DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Dynamic interaction effects of buried structures on seismic response of surface structures

  • Sisman, Rafet (Department of Civil Engineering, Yildiz Technical University, Davutpasa Campus) ;
  • Ayvaz, Yusuf (Department of Civil Engineering, Yildiz Technical University, Davutpasa Campus)
  • Received : 2020.03.25
  • Accepted : 2020.06.10
  • Published : 2020.07.25

Abstract

This study presents an investigation of the dynamic interactions between a surface structure lying on two different soil deposits and a square-shaped buried structure embedded in the soil. To this end, a large number of numerical models are generated by using a well-known Finite Element Method software, i.e., OpenSEES. The interaction phenomenon is assumed to be affected by six different parameters. In the parametric study, these parameters are assumed to have various values in accordance with the engineering practices. A total of 1620 possible combinations of the parameter values are addressed in this study. 30 different numerical models are also generated as the 'free-field cases' to set a reference. The surface structure drift and acceleration amplifications are used as a measure to evaluate the dynamic interactions. The response (i.e., drifts and accelerations) amplifications are calculated as the ratio of the maximum surface structure response in any 'case' to the maximum surface structure response in corresponding free-field case. Variation of the response amplifications with any of the investigated parameters is addressed in this paper. The results obtained from the numerical analyses clearly reveal that the presence of a buried structure in the vicinity of a surface structure can cause both amplification and de-amplification of the surface structure responses, depending on the case parameters.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank the reviewers for their valuable and constructive comments which improved the quality of the paper.

References

  1. Abuhajar, O., El Naggar, H. and Newson, T. (2002), "Effects of underground structures on amplification of seismic motion for sand with varying density", 2011 Pan-Am CGS Geotechnical Conference, Ontario, Canada, October.
  2. Abuhajar, O., El Naggar, H. and Newson, T. (2015), "Experimental and numerical investigations of the effect of buried box culverts on earthquake excitation", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 79, 130-148, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.07.015.
  3. Ahmad, N., Ali, Q., Ashraf, M., Alam, B. and Naeem, A. (2012), "Seismic vulnerability of the Himalayan half-dressed rubble stone masonry structures, experimental and analytical studies", Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 12(11), 3441-3454, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-3441-2012.
  4. Ahmad, N., Shahzad, A., Rizwan, M., Khan, A.N., Ali, S.M., Ashraf, M., Naseer, A., Ali, Q. and Alam, B. (2017), "Seismic performance assessment of non-compliant SMRF reinforced concrete frame: Shake-table test study", J. Earthq. Eng., 23(3), 444-462, https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2017.1326426.
  5. Alielahi, H. and Adampira, M. (2016a), "Site-specific response spectra for seismic motions in half-plane with shallow cavities", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 80, 163-167, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.10.003.
  6. Alielahi, H. and Adampira, M. (2016b), "Effect of twin-parallel tunnels on seismic ground response due to vertically in-plane waves", Int. J. Rock Mech. Mining Sci., 85, 67-83, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2016.03.010.
  7. Alielahi, H., Kamalian, M. and Adampira, M. (2015), "Seismic ground amplification by unlined tunnels subjected to vertically propagating SV and P waves using BEM", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 71, 63-79, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.01.007.
  8. Alielahi, H., Kamalian, M. and Adampira, M. (2016), "A BEM investigation on the influence of underground cavities on the seismic response of canyons", Acta Geotechnica, 11(2), 391-413, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-015-0387-7.
  9. Baziar, M.H., Moghadam, M.R., Choo, Y.W. and Kim, D. (2016), "Tunnel flexibility effect on the ground surface acceleration response", Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib., 15(3), 457-476, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-016-0336-y.
  10. Baziar, M.H., Moghadam, M.R., Kim, D.S. and Choo, Y. W. (2014), "Effect of underground tunnel on the ground surface acceleration", Tunnel. Underground Space Technol., 44, 10-22, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2014.07.004.
  11. Besharat, V., Davoodi, M. and Jafari, M.K. (2012), "Effect of underground structures on free-field ground motion during earthquakes", The 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisboa, Portugal, September.
  12. Courant, R., Friedrichs, K. and Lewy, H. (1967), "On the partial difference equations of mathematical physics", IBM J., 3, 215-234, https://doi.org/10.1147/rd.112.0215.
  13. Doyle, J.F. (1989), "Wave Propagation in Structures: An FFT-Based Spectral Analysis Methodology", Springer, New York, NY, U.S.A.
  14. Franza, A., Marshall, A., M. Haji, T., Abdelatif, A.O., Carbonari, S. and Morici, M. (2017), "A simplified elastic analysis of tunnel-piled structure interaction", Tunnel. Underground Space Technol., 61, 104-121, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2016.09.008.
  15. Liang, J., Zhang, J. and Ba, Z. (2012), "The effect of underground cavities on design seismic ground motion", The 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisboa, Portugal, September.
  16. Jafarnia, M. and Varzaghani, M.I. (2016), "Effect of near field earthquake on the monuments adjacent to underground tunnels using hybrid FEA-ANN technique", Earthq. Struct., 10(4), 757-768, http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.10.4.757.
  17. Joyner, W.B. and Chen, A.T.F. (1975), "Calculation of nonlinear ground response in earthquakes", Bull. Seismol. Soc. Ame., 65(5), 1315-1336.
  18. Lee, C.J., Jeon, Y.J., Kim, S.H. and Park, I.J. (2016), "The influence of tunnelling on the behaviour of pre-existing piled foundations in weathered soil", Geomech. Eng, 11(4), 553-570, http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/gae.2016.11.4.553.
  19. Lysmer, J. and Kuhlemeyer, R.L. (1969), "Finite dynamic model for infinite media", J. Eng. Mech. Div., 95, 859-878. https://doi.org/10.1061/JMCEA3.0001144
  20. McKenna, F., Scott, M.H. and Fenves, G.L. (2010), "Nonlinear Finite-Element analysis software architecture using object composition", J. Comput. Civil Eng., 24(1), 95-107, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000002.
  21. Pitilakis, K., Tsinidis, G., Leanza, A. and Maugeri, M. (2014), "Seismic behaviour of circular tunnels accounting for above ground structures interaction effects", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 67, 1-15, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.08.009.
  22. Rizwan, M., Ahmad, N. and Khan, A.N. (2019), "Seismic performance of RC frame having low strength concrete: Experimental and numerical studies", Earthq. Struct., 17(1), 75-89, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2019.17.1.075.
  23. Rostami, A., Ziarati, M.A., Shahi, B. and Jahani, S. (2016), "Evaluation of seismic behavior and Earth's surface acceleration, by interaction of tunnels with different shapes and different types of soils", Open J. Civil Eng., 6, 242-253, http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojce.2016.62022.
  24. Safak, E. (1999), "Wave-propagation formulation of seismic response of multistory buildings", J. Struct. Eng., 125(4), 426-437, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1999)125:4(426).
  25. Sgarlato, G., Lombardo, G. and Rigano, R. (2011), "Evaluation of seismic site response nearby underground cavities using earthquake and ambient noise recordings: A case study in Catania area, Italy", Eng. Geology, 122(3-4), 281-291, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2011.06.002.
  26. Sica, S., Russo, A.D., Rotili, F. and Simonelli, A.L. (2014), "Ground motion amplification due to shallow cavities in nonlinear soils", 71, 1913-1935, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0989-z.
  27. Sisman, R. and Ayvaz, Y. (2019a), "Comparative modelling of soil - underground structure - surface structure interactions", International Civil Engineering and Architecture Conference, Trabzon, Turkey, April.
  28. Sisman, R. and Ayvaz, Y. (2019b), "Effect of mass ratio on racking ratios of underground structures under seismic loading", International Civil Engineering and Architecture Conference, Trabzon, Turkey, April.
  29. Smerzini, C., Aviles, J., Paolucci, R. and Sanchez-Sesma, F. J. (2009), "Effect of underground cavities on surface earthquake ground motion under SH wave propagation", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 38(12), 1441-1460, https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.912.
  30. Smerzini, C., Avile's, J., Sa'nchez-Sesma, F.J. Paolucci, R., Santini, A. and Moraci, N. (2008), "Analytical solutions for the seismic response of underground structures under SH wave propagation", AIP Conference Proceedings, Reggio Calabria, Italy, July.
  31. Tsinidis, G. (2017), "Response characteristics of rectangular tunnels in soft soil subjected to transversal ground shaking", Tunnel.Underground Space Technol., 62, 1-22, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2016.11.003.
  32. Tsinidis, G. (2018), "Response of urban single and twin circular tunnels subjected to transversal ground seismic shaking", Tunnel. Underground Space Technol., 76, 177-193, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2018.03.016.
  33. Tsinidis, G. and Pitilakis, K. (2018), "Improved R-F relations for the transversal seismic analysis of rectangular tunnels", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 107, 48-65, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.01.004.
  34. PEER Ground Motion Database - PEER Center (2019), PEER Ground Motion Database, UC Berkeley, Californina, USA. https://ngawest2.berkeley.edu/.
  35. OpenSeesWiki (2019), "OpenSeesWiki", UC Berkeley, Californina, USA. http://opensees.berkeley.edu/wiki/index.php/PressureIndependMultiYield_Material.
  36. TBEC (2018), "Turkish building earthquake code", Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency; Ankara, Turkey.
  37. Uang, C.M. and Maarouf, A. (1994), "Deflection amplification factor for seismic design provisions", J. Struct. Eng., 120(8), 2423-2436, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)07339445(1994)120:8(2423).
  38. Wang, G., Yuan, M., Miao, Y., Wu, J. and Wang, Y. (2018), "Experimental study on seismic response of underground tunnel-soil-surface structure interaction system", Tunnel. Underground Space Technol., 76, 145-159, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2018.03.015.
  39. Wang, H., Lou, M., Chen, X. and Zhai, Y. (2013), "Structure-soil-structure interaction between underground structure and ground structure", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 54, 31-38, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.07.015.
  40. Wang, H., Lou, M. and Zhang, R. (2017), "Influence of presence of adjacent surface structure on seismic response of underground structure", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 100, 131-143, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.05.031.
  41. Xu, Z., Du, X., Xu, C., Hao, H., Bi, K. and Jiang, J. (2019), "Numerical research on seismic response characteristics of shallow buried rectangular underground structure", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 116, 242-252, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.10.030.
  42. Yiouta-Mitra, P., Kouretzis, G., Bouckovalas, G. and Sofianos, A. (2007), "Effect of underground structures in earthquake resistant design of surface structures", Geo-Denver 2007: New Peaks in Geotechnics, 1-10, Denver, Colorado, USA, February.
  43. Zidan, A.F. and Ramadan, O.M. (2018), "A hybrid MC-HS model for 3D analysis of tunnelling under piled structures", Geomech. Eng., 14(5), 479-489. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2018.14.5.479.