DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Endomicrobial Community Profiles of Two Different Mealybugs: Paracoccus marginatus and Ferrisia virgata

  • Jose, Polpass Arul (Department of Agricultural Microbiology, Agricultural College and Research Institute, Madurai, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University) ;
  • Krishnamoorthy, Ramasamy (Department of Agricultural Microbiology, Agricultural College and Research Institute, Madurai, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University) ;
  • Gandhi, Pandiyan Indira (Regional Research Station, Vridhachalam, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University) ;
  • Senthilkumar, Murugaiyan (Department of Agricultural Microbiology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University) ;
  • Janahiraman, Veeranan (Department of Agricultural Microbiology, Agricultural College and Research Institute, Madurai, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University) ;
  • Kumutha, Karunandham (Department of Agricultural Microbiology, Agricultural College and Research Institute, Madurai, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University) ;
  • Choudhury, Aritra Roy (Department of Environmental and Biological Chemistry, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Samaddar, Sandipan (Department of Environmental and Biological Chemistry, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Anandham, Rangasamy (Department of Agricultural Microbiology, Agricultural College and Research Institute, Madurai, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University) ;
  • Sa, Tongmin (Department of Environmental and Biological Chemistry, Chungbuk National University)
  • Received : 2020.01.13
  • Accepted : 2020.03.31
  • Published : 2020.07.28

Abstract

Mealybugs (Hemiptera: Coccomorpha: Pseudococcidae) harbor diverse microbial symbionts that play essential roles in host physiology, ecology, and evolution. In this study we aimed to reveal microbial communities associated with two different mealybugs, papaya mealybug (Paracoccus marginatus) and two-tailed mealybug (Ferrisia virgata) collected from the same host plant. Comparative analysis of microbial communities associated with these mealybugs revealed differences that appear to stem from phylogenetic associations and different nutritional requirements. This first report on both bacterial and fungal communities associated with these mealybugs provides a preliminary insight on factors affecting the endomicrobial communities.

Keywords

References

  1. Moran NA, McCutcheon JP, Nakabachi A. 2008. Genomics and evolution of heritable bacterial symbionts. Annu. Rev. Genet. 42: 165-190. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.genet.41.110306.130119
  2. Miller DR, Miller GL. 2002. Redescription of Paracoccus marginatus Williams and Granara de Willink (Hemiptera: Coccoidea: Pseudococcidae), including descriptions of the immature stages and adult male. Proc. Entomol. Soc. Wash. 104: 1-23.
  3. Amarasekare KG, Mannion CM, Osborne LS, Epsky ND. 2014. Life history of Paracoccus marginatus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) on four host plant species under laboratory conditions. Environ. Entomol. 37: 630-635. https://doi.org/10.1603/0046-225X(2008)37[630:LHOPMH]2.0.CO;2
  4. Normark BB, Johnson NA. 2011. Niche explosion. Genetica 139: 551-564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10709-010-9513-5
  5. Zindel R, Gottlieb Y, Aebi A. 2011. Arthropod symbioses: a neglected parameter in pest‐and disease‐control programmes. J. Appl. Ecol. 48: 864-872. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.01984.x
  6. Yuval B, Ben-Ami E, Behar A, Ben-Yosef M, Jurkevitch E. 2013. The Mediterranean fruit fly and its bacteria - potential for improving sterile insect technique operations. J. Appl. Entomol. 137: 39-42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0418.2010.01555.x
  7. Yun JH. 2014. Insect gut bacterial diversity determined by environmental habitat, diet, developmental stage, and phylogeny of host. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 80: 5254-5264. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01226-14
  8. Miller DR, Williams DJ, Hamon AB, 1999. Notes on a new mealybug (Hemiptera: Coccoidea: Pseudococcidae) pest in Florida and the Caribbean: the papaya mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus Williams and Granara de Willink. Insecta Mundi 13: 179-181
  9. Kaydan MB, Gullan J. 2012. A taxonomic revision of the mealybug genus Ferrisia fullaway (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) with descriptions of eight new species and a new genus. Zootaxa 3543: 1. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3543.1.1
  10. Hardy NB, Gullan PJ, Hodgson CJ. 2008. A subfamily‐level classification of mealybugs (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) based on integrated molecular and morphological data. Syst. Entomol. 33: 51-71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3113.2007.00408.x
  11. Whiteley AS, Jenkins S, Waite I, Kresoje N, Payne H, Mullan B, et al. 2012. Microbial 16S rRNA Ion Tag and community metagenome sequencing using the Ion Torrent (PGM) Platform. J. Microbiol. Methods 91: 80-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2012.07.008
  12. Shen Y, Nie J, Li Z, Li H, Wu Y, Dong Y, Zhang J. 2018. Differentiated surface fungal communities at point of harvest on apple fruits from rural and peri-urban orchards. Sci. Rep. 8: 2165. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17436-5
  13. Niu B, Fu L, Sun S, Li W. 2010. Artificial and natural duplicates in pyrosequencing reads of metagenomic data. BMC Bioinformatics 11: 187. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-187
  14. Schloss PD, Handelsman J. 2005. Introducing DOTUR, a computer program for defining operational taxonomic units and estimating species richness. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71: 1501-1506. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.3.1501-1506.2005
  15. Yun JH. 2014. Insect gut bacterial diversity determined by environmental habitat, diet, developmental stage, and phylogeny of host. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 80: 5254-5264. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01226-14
  16. Gruwell ME, Hardy NB, Gullan PJ, Dittmar K. 2010. Evolutionary relationships among primary endosymbionts of the mealybug subfamily Phenacoccinae (Hemiptera: Coccoidea: Pseudococcidae). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76: 7521-7525. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01354-10
  17. Iasur-Kruh L, Taha-Salaime L, Robinson WE, Sharon R, Droby S, Perlman SJ, et al. 2015. Microbial associates of the vine mealybug Planococcus ficus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) under different rearing conditions. Microb. Ecol. 69: 204-214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-014-0478-2
  18. Ivens AB, Gadau A, Kiers ET, Kronauer DJ. 2018. Can social partnerships influence the microbiome? Insights from ant farmers and their trophobiont mutualists. Mol. Ecol. 27: 1898-1914. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.14506
  19. Buchner P. 1965. Endosymbiosis of animals with plant microorganisms. pp. 168. USA: Interscience Publishers. (No. QH548 B743)
  20. McCutcheon JP, von Dohlen CD. 2011. An interdependent metabolic patchwork in the nested symbiosis of mealybugs. Curr. Biol. 21: 1366-1372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2011.06.051
  21. Amnuaykanjanasin A, Jirakkakul J, Panyasiri C, Panyarakkit P, Nounurai P, Chantasingh D. 2013. Infection and colonization of tissues of the aphid Myzus persicae and cassava mealybug Phenacoccus manihoti by the fungus Beauveria bassiana. BioControl 58: 379-391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-012-9499-2
  22. Gomez‐Polo P, Ballinger MJ, Lalzar M, Malik A, Ben‐Dov Y, Mozes‐Daube N. 2017. An exceptional family: Ophiocordyceps‐allied fungus dominates the microbiome of soft scale insects (Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha: Coccidae). Mol. Ecol. 26: 5855-5868. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.14332
  23. Arndt D, Xia J, Liu Y, Zhou Y, Guo AC, Cruz JA, et al. 2012. METAGENassist: a comprehensive web server for comparative metagenomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 40: W88-W95. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks497
  24. Douglas AE. 2009. The microbial dimension in insect nutritional ecology. Funct. Ecol. 23: 38-47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2008.01442.x
  25. Florez LV, Biedermann PH, Engl T, Kaltenpoth M. 2015. Defensive symbioses of animals with prokaryotic and eukaryotic microorganisms. Nat. Prod. Rep. 32: 904-936. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5NP00010F

Cited by

  1. Function and insecticidal activity of bacteria associated with papaya mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus Williams & Granara de Willink (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) vol.30, pp.8, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1080/09583157.2020.1765983