DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Psychosocial Risk Management in the Teaching Profession: A Systematic Review

  • Wischlitzki, Elisabeth (Institute and Outpatient Clinic of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine Friedrich-Alexander-Universitat Erlangen-Nurnberg (FAU)) ;
  • Amler, Nadja (Institute and Outpatient Clinic of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine Friedrich-Alexander-Universitat Erlangen-Nurnberg (FAU)) ;
  • Hiller, Julia (Institute and Outpatient Clinic of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine Friedrich-Alexander-Universitat Erlangen-Nurnberg (FAU)) ;
  • Drexler, Hans (Institute and Outpatient Clinic of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine Friedrich-Alexander-Universitat Erlangen-Nurnberg (FAU))
  • Received : 2019.09.17
  • Accepted : 2020.09.09
  • Published : 2020.12.30

Abstract

Teachers are facing various job demands with psychosocial aspects being fundamental due to the nature of the occupation. Although teachers' work is associated with different psychosocial health risks, little is known on how to identify and tackle those. Thus, a systematic literature search as per the PRISMA statement was conducted via MEDLINE (PubMed), PSYNDEX (PubPsych), and ScienceDirect. Two reviewers independently screened 2261 titles and abstracts and 169 full-texts. According to the inclusion criteria established a priori, articles from peer-reviewed journals (English or German) on psychosocial risk management in teachers were incorporated. Despite a comprehensive and sensitive search, only four publications could be identified, outlining a process to implement risk management and different assessment tools. Taken together, data presented in the articles were scarce. Recommendations for process steps and the assessment of psychosocial risks can be derived from the findings. To implement effective psychosocial risk management in the teaching profession, further research is needed, though. Effective and practicable approaches, which are accepted by the target group, should be further developed and investigated. Relevant causes of occupational strain in the teaching profession must be identified and assessed reliably. Low-threshold interventions should be implemented, and the outcome must be evaluated afterward.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to kindly thank Mrs. Karin Haji-Abbas-Zarrabi for proofreading the paper. The present work was performed in partial fulfillment of the requirements for obtaining the degree "Dr. rer. biol. hum."

References

  1. Chirico F, Heponiemi T, Pavlova M, Zaffina S, Magnavita N. Psychosocial risk prevention in a global occupational health perspective. A descriptive analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019;16(14). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16142470.
  2. European Parliament. Council Directive of 12 June 1989 on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health of workers at work: 89/391/EEC; 2008. 31.11.
  3. Leka S, Jain A, Iavicoli S, Di Tecco C. An evaluation of the policy context on psychosocial risks and mental health in the workplace in the European union: achievements, challenges, and the future. Biomed Res Int 2015;2015:213089. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/213089.
  4. Potter R, O'Keeffe V, Leka S, Webber M, Dollard M. Analytical review of the Australian policy context for work-related psychological health and psychosocial risks. Safety Sci 2019;111:37-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.09.012.
  5. EU-OSHA. Drivers and barriers for psychosocial risk management: an analysis of the findings of the European Survey of Enterprises on New and Emerging Risks (ESENER) ; report. Luxembourg: Publ. Office of the Europ. Union; 2012.
  6. EU-OSHA. Management of psychosocial risks in European workplaces - evidence from the second European survey of enterprises on new and emerging risks (ESENER-2); 2018.
  7. Leka S, Jain A, Widerszal-Bazyl M, Zolnierczyk-Zreda D, Zwetsloot G. Developing a standard for psychosocial risk management: PAS 1010. Safety Sci 2011;49(7):1047-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2011.02.003.
  8. Beck D, Berger S, Breutmann N, Fergen A, Gregersen S, Moschhauser M, et al. Empfehlungen zur Umsetzung der Gefahrdungsbeurteilung psychischer Belastung. 2nd ed.; 2016. Berlin.
  9. van Droogenbroeck F, Spruyt B. Do teachers have worse mental health?: review of the existing comparative research and results from the Belgian Health Interview Survey. Teaching Teacher Education 2015;51:88-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.06.006.
  10. Dicke T, Stebner F, Linninger C, Kunter M, Leutner D. A longitudinal study of teachers' occupational well-being: applying the job demands-resources model. J Occup Health Psychol 2017;22(3):273-85. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000070.
  11. Hargreaves A. Mixed emotions: teachers' perceptions of their interactions with students. Teaching Teacher Educ 2000;16(8):811-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00028-7.
  12. Helms-Lorenz M, Maulana R. Influencing the psychological well-being of beginning teachers across three years of teaching: self-efficacy, stress causes, job tension and job discontent. Educational Psychol 2016;36(3):569-94. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2015.1008403.
  13. Kunsting J, Neuber V, Lipowsky F. Teacher self-efficacy as a long-term predictor of instructional quality in the classroom. Eur J Psychol Educ 2016;31(3):299-322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-015-0272-7.
  14. Kyriacou C. Teacher stress: directions for future research. Educational Rev 2001;53(1):27-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131910120033628.
  15. Philipp A, Schupbach H. Longitudinal effects of emotional labour on emotional exhaustion and dedication of teachers. J Occup Health Psychol 2010;15(4):494-504. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021046.
  16. Karasek Robert A. Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: implications for job redesign. Administrative Sci Quarterly 1979;24(2):285-308.
  17. Kivimaki M, Vahtera J, Elovainio M, Virtanen M, Siegrist J. Effort-reward imbalance, procedural injustice and relational injustice as psychosocial predictors of health: complementary or redundant models? Occup Environ Med 2007;64(10):659-65. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.2006.031310.
  18. Siegrist J. Adverse health effects of high-effort/low-reward conditions. J Occup Health Psychol 1996;1(1):27-41.
  19. Kristiansen J, Lund SP, Persson R, Challi R, Lindskov JM, Nielsen PM, et al. The effects of acoustical refurbishment of classrooms on teachers' perceived noise exposure and noise-related health symptoms. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2016;89(2):341-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-015-1077-3.
  20. Johnson S, Cooper C, Cartwright S, Donald I, Taylor P, Millet C. The experience of work-related stress across occupations. J Managerial Psych 2005;20(2):178-87. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940510579803.
  21. International Labour Organization ILO. Guidelines on occupational safety and health management systems. Geneva: International Labour Organization ILO; 2009.
  22. European Commission. Guidance on risk assessment at work. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities; 1996.
  23. Langenhan MK, Leka S, Jain A. Psychosocial risks: is risk management strategic enough in business and policy making? Saf Health Work 2013;4(2):87-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2013.04.003.
  24. International Organisation for Standardization. Ergonomic principles related to mental workload - Part 1: general issues and concepts, terms and definitions; 2017 (ISO 10075-1:2017).
  25. British Standards Institution. Guidance on the management of psychosocial risks in the workplace; 2011. Available from: http://www.utas.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/604570/Guidance-on-the-management-of-psychosocial-risks-in-the-workplace-1.pdf.
  26. Leka S, Cox T(E). PRIMA-EF guidance on the European framework for psychosocial risk management: a resource for employers and worker representatives; 2008. Available from, http://www.prima-ef.org/uploads/1/1/0/2/11022736/prima-ef_brochure_english.pdf.
  27. Beck D, Splittgerber B. Psychosocial risk assessment: recommendations of the Joint German occupational safety and health strategy. Wirtschaftspsychologie 2016;(3):31-9.
  28. Leka S, Jain A. Health impact of psychosocial hazards at work: an overview. Available from, http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/44428/9789241500272_eng.pdf;jsessionid=56FF50F263D8F717EDCF8ED5BDBBFFD1?sequence=1 2010;2010.
  29. Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. 5th ed. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011.
  30. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg 2010;8(5):336-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007.
  31. Allison JJ, Kiefe CI, Weissman NW, Carter J, Centro RM. The art and science of searching MEDLINE to answer clinical questions: finding the right number of articles. Int J Technol Assessment Health Care 1999;15(2):281-96.
  32. Cook DJ, Sackett DL, Spitzer WO. Methodologic guidelines for systematic reviews of randomized control trials in health care from the potsdam consultation on meta-analysis. J Clinical Epidemiol 1995;48(1):167-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(94)00172-M.
  33. University of York. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Systematic Reviews: CRDs guidance for undertaking reviews in health care; 2009.
  34. National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools. Quality assessment tool for quantitative studies. Hamilton, ON: McMaster University; 2008.
  35. Wolff M, Taskan-Karamursel E, Portune R. The Quick-check procedure for assessing mental stress in school teachers: a process evaluation for the implementation in North Rhine-Westphalia (Federal state of Germany). Wirtschaftspsychologie 2012;14(2):23-36.
  36. Paridon H, Kaufmann M, Schleicher R, Blume A, Hundeloh H, Portune R. Validation of a brief-check questionnaire for the recording of mental stresses among teachers at schools in North Rhine-Westphalia (NRW). Pravention 2010;33(3):74-7.
  37. Schumacher L, Nieskens B, Brauer H, Sieland B. Subtainable health promotion via organisational development - a project for teachers in professional training schools. Gesundheitswesen 2005;67(2):141-4. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2005-857878.
  38. Johnson RA, Richards RR. The use of the nominal group technique to isolate teacher job stressors. Child Youth Serv Rev 1983;5(3):289-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/0190-7409(83)90033-6.
  39. Buhner M. Einfuhrung in die Test- und Fragebogenkonstruktion. 3rd ed. Munchen: Pearson; 2011.
  40. Schnell R, Hill PB, Esser E. Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung. 10th ed. Munchen: Oldenbourg; 2013.
  41. Richter G. Toolbox Version 1.2: instrumente zur Erfassung psychischer Belastungen. Berlin; 2010. Available from, https://www.baua.de/DE/Angebote/Publikationen/Berichte/F1965.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=2.
  42. Fritz C, Lam CF, Spreitzer GM. It's the little things that matter: an examination of knowledge workers' energy management. Academy of Management Perspectives 2011;25(3):28-39. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMP.2011.63886528.
  43. Fritz C, Ellis AM, Demsky CA, Lin BC, Guros F. Embracing work breaks. Organizational Dynamics 2013;42(4):274-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2013.07.005.
  44. Kotter JP. Leading change: why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review 1995;73(2):59-67.
  45. Schaufeli WB, Bakker AB. Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: a multi-sample study. J Organiz. Behav. 2004;25(3):293-315. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.248.
  46. Morillas RM, Rubio-Romero JC, Fuertes A. A comparative analysis of occupational health and safety risk prevention practices in Sweden and Spain. J Safety Res 2013;47:57-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2013.08.005.
  47. Hofmann M, Holzel LP, Frank F, Berger M. Risk assessment for mental stress at work - an intra-European comparison. Arbeitsmedizin Sozialmedizin Umweltmedizin 2015;50:515-21.
  48. Metzler YA, Groeling-Muller G von, Bellingrath S. Better safe than sorry: methods for risk assessment of psychosocial hazards. Safety Science 2019;114:122-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.01.003.

Cited by

  1. Psychological needs matter more than social and organizational resources in explaining organizational commitment vol.62, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12739