한국가정과교육학회지 (Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association)

한국가정과교육학회 (Korea Home Economics Education Association)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

스마트러닝 기반 중학교 가정교과 소비생활 교수-학습안 개발

Development of Consumer Education Teaching-Learning Process for SMART Learning-Based Middle School Home Economics Education

  • 서유리 (한국교원대학교 대학원) ;
  • 채정현 (한국교원대학교 가정교육과)
  • Seo, Yu Ri (Graduate School of Home Economics Education, Korea National University of Education) ;
  • Chae, Jung Hyun (Home Economics Education, Korea National University of Education)
  • 투고 : 2020.12.13
  • 심사 : 2021.01.09
  • 발행 : 2020.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구의 목적은 스마트러닝 기반 중학교 가정교과 소비생활 교수-학습안을 개발하고 이 교수-학습안의 타당성과 교수-학습안 전반을 평가하여 온라인(비대면) 가정교과 수업에 도움을 주는데 있다. 본 연구에서의 교수-학습안은 분석, 설계, 개발, 평가의 과정을 거쳐 완성되었다. 본 연구의 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 2015 개정 교육과정 중학교 「기술·가정」 ① 교과서 12종의 소비생활 단원을 분석한 결과 학습요소별 활동 주제에 대한 빈도를 분석하였으며, 12종의 교과서 중 2개의 교과서만이 스마트러닝 활동을 제시하고 있었다. 둘째, 본 연구의 스마트러닝 기반 중학교 가정교과 소비생활 교수-학습안의 특징은 학습자가 교수·학습 활동의 주체가 될 수 있도록 주제와 내용을 구성하였다는 것과 학습자가 흥미를 가질 수 있는 다양한 매체와 최신 이슈를 반영한 것, 온라인 수업을 전제한 것, 실시간 토의 및 협업이 가능한 소프트웨어를 활용한 것, 평가 방식 또한 온라인 활동으로 구성하였다는 것이다. 셋째, 전문가 평가 결과 개발한 교수-학습안과 활동 자료는 차시별 주제, 목표, 내용, 교수·학습 활동, 평가에 대하여 평균 4.52(5점 리커트 척도), 전체 타당도 지수(CVI)는 0.95, 교수-학습안 전반에 대한 전문가 평가 결과 실행 적절성, 유익성, 동기 유발 가능성, 유용성, 실행가능성에 대하여 평균 4.62로 높게 나타났다. 교수-학습안에 대한 전문가 의견을 반영하여 교수-학습안과 활동 자료를 최종적으로 수정·보완하여 완성하였다. COVID-19 사태 이후 오프라인 수업의 한계를 극복하여 온라인 수업을 전제로 교수·학습 활동을 개발한 본 연구는 온라인으로 수업이 진행될 때에는 Zoom이라는 온라인회의 플랫폼을 사용하고, 오프라인으로 수업이 진행될 때에는 학교 공간 안에서 교수·학습 활동을 온라인으로 운영할 수 있는 방식으로 온/오프 병행이 가능하여 COVID-19로 인한 비대면/대면 가정교과 수업에 도움을 주고자 하는데 그 의의가 있다.

The purpose of this study was to develop and evaluate a Smart learning-based middle school home economics education plan to improve the online home economics education classes. The educational plan in this study was completed through the process of analysis, design, development, and evaluation. The results of this study are as follows. First, as a result of analyzing consumer life units in the middle school textbooks based on 2015-revised curriculum, Smart learning activities were presented in only two out of the 12 textbooks analyxed. Second, a Smart learning-based middle school home economics education plan was developed in this study with the following characteristics: the topics and contents are structured so that to help learners actively engage in the teaching and learning activities; the education plan to reflects various media and current issues that learners may be interested in; the lesson plans were structured with the premise of online classes; softwares that enable real-time discussion and collaboration are used; and the evaluation method are composed of online activities. Third, the expert evaluation scores for the educational plan and activity materials developed were 4.52 (5-point Likert scale), when averaged across subject, goal, content, teaching/learning activity, and evaluation, and the overall content validity index(CVI) was 0.95. The adequacy of execution, benefit, attractiveness, usefulness, and feasibility were highly with an average of 4.62. Based on the experts' comments, the education plan and activity materials were revised and completed. This study is meaningful in that it developed teaching and learning activities based on online classes after the COVID-19 outbreak, overcoming the limitations of offline classes. It has implications for face-to-face home economics classes due to COVID-19, as it suggests ways to blend online and offline teaching/learning activities depending on the situation.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bae, S. Y., & Son, J. Y. (2013). A study on the consumer education implementation system in korea (Policy research report 13-07). Seoul: Korean Consumer Agency. Available from http://searchi.kca.go.kr/libtechuploa/2481576.pdf
  2. Bang, S. H. (2012). A study on strategies of self-directed learning to promote Smart Learning. Journal of Lifelong Learning Society, 8(1), 93-112. https://doi.org/10.26857/JLLS.2012.04.8.1.93
  3. Cheong, E., & Hwang, H. Y. (2017). A study on education and human character development in consumer society. Journal of Yeolin Education, 25(3), 1-20.
  4. Choi, A. Y. (2015). A study on the objectives of communication design education for the generation Z. Journal of the Korean Society Design Culture, 21(3), 675-683.
  5. Do, J. W. (2020). An investigation of design constraints in the process of converting face-to-face course into online course. Journal of Education Culture Research, 26(2), 153-173.
  6. Jang, S. H. (2013). The case study on smart education of converging with education 3.0 and ICT. The Korea Contents Association Review, 11(1), 35-39. https://doi.org/10.20924/CCTHBL.2013.11.1.035
  7. Kang, J. H. (2011). A study on utilizing SNS to vitalize smart learning. Journal of Digital Convergence, 9(5), 265-274. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDPM.2011.9.5.265
  8. Kang, J. Y., Lee, Y. D., & Kim, J. S. (2020). A semantic networking analysis of news data regarding 'Generation Z' utilizing text mining. Journal of Future Oriented Youth Society, 17(2), 14-48.
  9. Kim, H. B., Kim, S. H., & Park, J. M. (2011). A study on the strategies to facilitate debate in smart-learning environment. Korean Journal of Learning Sciences, 5(1), 79-114.
  10. Kim, H. S. (2020, April 14). 온라인 개학의 두 가지 딜레마 [Two dilemmas of online school opening]. Edu in News. Retrieved from http://www.eduinnews.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=28404
  11. Kim, S. Y. (2017). 10 years of framework act on consumers, the evaluation and prospects of consumer education by consumer expert. Journal of Consumer Problem Research, 48(2), 87-119.
  12. Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation (2005). Content development guidelines for teaching and learning, guidelines for content quality management content quality management programs: focusing on general theory and 10 common basic subjects. Seoul: Author.
  13. Lee, K. C. (1999). Consumer education: theory & practice. Seoul: Gyomoon.
  14. Lim, B. R., Leem, J. H., & Sung, E. M. (2013). What is the concept of smart eduction and the typology of smart education contents?. Journal of Educational Technology, 29(3), 459-489. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.29.3.459
  15. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2011). 인재대국으로 가는 길, 스마트교육 추진 전략 실행계획 [The road to a talented nation, smart learning implementation strategy execution plan]. Retrieved from https://www.moe.go.kr/sn3hcv/doc.html?fn=f82c54c8f759324e8a36b73084e56a22&rs=/upload/synap/202101/
  16. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2015). Practical arts (technology.home economics).Information curriculum (Notification No. 2015-74). Sejong: Author.
  17. Untact Marketing (n.d.). In Naver encyclopedia of knowledge. Retrieved from https://terms.naver.com/entry.nhn?docId=4368994&cid=43667&categoryId=43667
  18. You, D. R. (2013). Consumer education in a "value-conscious consumption" society. Journal of Social Science Thesis, 12, 111-129.
  19. Yu, I. Y., & Park, M. J. (2019). Development of 'healthy couple relationship' curriculum in high school based on backward design. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 31(3), 1-21.
  20. 韓, 세계 최고 '연결사회'...인터넷.스마트폰 사용률 1위 [Korea, the world's best connected society... no. 1 in Internet and smartphone usage rate]. (2018, June 24). Retrieved from https://www.yna.co.kr/view/AKR20180622141000017?input=1195m