DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

기술·가정과 교사의 학교교육과정 편성 참여와 고교학점제에 대한 인식

Technology and Home Economics Teachers' Perception of Participation in School Curriculum Organization and High School Credit System

  • Park, Mi Jeong (Dept. of Home Economics Education, Korea National University of Education) ;
  • Lim, Yunjin (Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation(KICE)) ;
  • Kwon, Yoojin (Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation(KICE)) ;
  • Lee, Kwangjae (Il-san East Highschool)
  • 투고 : 2020.01.28
  • 심사 : 2020.03.11
  • 발행 : 2020.03.31

초록

본 연구는 중등학교 기술·가정과 교사의 학교교육과정 편성 참여와 고교학점제에 대한 인식을 알아보는데 목적이 있다. 이를 위해 유의표집 방법으로 전국의 중등 기술·가정과 교사 345명의 설문 자료를 SPSS 24를 활용하여 기술통계, t검정, F검증을 통해 분석하였으며, 연구 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 기술·가정과 교사들은 현재 단위 학교에서 기술·가정과 교육과정 편성 시수가 부족하고(61.1%), 교사의 수도 부족(53%)하다고 인식하고, 학교교육과정 편성에 대부분 참여하고 있었으며(62.0%), 향후 학교교육과정 편성 과정에 참여하겠다는 의지도 매우 높았다(4.47, 89.9%). 둘째, 기술·가정과 교사들은 고교학점제 도입에 대해 보통 이상으로 알고 있었고(3.34) 긍정적인 인식(37.7%)보다 부정적인 인식(52.8%)이 많았다. 고교학점제 도입으로 학생들의 진로 선택(3.88)과 전공 분야의 전문내용 심화(3.81)를 긍정적인 영향으로 인식한 반면, 비입시 과목으로 인한 선택 감소(3.90)와 이에 따른 교사 전보의 어려움(3.57) 등을 부정적인 영향으로 인식하고 있었다. 셋째, 기술·가정과 교사들은 고교학점제 도입에 안정적으로 대응하기 위하여 진로선택과목의 조정(4.51), 선택과목의 교수·학습 자료 개발 및 보급(4.46), 기술과 가정의 분리(4.45), 평가방법 및 적용에 대한 연수 제공(4.44) 등을 중요하게 인식하고 있었다. 본 연구는 기술·가정 교과가 차기 교육과정 개정과 고교학점제에 지혜롭게 대비할 수 있는 기초 자료와 고등학교 기술·가정교육과정 편제에 대한 논의의 단초를 마련한 것에 의의가 있다.

The purpose of this study was to examine the secondary school technology and home economics teachers' perception of the school curriculum organization and high school credit system. For this purpose, the questionnaire data of 345 secondary technology and home economics teachers nationwide were analyzed through descriptive statistics, t-test, and F-test with SPSS 24. The research results were as follows. First, technology and home economics teachers recognized that current schools lacked the time to organize technology and home economics curriculum (61.1%) and the number of teachers (53%). Most of them have participated (62.0%) and were very willing to participate in the school curriculum organization (4.47, 89.9%). Second, technology and home economics teachers were aware of the high school credit system more than the average (3.34), and more negative (52.8%) than positive (37.7%). As a positive influence, students recognized career choices (3.88) and deepened professional content in their major fields (3.81). On the other hand, the negative impact was the decrease in choice due to non-entry subjects (3.90) and the difficulty in moving teachers to school (3.57). Third, in order to stably respond to the introduction of high school credit system, technology and home economics teachers recognized the importance of coordinating career elective courses (4.51), developing and disseminating teaching and learning materials for elective courses (4.46), separating technology and home economics (4.45), and providing training on evaluation methods and applications (4.44). This study would be useful to provide the basic information and data for the future development of technology and home economics curriculum at the national level based on high school credit system.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Choi, J. H. (2019). Teachers' perceptions on the integration of literature and science and the high school credit system. Journal of Education & Culture, 25(1), 421-447. https://doi.org/10.24159/joec.2019.25.1.421
  2. Gu, J. E., & Namgung, J. Y. (2011). Primary research for the introduction of credit-based curriculum system. Seoul: KEDI.
  3. Han, H. C. (2012). A study on the curriculum organization and implementation of subject-specialized high school. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 30(1), 99-124. https://doi.org/10.15708/kscs.30.1.201203.005
  4. Hong, H. J. (2018). Understanding and practical design of high school credit system. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 18(1), 699-724. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2018.18.1.699
  5. Kim, J. S., Lee, K. W., Cho, B. K., Lee, M. H., & Lim, Y. N. (2018). A study on restructuring high school curriculum to adopt the credit system (Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation RRC 2018-8). Jincheon, Chungbuk: KICE.
  6. Kim, M. H. (2010). A study on the school curriculum construction and implementation in primary and secondary school. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 10(3), 47-72.
  7. Korean Federation of Teachers' Associations. (2017, November 27). 교육부의 '고교학점제 추진 방향 및 연구학교 운영계획(안)' 발표에 대한 교총 입장 [Position of KFTA on the Ministry of Education's 'implementation direction of high school credit system and operation plan of research schools']. Retrieved from http://www.jnfta.or.kr/board/bodo?per_page=18&mode=read&write_id=532
  8. Kwon, S. H., & Kim, D. K. (2012). The legal characters of organization and implementation of school curriculum. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 12(3), 1-21.
  9. Lee, K. W. (2018). Teacher's perceptions and needs on implement of high school credit system. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 18(12), 543-567. doi:10.22251/jlcci.2018.18.12.54
  10. Lee, K. W., Kim, J. S., Lee, K. H., Han, H. C., Kim, K. J., & Hyung, I. Y. (2017). 지능정보사회 대응을 위한 중장기 고교 교육과정 방향 탐색 연구-학습자 중심 고교학점제 실행 방향 및 과제 [A study on the direction of high school curriculum for the intelligence information society: Direction and tasks of student-centered high school credit system]. (Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation CRC 2017-9), Jincheon, Chungbuk: KICE.
  11. Lee, M. S. (2014). The perceptions of educational specialists about the competencies of teachers and principals for the organization and implementation of school curriculum. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32(4), 195-215. https://doi.org/10.15708/kscs.32.4.201412.008
  12. Lim, Y.-J. (2018). Case study of organization and operation expansion in general high school technology course. The Journal of Korean Institute of Industrial Education, 43(2), 97-113. https://doi.org/10.35140/kiiedu.2018.43.2.97
  13. Ministry of Education and Human Resources Development. (2007). A practical arts(technology and home economics) curriculum. Notification No. 2007-79 of Ministry of Education and Home Resources Development.
  14. Ministry of Education. (2017). 고교학점제 추진 방향 및 연구학교 운영 계획 [Direction of high school credit system and operation plan of research schools]. Retrieved from https://www.moe.go.kr/boardCnts/view.do?boardID=294&boardSeq=72593&lev=0&searchType=S&statusYN=C&page=1&s=moe&m=020402&opType=N
  15. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology. (2011). A practical arts(technology and home economics) curriculum. Notification No. 2011-361 of Ministry of Education, Science and Technology.
  16. Ministry of Education. (1997). A practical arts(technology and home economics) curriculum. Notification No. 1997-15 of Ministry of Education.
  17. Ministry of Education. (2015). A practical arts(technology and home economics) /information curriculum. Notification No. 2015-74 of Ministry of Education. Retrieved from http://ncic.re.kr/mobile.dwn.ogf.inventoryList.do
  18. Ministry of Education. (2018a). 2022학년도 대학입학제도 개편방안 및 고교교육 혁신방향 [2022 School admission system reorganization plan and high school education innovation direction]. Retrieved from https://www.moe.go.kr/sn3hcv/doc.html?fn=12f1f89d29c4e0b66999378c2c37dab2&rs=/upload/synap/202003/
  19. Ministry of Education. (2018b). 초.중등학교 교육과정 총론 [Introduction to elementary and secondary school curriculum]. Notification No. 2018-162 of Ministry of Education.
  20. National Curriculum Information Center. (2019). Retrieved from http://ncic.re.kr/mobile.dwn.ogf.inventoryList.do
  21. National Legal Information Center. (2018). 초.중등교육법 [Elementary and Secondary Education Act] (Act No. 15961). Retrieved from www.law.go.kr/lsInfoP.do?lsiSeq=205799&efYd=20190619#J23:0
  22. Park, M. J. (2017). Exploration on the organization of high school home economics selective curriculum for the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Family and Environment Research, 55(5), 539-553. doi:10.6115/fer.2017.039
  23. Shin, J. A. (2019). A study on the analysis of high school teachers' perception of the high school credit system. Unpublished Master's thesis, Graduate School of Korea National University of Education, Chungbuk, Korea.
  24. Shin, Y., & Kwak, Y. (2019). Analysis of realities of organization and implementation of integrated science of the 2015 revised curriculum. Journal of Science Education, 43(1), 64-78. https://doi.org/10.21796/jse.2019.43.1.64
  25. Sung, Y. K. (2019). 고교학점제의 성공적인 시행을 위한 정책 제언 Policy suggestions for successful implementation of high school credit system]. 교육개발 [Education development], 46(2). 17-19.
  26. Yu, C. W. (2018). Analysis of teacher's perception and organization on physical education elective courses. Korean Journal of Sport Science, 29(3), 591-602. https://doi.org/10.24985/KJSS.2018.29.3.591

피인용 문헌

  1. 고등학교 가정과 선택과목 개발을 위한 미국 고등학교 가정과 교육과정 사례 연구: 미국 오하이오 주(州)를 중심으로 vol.32, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.19031/jkheea.2020.12.32.4.31
  2. 고등학교 가정과 선택과목 개발을 위한 미국 고등학교 가정과 교육과정 사례 연구: 미국 오하이오 주(州)를 중심으로 vol.32, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.19031/jkheea.2020.12.32.4.31
  3. 가정실습실 공간 구축과 활용을 통한 진로 연계형 고등학교 선택 과목 운영 사례 연구 vol.32, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.19031/jkheea.2020.12.32.4.53
  4. 고교학점제 연구학교 운영 사례 분석을 통한 가정과 교육공동체의 고교학점제 준비 방안에 대한 탐색적 연구 vol.33, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.19031/jkheea.2021.6.33.2.1
  5. 가정계열 선택과목에 대한 고등학생의 요구 분석 vol.33, pp.2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.19031/jkheea.2021.6.33.2.173