DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Analysis of the Relative Importance of Processes in the Closure Phase of Construction Program

건설프로그램 종결단계 업무프로세스의 상대적 중요도 분석

  • Lee, Woo-Yeon (Department of Architectural Engineering, University of Seoul) ;
  • Lee, Seung-Hoon (Marketing Division, Kunwon Engineering Co., Ltd.) ;
  • Cha, Yongwoon (Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology) ;
  • Hyun, Chang-Taek (Department of Architectural Engineering, University of Seoul)
  • Received : 2020.05.06
  • Accepted : 2020.06.17
  • Published : 2020.07.31

Abstract

Various studies on program management have been attempted due to recent changes in the environment of the construction market, and the importance of closure phase in each phase of the construction program is increasing. However, the reality is that the related research is insufficient and the field has been managed in a rule of thumb according to individual capabilities. Therefore, in order to successfully close the construction program and enhance satisfaction of stakeholders in the closure phase of the construction program, the key stakeholders were identified using the Power and Interest Matrix. The relative importance of the closure phase process was analyzed using AHP analysis method. It was also verified through on-site surveys and interviews about the proposed importance of the closure stakeholder and the relative importance of the process. It is expected that this study will increase the satisfaction of stakeholders and contribute to a successful closure if the user puts a lot of resources into the process that has a high priority in the closure phase of the construction program proposed in this study.

최근 건설시장의 환경변화에 따라 프로그램관리에 대한 다양한 연구가 시도되고 있으며 건설프로그램의 생애주기 각 단계 중 종결단계에 업무의 중요도는 증가되고 있다. 그러나 관련된 연구가 미진하고 현장에서는 개인의 역량에 따라 주먹구구식 관리해 온 것이 현실이다. 따라서 건설프로그램 종결단계에서 성공적인 건설프로그램 종결과 이해관계자의 만족도를 높이기 위하여 이해관계자들의 영향력과 관심도 매트릭스 분석기법으로 핵심 이해관계자를 규명하고 AHP분석기법을 활용하여 종결단계 프로세스에 대한 상대적 중요도를 분석하였다. 또한 제안한 종결단계 이해관계자의 중요도와 프로세스에 대한 상대적 중요도의 적정성에 대해 사례적용 및 면담을 통해 검증하였다. 본 연구에서 제안한 건설프로그램의 종결단계 높은 우선순위를 갖는 프로세스에 많은 자원을 투입하여 효과적으로 관리한다면 사용자 등 이해관계자의 만족도를 높이고 성공적인 종결에 기여할 것으로 기대된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Cha, Y.W., Kim, J.H., Hyun, C.T., and Han, S.W. (2018). "Development of a Program Definition Rating Index for the Performance Prediction of Construction Programs." Sustainability, 10(8), p. 2747. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082747
  2. Choi, J.H, Son, J.H, and Kim, J.H. (2015). "Developing a Project and Program Management Capability Assessment System for the Korean Construction Management Firms." Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 16(1). pp. 5-12.
  3. CMAA (2011). Construction Management Standards of Practice, pp. 75-64.
  4. Delaney J. (2014). Construction Program Management, CRC Press, pp. 161-166.
  5. De Furia. G.L. (2008). Project Management Recipes for Success, pp. 223-242.
  6. Flyvbjerg, B. (2017). The Oxford Handbook of Megaproject Management, Oxford University Press, pp. 22-24.
  7. FMI (2009). FMI/CMAA Tenth Annual Survey of Owners, pp. 3-13.
  8. FMI (2007). Practice Makes Perfect, FMI Quarterly Issue 4, p. 58.
  9. Hyun, C.T., and Kim, O.K. (2011). "Construction Program Management." Korea Institute of Construction Engineering and Management translation, Spacetime, p. 19.
  10. ISO 21503 (2017). Project, programme and portfolio management - Guidance on programme management. pp. 13-14.
  11. Karna, S. (2004). "Analysing customer satisfaction and quality in construction - the case of public and private customers." Nordic Journal of Surveying and Real Estate Research, Special Series, 2, 2004Nordic Journal of Surveying and Real Estate Research, Special Series, 2. pp. 76-78.
  12. Kim, I.H. (2018). The Strategic Art of Construction Management, Kimoondang, p. 106.
  13. Lee, B.N., Lee, H.S., Kim, Y.S., and Kim, H.S. (2017). Construction Management are strategies, Construction Economy, p. 259.
  14. Lee, W.Y., Lee, S.H., Cha, Y.W., and Hyun, C.T. (2020). "Identification of Business Process in the Closure Phase of Construction Programs." Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 21(2). pp. 70-78. https://doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2020.21.2.070
  15. MURO (2018). YRP Program Management.
  16. PMI (2017). "A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK(R) Guide)" 6th Edition, pp. 10-20.
  17. PMI (2017). "The Standard for Program Management (SPgM)" 4th Edition, pp. 138-140.
  18. Thiry, M. (2015). Program management, Gower Publishing Company, pp. 253-261.
  19. Thomsen, C., and Sanders, S. (2011). Program Management 2.0, FAIA, FCMAA. pp. 44-47.