Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia

World Association for Triple Helix and Future Strategy Studies (세계트리플헬릭스미래전략학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Nationalizing Transnationalism: A Comparative Study of the "Comfort Women" Social Movement in China, Taiwan, and South Korea

  • Published : 2020.07.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Most literature on the "comfort women" social movement focuses on the case of Korea. These works tend to transpose the meanings generated by South Korean organizations onto the transnational network, assuming certain homogeneity of repertoires and identities among the different social actors that comprise this network. Even though there is some degree of consensus about demands, repertoires, and advocacy strategies at the international level, does this same uniformity exist at the national level? In each country, what similarities and differences are present in the laboratories of ideas, relationships, and identities of social actors in the network? Symbolically and politically, do they challenge their respective societies in the same way? This article compares this social movement in South Korea, China, and Taiwan. My main argument is that the constitutive base for this transnational network is the domestic actions of these organizations. It is in the domestic sphere that these social actors reinforce their agendas, reinvent their repertoires, transform their identities, and expand their submerged networks, allowing national movements to retain their latency and autonomy. Following Melucci's relational approach to the study of social movements, this research is based on a qualitative analysis of institutional documents, participant observation, and open-ended interviews with members of the main social actors.

Keywords

References

  1. Bob, C. (2005). The Making of Rebellion: Insurgents, Media and International Activism. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  2. Chou, C. (2003). An Emerging Transnational Movement in Women's Human Rights: Campaign of Nongovernmental Organizations on Comfort Women. Journal of Economic & Social Research 5, 1, 153-181.
  3. Della Porta, D. & Tarrow, S. (2005). Transnational Protest and Global Activism. Lanham: Rowman&Littlefield Publishers
  4. Hayashi, H. (2008). Disputes in Japan over the Japanese Military "Comfort Women" System and Its Perception in History. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 617, 123-132 https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716208314191
  5. He, Y. (2007). Remembering and Forgetting the War: Elite Mythmaking, Mass Reaction, and Sino-Japanese Relations, 1950-2006. History and Memory 19, 2, 43-74. https://doi.org/10.2979/HIS.2007.19.2.43
  6. Ku, Y. (2015). National Interest or Transnational Alliances? Japanese Policy on the Comfort Women Issue. Journal of East Asian Studies, 15, 243-269. https://doi.org/10.1017/S159824080000936X
  7. Mendoza, K. (2015). Freeing the 'Slaves of Destiny': The Lolas of the Filipino Comfort Women Movement. Cultural Dynamics 15, 3, 247-266. https://doi.org/10.1177/09213740030153002
  8. Mitsui, H. (2007). The Resignification of the Comfort Women Through NGO Trials. In Rethinking Historical Injustice and Reconciliation in Northeast Asia, Giwook S., Soonwon P. & Danqing Y. New York: Routledge, 36-54.
  9. Lee, Y. (2015). Toward Translocal Solidarities: The Comfort Women Issue and the Spatial Politics of Resistance. Localities, 5, 159-169. https://doi.org/10.15299/local.2015.11.5.159
  10. Melucci, A. (1989). Nomads of the Present: Social Movements and Individual Need in Contemporary Society. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
  11. Piper, N. (2001). Transnational Women's Activism in Japan and Korea: The Unresolved Issue of Military Sexual Slavery. Global Networks 1, 2, 155-170. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0374.00010
  12. Qiu, P., Su Z. & Chen, L. (2013). Chinese Comfort Women: Testimonies from Imperial Japan's Sex Slaves. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  13. Sikkink, K. & Keck, M. (1998). Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  14. Soh, S. (1996). The Korean "Comfort Women": Movement for Redress. Asian Survey 36, 12, 1226-1240. https://doi.org/10.2307/2645577
  15. Soh, S. (2003). Japan's National/Asian Women's Fund for Comfort Women. Pacific Affairs 76, 2, 209-233.
  16. Soh, S. (2008). The comfort women: sexual violence and postcolonial memory in Korea and Japan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  17. Tarrow, Sidney. (1994). Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentions Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  18. Tarrow, Sidney. (2005). The New Transnational Activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  19. Terazawa, Y. (2006). The Transnational Campaign for Redress for Wartime Rape by the Japanese Military: Cases for Survivors in Shanxi Province, National Women's Studies Association Journal, 18, 3, 137-138.
  20. Tsutsui, K. (2006). Redressing Past HumanRights Violations: Global Dimension of Contemporary Social Movements. Social Forces 85, 1, 331-354. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2006.0145

Cited by

  1. Guest Editorial: The Third Round of Migrant Incorporation in East Asia: An Introduction to the Special Issue on Friends and Foes of Multicultural East Asia vol.19, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.17477/jcea.2020.19.2.001