성인 애착과 이성관계 만족-거부 민감성과 귀인 양식의 매개효과를 중심으로. 고려대학교 대학원 석사학위 논문.
  13. 이설아, 박기환 (2013). 유기 도식과 이성관계 만족도의 관계에서 인지적 정서 조절 전략의 매개효과. 인지행동치료, 13(1), 1-17.
  14. 조재숙 (2017). 연애경험에서 거부민감성이 이성 관계 만족에 미치는 영향: 갈등대처 행동을 매개로. 순천향대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.
  15. 홍종배 (2006). 글로벌시대의 갈등 관리: 한국인과 미국인의 문화 내 및 문화 간 갈등 관리 전략의 비교. 스피치와 커뮤니케이션, 6, 168-201.
  16. 현소진 (2019). 대학생의 이성관계만족도, 아동기 정서적 학대경험, 성인애착불안 및 거부 민감성의 구조적 관계 분석. 한양대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.
  17. 황여주 (2013). 미혼 남녀의 정서조절과 이성관계 만족도 관계에서 갈등대처방략의 매개효과와 갈등빈도의 조절효과. 이화여자대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.
  18. Ayduk O., Mendoza-Denton R., Mischel W., Downey G., Peake P. K., Rodriguez M.. (2000). Regulating the interpersonal self: strategic self-regulation for coping with rejection sensitivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 776-792. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.79.5.776
  19. Ayduk, O., May, D., Downey. G., & Higgins, E. T. (2003). Tactical difference in coping with rejection sensitivity; The role of prevention pride. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(4), 435-448. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202250911
  20. Ayduk, O., Zayas, V., Downey, G., Cole, A. B., Shoda, Y., & Mischel, W. (2008). Rejection sensitivity and executive control: Joint predictors of borderline personality features. Jornal of Research in Personality, 42, 151-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2007.04.002
  21. Ayduk, Ozlem & Mischel, Walter & Downey, Geraldine. (2002). Attentional Mechanisms Linking Rejection to Hostile Reactivity: The Role of "Hot" Versus "Cool" Focus. Psychological science. 13. 443-8. 10.1111/1467-9280.00478.
  22. Bandalos, D. L. (2002). The Effects of Item Parceling on Goodness-of-Fit and Parameter Estimate Bias in Structural Equation Modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 78-102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0901_5
  23. Baron, R., & Kenny, D. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 51. 1173-1182. 10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173.
  24. Birditt, K. S., Brown, E., Orbuch, T. L. and McIlvane, J. M. (2010) Marital Conflict Behaviors and Implications for Divorce over 16 Years. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 72, 1188-1204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00758.x
  25. Braithwaite, S. R., Delevi, R., & Fincham, F. D. (2010). Romantic relationships and the physical and mental health of college students. Personal Relationships, 17(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01248.x
  26. Derryberry, D., & Reed, M. A. (2002). Anxiety-related attentional biases and their regulation by attentional control. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111, 225-236. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.111.2.225
  27. De Dreu, C. K. W., Evers, A., Beersma, B., Kluwer, E. S. and Nauta, A. (2001), A theory-based measure of conflict management strategies in the workplace. J. Organiz. Behav., 22: 645-668. doi:10.1002/job.107
  28. Dodge & Somberg (1987). Hostile attributional biases among aggressive boys are exacerbated under conditions of threats to the self. Child Development, 58, 213-224. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1987.tb03501.x
  29. Downey, G., & Feldman, S. I. (1996). Implications of Rejection Sensitivity for Intimate Relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(6), 1327-1343. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.6.1327
  30. Downey, G., Freitas, A. L., Michaelis, B., & Khouri, H. (1998). The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy in Close Relationships: Rejection Sensitivity and Rejection by Romantic Partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(2), 545-560. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.2.545
  31. Downey, G., Mougios, V., Ayduk, O., London, B. E., & Shoda, Y. (2004). Rejection sensitivity and the defensive motivational system: Insights from the startle response to rejection cues. Psychological Science, 15, 668-673. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00738.x
  32. Erikson, E. (1971). Erikson's pscychological theory. New York: Doubledy Anchor.
  33. Furman, W., & Shaffer, L. (2003). The role of romantic relationships in adolescent development. In P. Florsheim (Ed.), Adolescent romantic relations and sexual behavior: Theory, research, and practical implications (pp. 3-22). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  34. Garnefski, N., Kraaij, V. (2007). The cognitive emotion regulation questionnarie: Psychometric features and prospective relationships with depression and anxiety in adults. European Journal of psychological Assessment, 23(3), 141-149. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.23.3.141
  35. Garnefski, N., Kraaij, V., & Spinhoven, P. (2001). Negative Life events, cognitive emotion regulation and emotional problems. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 1311-1327. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00113-6
  36. Gross, J. J. (2015). Emotion Regulation: Current Status and Future Prospects. Psychological Inquiry, 26, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2014.940781
  37. Hong, J. (2005). Conflict management in an age of globalization: a comparison of intacultural and intercultural conflict management strategies between Koreans and Americans. Global Media Journal, 4(6), 169-202.
  38. Impett, E. A., Gables, S. L., & Peplau, L. A. (2005). Giving up and giving in: The costs and benefits of daily sacrifice in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(3), 327-344. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.3.327
  39. Khaleque, A., Uddin, M., Hossain, K., Siddique, N., & Shirin, A. (2019). Perceived Parental Acceptance-Rejection in Childhood Predict Psychological Adjustment and Rejection Sensitivity in Adulthood. Psychological Studies. 64. 10.1007/s12646-019-00508-z.
  40. Karney, B. R, & Bradbury, T. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, method, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 3-34. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.118.1.3
  41. Kelly, C., Huston, T. L., & Cate, R. M. (1985). Premarital relationship correlates of the erosion of satisfaction in marriage. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2, 167-178. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407585022004
  42. Karoly, P. (1993). Mechanism of self-regulation: A systems view. Annual Reviews of Psychology, 44, 23-52. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.44.020193.000323
  43. Lantagne, A., Furman, W., & Novak, J. (2017). "Stay or leave": Predictors of relationship dissolution in emerging adulthood. Emerging Adulthood, 5(4), 241-250. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696817699750
  44. Leggett, D. G., Roberts-Pittman, B., Byczek, S., & Morse, D. T. (2012). Cooperation, conflict, and marital satisfaction: Bridging theory, research, and practice. The Journal of Individual Psychology, 68(2), 182-199.
  45. Levy, S. R., Ayduk, O., & Downey, G. (2001). The role of rejection sensitivity in people's relationships with significant others and valued social groups. In M. R. Leary (Ed.), Interpersonal rejection (p. 251-289). Oxford University Press.
  46. McNulty, J. K., & Russell, V. M. (2010). When "negative" behaviors are positive: A contextual analysis of the long-term effects of problem-solving behaviors on changes in relationship satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(4), 587-604. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017479
  47. Metcalfe, J., & Mischel, W. (1999). A hot/cool-system analysis of delay of gratification: Dynamics of willpower. Psychological Review, 106(1), 3-19. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.106.1.3
  48. Mischel, W., Shoda, Y., & Rodriguez, M. L. (1989). Delay of gratification in children. Science, 244, 933-938. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2658056
  49. Preti, E., Casini, E., Richetin, J., De Panfilis, C., & Fontana, A. (2018). Cognitive and Emotional Components of Rejection Sensitivity: Independent Contributions to Adolescent Self- and Interpersonal Functioning. Assessment. 10.1177/1073191118817866.
  50. Rahim, M. A. (1983). A measure of styles of handling interpersonal conflict. Academy of Management Journal, 26(2), 368-376. https://doi.org/10.2307/255985
  51. Rahim, A. M. (2002). Toward a Theory of Managing Organizational Conflict. The International Journal of Conflict Management. 13(3), 206-23. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022874
  52. Rahim, A., & Bonoma, T. V. (1979). Managing organizational conflict: A model for diagnosis and intervention. Psychological Reports, 44(3, Pt 2), 1323-1344. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1979.44.3c.1323
  53. Rahim, M. A., & Magner, N. R. (1995). Confirmatory factor analysis of the styles of handling interpersonal conflict: First-order factor model and its invariance across groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(1), 122-132. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.80.1.122
  54. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
  55. Scheeren, P., de Andrade Vieira, R. V., Goulart, V. R., & Wagner, A. (2014). Marital quality and attachment: The mediator role of conflict resolution styles. Paideia, 24(58), 177-186. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-43272458201405
  56. Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7(4), 422-445. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.7.4.422
  57. Wheeler, L. A., Updegraff, K., & Thayer, S. M. (2010). Conflict resolution in mexican-origin couples: Culture, gender, and marital quality. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(4), 991-1005. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00744.x
  58. Vescio, T. K., Gervais, S. J., Snyder, M., & Hoover, A. (2005). Power and the Creation of Patronizing Environments: The Stereotype-Based Behaviors of the Powerful and Their Effects on Female Performance in Masculine Domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(4), 658-672. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.4.658
  59. Vicario, M., Hudgins-Mitchell, C., & Corbisello, G. (2012). The Foster Parent Suurvival Guide. Cncinnati, OH: Finding Hope Counseling.
  60. Wilmot, W. W., & Hocker, J. L. (2001). Interpersonal Conflict(6th ed). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.