The Journal of Korean Physical Therapy

  • 제32권3호
  • /
  • Pages.168-175
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 1229-0475(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-156X(eISSN)
대한물리치료학회 (The Korean Society of Physical Therapy)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Survey on the Current Status of Neonatal Physical Therapy in South Korea

  • Kim, Sung Tae (Department of Physical Therapy, Chungbuk national university hospital) ;
  • Lee, Joon-Hee (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health and Medical Science, Cheongju University)
  • 투고 : 2020.06.04
  • 심사 : 2020.06.11
  • 발행 : 2020.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate and report the current status of physical therapy (PT) performed in Korean neonatal intensive care units (NICU) to present foundational data that promotes the advances in neonatal PT in Korea. Methods: Based on the Health Insurance Review and Assessment (HIRA) data, we administered a questionnaire survey to 74 hospitals (39 tertiary and 35 general hospitals) in Korea equipped with a NICU and pediatric PT unit. We developed a 32-item questionnaire with reference to previous Korean studies. The questionnaires were distributed and retrieved via regular mail and an online system. Results: Of the 74 hospitals, 58 (78%) practiced neonatal PT and the duration of each session significantly differed according to the hospital rating. PT was given, depending on clinical symptoms, to infants who were preterm and low birth-weight (96.5%), had brain and spinal cord diseases (84.5%), had pathological tonus (94.8%), with respiratory problems (65.5%), for range of motion exercises (82.8%), for neurodevelopment approaches (72.4%), and for positioning (70.7%). Interdisciplinary meetings were held to share clinical decisionmaking in 17.2% of the hospitals surveyed and parent-participating education to ensure a family-centered approach was offered in 63.8% of the hospitals. The barriers of neonatal PT included low insurance fees, insufficient awareness of colleagues, and the severity of the patient. Conclusion: This study is the first report of the current status of neonatal PT in Korea. The findings of this study will serve as foundational data to review the current neonatal PT practice and promote further advances.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Kim S, Savage TA, Song MK et al. Nurses' roles and challenges in providing end-of-life care in neonatal intensive care units in South Korea. Appl Nurs Res. Published online 2019:50:151204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2019.151204
  2. Byrne E, Campbell SK. Physical therapy observation and assessment in the neonatal intensive care unit. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2013;33(1):39-74. https://doi.org/10.3109/01942638.2012.754827
  3. Byrne E, Garber J. Physical therapy intervention in the neonatal intensive care unit. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2013;33(1):75-110. https://doi.org/10.3109/01942638.2012.750870
  4. Shim JW, Jin HS, Bae CW. Changes in survival rate for very-low-birth-weight infants in Korea: comparison with other countries. J Korean Med Sci. 2015;30(Suppl 1):S25-S34. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2015.30.S1.S25
  5. Seaton SE, King S, Manktelow BN et al. Babies born at the threshold of viability: changes in survival and workload over 20 years. Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed. 2013;98(1):F15-F20.
  6. Healthcare Bigdata Hub. Annual statistics from 2010 to 2018 of code R62 (other lack of expected normal physiological development). Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service (HIRA). http://opendata.hira.or.kr/op/opc/olap3thDsInfo.do
  7. Limperopoulos C, Majnemer A. The role of rehabilitation specialists in Canadian NICUs: A national survey. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2002; 22(1):57-72.
  8. Sweeney JK, Heriza CB, Reilly MA et al. Practice guidelines for the physical therapist in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Pediatr Phys Ther. 1999;11(3):119-32.
  9. Sweeney JK, Heriza CB, Blanchard Y. Neonatal physical therapy. Part I: clinical competencies and neonatal intensive care unit clinical training models. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2009;21(4):296-307. https://doi.org/10.1097/PEP.0b013e3181bf75ee
  10. Allinson LG, Doyle LW, Denehy L et al. Survey of neurodevelopmental allied health teams in Australian and New Zealand neonatal nurseries: Staff profile and standardised neurobehavioural/neurological assessment. J Paediatr Child Health. 2017;53(6):578-84. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.13484
  11. Borges Nery P, Snider L, Camelo JS et al. The Role of Rehabilitation Specialists in Canadian NICUs: A 21st Century Perspective. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2019;39(1):33-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/01942638.2018.1490846
  12. Kim SM, Park SH, An SJ. Current Status of Occupational Therapy in Korean University Hospital NICUs. KSIM. 2014;2(4):19-27.
  13. Altimier L, Phillips RM. The neonatal integrative developmental care model: Seven neuroprotective core measures for family-centered developmental care. Newborn Infant Nurs Rev. 2013;13(1):9-22. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.nainr.2012.12.002
  14. Lee HY, Kang DY. Effects of Positioning Education Program through Oral Explanations or Brochures for Parents of Premature Infants with Brain Lesions and the Satisfaction Level of Physical Therapy at Discharge. J Kor Phys Ther 2017:29(5):259-64. https://doi.org/10.18857/jkpt.2017.29.5.259
  15. Walker SP, Wachs TD, Gardner JM et al. Child development: risk factors for adverse outcomes in developing countries. Lancet. 2007; 369(9556): 145-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60076-2
  16. Barbosa VM. Teamwork in the neonatal intensive care unit. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2013;33(1):5-26. https://doi.org/10.3109/01942638.2012.729556
  17. Arango P. Family-centered care. Acad Pediatr. 2011;11(2):97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2010.12.004
  18. Garber J. Oral-motor function and feeding intervention. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2013;33(1):111-38. https://doi.org/10.3109/01942638.2012.750864
  19. Goldstein LA. Family support and education. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2013;33(1):139-61. https://doi.org/10.3109/01942638.2012.754393