치위생과학회지 (Journal of dental hygiene science)

  • 제20권2호
  • /
  • Pages.118-124
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 1598-4478(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2233-7679(eISSN)
한국치위생과학회 (The Korean Society of Dental Hygiene Science)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Application of New Appliances for Management of Growing Class III Malocclusion Child: Comparazation Case Reports

  • An, So-Youn (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Wonkwang University College of Dentistry, Research Institute of Wonkwang Bone Regeneration) ;
  • Park, So-Young (Department of Dental Hygiene, Wonkwang Health Science University) ;
  • Jeon, Eun-Young (Department of Dental Hygiene, Kyungbok University) ;
  • Shim, Youn-Soo (Department of Dental Hygiene, Sunmoon University)
  • 투고 : 2020.04.01
  • 심사 : 2020.05.13
  • 발행 : 2020.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The purpose of this comparison of case reports is to introduce the results of the application of new devices for the management of growing Class III malocclusions in children. Two 8-year-old boys had a chief complaint of anterior crossbite. Anterior crossbite correction using a tandem traction bow appliance (TTBA) or a Carriere Motion 3D Class III appliance with a Transforce appliance was planned. By comparing cephalometric radiographs before and after treatment, changes in skeletal growth and incisor inclination to the Frankfort horizontal (FH) plane could be measured. Both devices increased SNA and ANB angles, N-I Pg-A, U1 to SN, and U1 to FH. Both appliances improved facial features and resolution of anterior crossbite. The TTBA and Carriere Motion 3D Class III appliance had similar effects when applied as early treatment for growing mesio-occlusions and anterior crossbite in two boys. However, long-term outcome assessments and well-designed comparative studies are still required.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Nakasima A, Ichinose M, Nakata S: Genetic and environmental factors in the development of so-called pseudo- and true mesiocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 90: 106-116, 1986. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(86)90041-7
  2. Lee SH: Diagnosis and treatment of Class III malocclusion in children. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent 34: 725-740, 2007.
  3. Kapur A, Chawla HS, Utreja A, Goyal A: Early class III occlusal tendency in children and its selective management. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 26: 107-113, 2008. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-4388.43191
  4. Campbell PM: The dilemma of Class III treatment. Early or late? Angle Orthod 53: 175-191, 1983.
  5. Toffol LD, Pavoni C, Baccetti T, Franchi L, Cozza P: Orthopedic treatment outcomes in class III malocclusion. A systematic review. Angle Orthod 78: 561-573, 2008. https://doi.org/10.2319/030207-108.1
  6. Fudalej P, Dragan M, Wedrychowska-Szulc B: Prediction of the outcome of orthodontic treatment of Class III malocclusions--a systematic review. Eur J Orthod 33: 190-197, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjq052
  7. Baik HS, Jee SH, Lee KJ, Oh TK: Treatment effects of Frankel functional regulator III in children with class III malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 125: 294-301, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.04.016
  8. Minase RA, Bhad WA, Doshi UH: Effectiveness of reverse twin block with lip pads-RME and face mask with RME in the early treatment of class III malocclusion. Prog Orthod 20: 14, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-019-0266-0
  9. Tortop T, Kaygisiz E, Gencer D, Yuksel S, Atalay Z: Modified tandem traction bow appliance compared with facemask therapy in treating Class III malocclusions. Angle Orthod 84: 642-648, 2014. https://doi.org/10.2319/080513-584.1
  10. Showkatbakhsh R, Jamilian A, Ghassemi M, Ghassemi A, Taban T, Imani Z: The effects of facemask and reverse chin cup on maxillary deficient patients. J Orthod 39: 95-101, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1179/1465312512Z.00000000011
  11. Chun YS, Jeong SG, Row J, Yang SJ: A new appliance for orthopedic correction of Class III malocclusion. J Clin Orthod 33: 705-710, 1999.
  12. Carriere L: A new Class II distalizer. J Clin Orthod 38: 224-231, 2004.
  13. Thiruvenkatachari B, Harrison JE, Worthington HV, O'Brien KD: Orthodontic treatment for prominent upper front teeth (Class II malocclusion) in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (11): CD003452, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003452.pub3
  14. Woon SC, Thiruvenkatachari B: Early orthodontic treatment for Class III malocclusion: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 151: 28-52, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.07.017
  15. Seehra J, Fleming PS, Mandall N, Dibiase AT: A comparison of two different techniques for early correction of Class III malocclusion. Angle Orthod 82: 96-101, 2012. https://doi.org/10.2319/032011-197.1
  16. Chong YH, Ive JC, Artun J: Changes following the use of protraction headgear for early correction of Class III malocclusion. Angle Orthod 66: 351-362, 1996.
  17. Kim JH, Viana MA, Graber TM, Omerza FF, BeGole EA: The effectiveness of protraction face mask therapy: a metaanalysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 115: 675-685, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0889-5406(99)70294-5
  18. Azamian Z, Shirban F: Treatment options for Class III malocclusion in growing patients with emphasis on maxillary protraction. Scientifica (Cairo) 2016: 8105163, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/8105163
  19. Husson AH, Burhan AS, Salma FB, Nawaya FR: Dentoskeletal effects of the modified tandem appliance vs the facemask appliance in the treatment of skeletal class III malocclusion: a single-center, randomized controlled trial. J Contemp Dent Pract 17: 522-529, 2016. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1883
  20. Carriere L: Nonsurgical correction of severe skeletal Class III malocclusion. J Clin Orthod 50: 216-230, 2016.