Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia

World Association for Triple Helix and Future Strategy Studies (세계트리플헬릭스미래전략학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Institutional Arrangement and Policy Context Underlying Sustainability Actions in the U.S.: Lessons for Asian Regions

  • Hwang, Joungyoon (Department of Public Administration at Yonsei University) ;
  • Song, Minsun (Department of Political Science, Valdosta State University) ;
  • Cho, Seong (Center for Disaster & Safety Research at Chungnam Institute)
  • Published : 2020.07.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This paper examines the actions and the factors driving those actions to reduce energy consumption and enhance energy efficiency taken by United States cities. While not much empirical evidence is available on why governments pursue practical sustainability actions, we attempt to shed more light on this important topic by empirically identifying factors that contribute to concrete actions toward sustainability policies. We adopt political market theory as a basic theoretical framework with policy-making applied to city energy consumption. Using the 2010 ICMA (local government sustainability policies and program) data, this study expands the focus of analyses to evaluate the effect of the form of government on energy consumption and energy efficiency by using multiple regression analysis. The findings show that at the city level, the mayor-council form of government are negatively associated with governments' efforts to reduce energy consumption. However, cities with at-large elections and municipal ownership are more likely to adopt sustainability actions. We also find that a large-scale economy has significant effects on the effort to reduce city energy consumption and improve energy efficiency. This shows that environmental policies are directly connected to locally relevant affairs, including housing, energy use, green transportation, and water. Thus, local level administrators could take an executive role to protect the environment, encourage the development of alternative energy, and reduce the use of fossil fuel and coal energy. These efforts can lead to important environmental ramifications and relevant actions by municipal governments.

Keywords

References

  1. Bae, J., & Feiock, R. (2013). Forms of Government and Climate Change Policies in US Cities. Urban Studies, 50(4), 776-788. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098012450481
  2. Bailey, C., & Pomeroy, C. (1996). Resource dependency and development options in coastal Southeast Asia. Society and Natural Resources, 9, 191-199. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941929609380964
  3. Brundtland, G. H., Khalid, M., Agnelli, S., Al-Athel, S., & Chidzero, B. (1987). Our common future. New York: United Nations General Assembly.
  4. Campos, P. A., & Reich, M. R. (2019). Political analysis for health policy implementation. Health Systems & Reform, 5(3), 224-235. https://doi.org/10.1080/23288604.2019.1625251
  5. Clark, W. C., & Dickson, N. M. (2003). Science and Technology for Sustainable Development Special Feature: Sustainability Science: The Emerging Research Program. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100 (14), 8059-8061. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1231333100
  6. Clingermayer, J., & Richard Feiock. 2001. Institutional Constraints and Policy Choice: An Explanation of Local Governance. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  7. Cole, M. (1998). Quasi-Government in Britain: The Origins, Persistence and Implications of the Term 'Quango'. Public Policy and Administration, 13(1), 65-78. https://doi.org/10.1177/095207679801300105
  8. Conroy, M. M., & Al-Azad Iqbal. (2009). Adoption of Sustainability Initiatives in Indiana, Kentucky, and Ohio. Local Environment, 14(2), 109-125. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549830802521428
  9. DeSantis, V. S., & Renner, T. (1994). The Impact of Political Structures on Public Policies in American Counties. Public Administration Review, 54 (3), 291-295. https://doi.org/10.2307/976734
  10. Deng, W., Yang, T., Tang, L., & Tang, Y. T. (2018). Barriers and policy recommendations for developing green buildings from local government perspective: a case study of Ningbo China. Intelligent Buildings International, 10(2), 61-77. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508975.2016.1248342
  11. Dulal, H. B., Dulal, R., & Yadav, P. K. (2015). Delivering green economy in Asia: The role of fiscal instruments. Futures, 73, 61-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2015.08.002
  12. Eggertsson, T. (1990). The role of transaction costs and property rights in economic analysis. European Economic Review, 34(2-3), 450-457. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(90)90118-I
  13. Epstein, D., & O'Halloran, S. (1999). Delegating powers: A Transaction cost politics approach to policy making under separate powers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press.
  14. Feiock, R. C., & Bae, J. (2011). Politics, Institutions, and Entrepreneurship: City Decisions to Inventory Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Carbon Management, 2(4), 443-453. https://doi.org/10.4155/cmt.11.37
  15. Feiock, R. C. (2006). A political market explanation for policy change. Florida State University program in local governance, Tallahassee FL (http://localgov.fsu.edu/publication_files/Policy%20Change_RF.pdf).
  16. Feiock, R. C., & Francis, N. (2010). Explaining the Adoption of Climate Change Policies in Local Government. Paper presented at the Midwest Political Science Association's Annual Meeting. Chicago, April, 22-25.
  17. Feiock, R. C. (2002). A Quasi-Market Framework for Local Economic Development Competition. Journal of Urban Affairs, 24(2), 132-142. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9906.00118
  18. Feiock, R. C., Krause, R. M., & Hawkins, C. V. (2017). The Impact of Administrative Structure on the Ability of City Governments to Overcome Functional Collective Action Dilemmas: A Climate and Energy Perspective. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 27(4), 615-628. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mux021
  19. Feiock, R. C., Tarares, & Lubell. (2008). Policy Instrument Choices for Growth Management and Land Use Regulation. The Policy Studies Journal, 36(3), 461-480. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00277.x
  20. Fiorino, D. J. (2010). Sustainability as a Conceptual Focus for Public Administration. Public Administration Review, December special issue, s78-s88.
  21. Francis, N., & Feiock, R. C. (2010). A Guide for Local Government Executives on Energy Efficiency and Sustainability. IBM Center for the Business of Government.
  22. Frederickson, H. G., & Johnson, G. A. (2001). The Adopted American City: A Study of Institutional Dynamics. Urban Affairs Reviews, 26, 872-884. https://doi.org/10.1177/10780870122185127
  23. Frederickson, H. G., Johnson, G. A., & Wood, C. (2004). The Adopted City: Institutional Dynamics and Structural Change. Armonk, NY: M.E Sharpe.
  24. Garmendia, E., & Stagl, S. (2010). Public participation for sustainability and social learning: Concepts and lessons from three case studies in Europe. Ecological economics, 69(8), 1712-1722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.03.027
  25. Hardin, G. (1968). The Tragedy of the Commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243-1248. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.162.3859.1243
  26. Hawkins, C. V. (2011). Smart growth policy choice: A resource dependency and local governance explanation. Policy Studies Journal, 39(4), 679-707. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00427.x
  27. Homsy, G. C. (2016). Powering sustainability: Municipal utilities and local government policymaking. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 34(6), 1076-1094. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774X15596530
  28. Hwang, J. T. (2017). Changing South Korean water policy after political and economic liberalisation. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 47(2), 225-246. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2016.1266014
  29. Jackson, J. E., & Kingdon, J. W. (1992). Ideology, interest group scores, and legislative votes. American Journal of Political Science, 36(3), 805-823. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111592
  30. Kates, R. W., Clark, W. C., Corell, R., Hall, J. M., Jaeger, C. C., Lowe, I., et al. 2001. Environment and development: Sustainability science. Science, 292 (5517), p.641-642. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1059386
  31. Kearney, Richard C. 2005. Reinventing Government and Battling Budget Crisis: Manager and Municipal Government Actions in 2003. Municipal Yearbook 2005, p. 27-32.
  32. Keohane, N. O., Revesz, R., & Stavins, R. N. (1998). The choice of regulatory instruments in environmental policy. Harvard Environmental Law Review, 22(2), 313-368.
  33. Kosar, K. R. (2011). Quasi Government: Hybrid Organizations with Both Government and Private Sector Legal Characteristics. DIANE Publishing.
  34. Krause, R. M., Feiock, R. C., & Hawkins, C. V. (2014). The administrative organization of sustainability within local government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(1), 113-127. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muu032
  35. Laurian, L., Walker, M., & Crawford, J. (2017). Implementing Environmental Sustainability in Local Government: The Impacts of Framing, Agency Culture, and Structure in US Cities and Counties. International Journal of Public Administration, 40(3), 270-283. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2015.1107738
  36. Lewis, P., & Neiman, M. (2002). Cities under Pressure: Local Growth Controls and Residential Development Policy. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
  37. Lineberry, R. L., & Fowler, E. P. (1967). Reformism and Public Policy in American Cities. American Political Science Review, 61, 701-715. https://doi.org/10.2307/1976089
  38. Lubell, Feiock, & Handy. (2009). City Adoption of Environmentally Sustainable Policies in California's Central Valley. Journal of the American Planning Association, 75(3), 293-308. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360902952295
  39. Lubell, Feiock, & Ramirez. (2005). Political Institutions and Conservation by Local Governments. Urban Affairs Reviews, 40(6), 706-729. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087404274137
  40. Lubell, Feiock, & Ramirez. 2009. Local Institutions and the Politics of Urban Growth. American Journal of Political Science, 53(3), 649-665. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00392.x
  41. Marcuse, P. (1998). Sustainability is not enough. Environment and urbanization, 10(2), 103-112. https://doi.org/10.1177/095624789801000201
  42. Maser, S. M. (1998). Constitutions as Relational Contracts: Explaining Procedural Safeguards in Municipal Charters. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8(4), 527-64. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024395
  43. Mead, J., & Warren, K. (2016). Quasi-Governmental Organizations at the Local Level: Publicly-Appointed Directors Leading Nonprofit Organizations. In Nonprofit Policy Forum, 7(3), 289-309.
  44. Moe, T. M. (1990). Political Institutions: The Neglected Side of the Story. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization. 6, 213-253. https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/6.special_issue.213
  45. Mulder, P., & van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. (2001). Evolutionary Economic Theories of Sustainable Development. Growth and Change, 32 (1), 110-134. https://doi.org/10.1111/0017-4815.00152
  46. Navarro, P. & Carson, R. (1991). Growth Controls: Policy Analysis for the Second Generation. Policy Science, 24, 127-152. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138057
  47. Neiman, M., & Loveridge, R. (1981). Environmentalism and Local Growth Control: A Prone into the Class Bias Thesis. Environment and Behavior, 13, 759-772. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916581136007
  48. Ng, T. H., & Tao, J. Y. (2016). Bond financing for renewable energy in Asia. Energy Policy, 95, 509-517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.03.015
  49. OECD. (2012). Environmental Outlook to 2050. OECD Publishing: Paris.
  50. Porter, D. R. (2002). Making smart growth work. Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute.
  51. Portney, K. E. (2003). Taking sustainable cities seriously: Economic development, the environment, and quality of life in American cities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  52. Portney, K. E. (2005). Civic Engagement and Sustainable Cities in the U.S. Public Administration Review, 65(5), 579-591. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00485.x
  53. Portney, K. E. (2015). Sustainability. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  54. Sharp, Elaine B., Dorothy M. Daley and Michael S. Lynch. 2010. Understanding Local Adoption and Implementation of Climate Change Mitigation Policy. Paper presented at the Midwest Political Science Association's annual meeting, Chicago, IL, April 22-25.
  55. Svara, J. H., & Nelson, K. L. (2008). Taking stock of the council-manager form at 100. Public Management, 90(7), 6-14.
  56. Svara, J. H., Watt, T. C., & Jang, H. S. (2013). How are US cities doing sustainability? Who is getting on the sustainability train, and why? Cityscape, 9-44.
  57. Svara, J., Watt, T., & Takai, K. (2014). Local governments, social equity, and sustainable communities: advancing social equity goals to achieve sustainability. International City/County Management Association and Arizona State University. Accessed September 24, 2019: https://icma.org/sites/default/files/306328_FINAL%20REPORT%20Advancing%20Social%20Equity.pdf
  58. Tavares, A. F., & da Cruz, N. F. (2017). Explaining the transparency of local government websites through a political market framework. Government Information Quarterly, 101249. ISSN 0740-624X, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.08.005.
  59. Tiebout, C. (1956). A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64, 416-24. https://doi.org/10.1086/257839
  60. Tregoning, H., Agyeman, J., & Shenot, C. (2002). Sprawl, smart growth and sustainability. Local Environment, 7(4), 341-347. https://doi.org/10.1080/1354983022000027464
  61. Vita, G., Lundström, J. R., Hertwich, E. G., Quist, J., Ivanova, D., Stadler, K., & Wood, R. (2019). The environmental impact of green consumption and sufficiency lifestyles scenarios in Europe: connecting local sustainability visions to global consequences. Ecological economics, 164, 106322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.05.002
  62. Wang, X. H., Liu, C., & Hawkins, C. V. (2017). Local government strategies for financing energy efficiency initiatives. The American Review of Public Administration, 47(6), 672-686. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074015619483
  63. Weiland, S. (2010). Sustainability transitions in transition countries: forest policy reforms in South-eastern Europe. Environmental Policy and Governance, 20(6), 397-407. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.558
  64. Wheeler, S. M., & Beatley, T. (Eds.) (2004). The sustainable urban development reader. New York: Routledge.
  65. Whitehead, M. (2012). The sustainable city: an obituary? On the future form and prospects of sustainable urbanism. The future of sustainable cities. Radical reflections, 29-46.
  66. Wang, X. H., Hawkins, C. V., Lebredo, N., & Berman, E. M. (2012). Capacity to Sustain Sustainability: A Study of U.S. Cities. Public Administration Review, 72(6), 841-853. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02566.x
  67. Yi, H., Matkin, D., & Feiock, R. C. (2011). Incentivizing Energy Efficiency: Explaining Local Commitment to Energy Efficiency in Cities with Municipal-Owned Utilities. In APSA 2011 Annual Meeting Paper.
  68. Zhang, J., Cho, H., & Knizley, A. (2016). Evaluation of financial incentives for combined heat and power (CHP) systems in US regions. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 59, 738-762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.012
  69. Zeeering, E. S. (2009). What does sustainability mean to city officials? Urban Affairs Review, 45(2), 247-273. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087409337297