Steel and Composite Structures

  • 제34권4호
  • /
  • Pages.487-497
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 1229-9367(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1598-6233(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Seismic behavior of structural and non-structural elements in RC building with bypass viscous dampers

  • Esfandiyari, Reza (Department of Civil Engineering, Islamic Azad University Central Tehran Branch) ;
  • Nejad, Soheil Monajemi (Department of Civil Engineering, Islamic Azad University Central Tehran Branch) ;
  • Marnani, Jafar Asgari (Department of Civil Engineering, Islamic Azad University Central Tehran Branch) ;
  • Mousavi, Seyed Amin (Behsazan Larzeh Davam Co., The Science and Technology Park of University of Tehran) ;
  • Zahrai, Seyed Mehdi (School of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran)
  • 투고 : 2019.09.18
  • 심사 : 2019.12.26
  • 발행 : 2020.02.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

During the last few decades, fluid viscous dampers have been significantly improved in terms of performance and reliability. Viscous dampers dissipate the input energy into heat and the increased temperature may damage internal seals of the damper. As a result, thermal compensation is crucial for almost all fluid viscous dampers. In this study, while referring to the main working principles of the recently developed bypass viscous damper in Iran, a comprehensive case study is conducted on a RC building having diagonal braces equipped with such viscous dampers. Experimental results of a small-scale bypass viscous damper is presented and it is shown that the currently available simplified Maxwell models can simulate behavior of the bypass viscous damper with good accuracy. Using a case study, contribution of bypass viscous dampers to seismic behavior of structural and non-structural elements are investigated. A designed procedure is adopted to increase damping ratio of the building from 3% to 15%. In this way, reductions of 25% and 13% in the required concrete and steel rebar materials have been achieved. From nonlinear time history analyses, it is observed that bypass viscous dampers can greatly improve seismic behavior of structural elements and non-structural elements.

키워드

과제정보

The authors would like to thank the Iran National Science Foundation (INSF) and Science and Technology Park of the Univ. of Tehran for supporting this research.

참고문헌

  1. Abaqus (2016), Dassault Systems Simulia Corp, Providence, RI.
  2. ACI 530 (2013), Building code requirements and specification for masonry structures, American Concrete Institute; Farmington Hills, Michigan, USA.
  3. ASCE 7 (2016), Minimum design loads for the buildings and other structures, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia.
  4. ASCE 41 (2017), Seismic evaluation and retrofit of existing buildings, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia.
  5. Bayat, M. and Bayat, M. (2014), "Seismic behavior of special moment-resisting frames with energy dissipating devices under near source ground motions", Steel Compos. Struct., 16(5), 533-557. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2014.16.5.533.
  6. Black, C. and Makris, N. (2006), "Viscous heating of fluid dampers under wind and seismic loading: experimental studies, mathematical modeling and design formulae", Report No. EERC 2006-01, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of California, Berkeley.
  7. Constantinou, M. and Symans, M. (1992), "Experimental and analytical investigation of seismic response of structures with supplemental fluid viscous dampers", Technical Report NCEER 92-0032; National Center for Earthquake Engineering State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, N.Y, USA.
  8. Constantinou, M.C., Tsopelas, P., Hammel, W. and Sigaher, A.N. (2001), "Toggle-brace-damper seismic energy dissipation systems", J. Struct. Eng., 127(2), 105-112. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:2(105).
  9. Domenico, D.D. and Ricciardi, G. (2019), "Earthquake protection of structures with nonlinear viscous dampers optimized through an energy-based stochastic approach", Eng. Struct., 179, 523-539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.09.076.
  10. Farahi Shahri, S. and Mousavi, S.R. (2018), "Seismic behavior of beam-to-column connections with elliptic slit dampers", Steel Compos. Struct., 26(3), 289-301. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2018.26.3.289.
  11. Kasai, K. and Matsuda, K. (2014), "Full-scale dynamic testing of response-controlled buildings and their components: concepts, methods and findings", Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib., 13, 167-181, https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11803-014-0246-9.
  12. Kasai, K., Pu, W.C. and Wada, A. (2012), "Response of passivelycontrolled tall buildings in Tokyo during 2011 great east Japan earthquake", Proceedings of the 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal, September.
  13. Kim, J., Kim, M. and Nour Eldin, M. (2017), "Optimal distribution of steel plate slit dampers for seismic retrofit of structures", Steel Compos. Struct., 25(4), 473-484. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2017.25.4.473.
  14. KYB Corporation (2018), About Nonconforming Acts in the Inspection Process, etc. for Seismic Isolation/Mitigation Oil Dampers for Buildings Manufactured by Us and Our Subsidiary, http://www.kyb.co.jp/english.
  15. Liu, W., Guo, Y., Dong, X. and He, W. (2019), "Earthquake response control of a super high-rise structure subjected to long-period ground motions via a novel viscous damped system with multi lever mechanism", Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build., 28(7), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2011.653864.
  16. Lin, W.H.L. and Chopra, A.K. (2002), "Earthquake response of elastic SDF systems with non-linear fluid viscous dampers", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 31, 1623-1642. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.179.
  17. Mousavi, S.A., Esfandiyari, R. and Zahrai, S.M. (2018), "Experimental study on two full scale Iranian viscous dampers", Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Steel & Structures, Tehran, Iran, December.
  18. Mousavi, S.A. and Ghorbani-Tanha, A.K. (2012), "Optimum placement and characteristics of velocity-dependent dampers under seismic excitation", Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib., 11(3), 403-414. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11803-012-0145-x.
  19. SAP2000 (2015), Structural Analysis Program, Ver. 17.3, Computers and Structures Inc, CA.
  20. Soong, T.T. and Dargush, G.F. (1997), Passive Energy Dissipation Systems in Structural Engineering, Wiley, Chichester.
  21. Seleemah, A. and Constantinou, M. (1997), "Investigation of seismic response of buildings with linear and nonlinear fluid viscous dampers", Technical Report NCEER-97-0004; National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, State Univ. of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, N.Y, USA.
  22. Taylor Devices Inc (2002), Seismic Protection with Fluid Viscous Dampers for the Torre Mayor, a 57-Story Office Tower in Mexico City, Mexico. https://www.taylordevices.com/custom/pdf/tech-papers/71-SeismicProtectionwithFVD.pdf.
  23. Weng, D.G., Zhang, C., Lu, X.L. and Zhang, S.M. (2012), "A simplified design procedure for seismic retrofit of earthquakedamaged RC frames with viscous dampers", Struct. Eng. Mech., 44(5), 611-631. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2012.44.5.611.
  24. Yamamoto, M., Minewaki, S., Nakahara, M. and Tsuyuki, Y. (2016), "Concept and performance testing of a high-capacity oil damper comprising multiple damper units", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 45, 1919-1933. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2728.
  25. Zahrai, S.M. and Mousavi, S.A. (2012), "Suitable energy dissipation device for private typical buildings with poor seismic performance", J. Seismol. Earthq. Eng., 14(2), 131-143. https://doi.org/10.22060/ceej.2017.11416.5045.
  26. Zahrai, S.M., Moradi, A. and Moradi, M. (2015), "Using friction dampers in retrofitting a steel structure with masonry infill panels", Steel Compos. Struct., 19(2), 309-325. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/scs.2015.19.2.309.
  27. Zhang, R., Weng, H.H.D., Zhou, H. and Ding, S. (2012), "Theoretical analysis and experimental research on togglebrace-damper system considering different installation modes", Scientia Iranica, 19(6), 1379-1390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scient.2012.10.011.