참고문헌
- Parsons, J. (2017, Feb. 7). Google and H&M create customized 'Data_Dress' based on your personal information. Mirror, retrieved from https://www.mirror.co.uk/tech/google-hm-create-customised-data_dress-9772022
- Lamkin, P. (2018, Oct. 23). Smart wearables market to double by 2022: $27 billion industry forecast. Forbes, retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/paullamkin/2018/10/23/smart-wearables-market-to-double-by-2022-27-billion-industry-forecast/#24201f022656
- Wearable Devices Market worth $62.82 billion by 2025- Exclusive Report by Meticulous Research. (2019, Oct. 31). Meticulous Research. Retrieved from https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2019/10/31/1938647/0/en/Wearable-Devices-Market-worth-62-82-billion-by-2025-Exclusive-Report-by-Meticulous-Research.html
- Goldstein, D. (2019, Nov. 21). Wearables Market Growth. Mekko Graphics. Retrieved from https://www.mekkographics.com/wearables-market-growth/
- Baskerville, R.L., Kaul, M., & Storey, V.C. (2018). Aesthetics in design science research. European Journal of Information Systems, 27(2), 140-153. DOI: 10.1080/0960085X.2017.1395545
- Hwang, C., Chung, T.-L., & Sanders, E.A. (2016). Attitudes and WTPs for Smart Clothing: Examining U.S. Consumers' Functional, Expressive, and Aesthetic Needs for Solar-Powered Clothing. Clothing & Textiles Research Journal, 34(3), 207-222. DOI: 10.1177/0887302X16646447
- Bloch, P.H. (2018). Involvement Beyond the Purchase Process: Conceptual Issues and Empirical Investigation. Advances in Consumer Research, 9, 413-417.
- Qiu, C., & Hu, Y. (2015). The Review of Smart Clothing Design Research based on the Concept of 3F+1I. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 6(1), 199-208.
- Hassenzahl, M. (2008). Aesthetics in interactive products: Correlates and consequences of beauty. In Schifferstein, H. N. and Hekkert, P., editors, Product Experience, chapter 11, pages 287-302.
- Kumar, M., Townsend, J.D., & Vorhies, D.W. (2015). Enhancing consumers' affection for a brand using product design. Product Innovation Management, 32(5), 716-730. DOI: 10.1111/jpim.12245
- Reimann, M., Zaichkowsky, J., Neuhaus, C., Bender, T., & Weber, B. (2010). Aesthetic package design: A behavioral, neural, and psychological investigation. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20, 431-441. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcps.2010.06.009
- Snoj, B., Korda, A.P., & Mumel, D. (2004). The relationships among perceived quality, perceived risk and perceived product value. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 13(3), 156-167. DOI: 10.1108/10610420410538050
- Woodruff, R.B. & Gardial, S.F. (1996) Know Your Customer New Approaches to Customer Value and Satisfaction. Blackwell, Cambridge, 321-323.
- Sweeney, J.C., & Soutar, G.N. (2001). Consumer perceived value: The development of a multiple item scale. Journal of Retailing, 77(1), 203-220. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-4359(01)00041-0
- Chi, T. & Kilduff, P.P.D., (2011). Understanding consumer perceived value of casual sportswear: An empirical study. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 18(5), 422-429. DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2011.06.004
- Cronin, J. J., Jr., Brady, M. K., & Hult, G.T. M. (2000) Assessing the effects of quality, value, and customer satisfaction on consumer behavioral intentions in service environments. Journal of Retailing, 76:193-218. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-4359(00)00028-2
- Babin, B.J., Darden, W.R., & Griffin, M. (1994). Work and/or Fun: Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(4), 644-656. DOI: 10.1086/209376
- Navarro, D. M.-C., Díaz, E., Rico, M. G., & Collado, A. M. (2019). Examining consumer luxury brand-related behavior intentions in a social media context: The moderating role of hedonic and utilitarian motivations. Physiology & Behavior, 200(1), 104-110. DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.03.028
- Landy, D., & Sigall, H. (1974). Beauty is talent: Task evaluation as a function of the performer's physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29(3), 299-304. DOI: 10.1037/h0036018
- Kleisner, K., Chvatalova, V., & Flegr, J. (2014) Perceived Intelligence Is Associated with Measured Intelligence in Men but Not Women. PLoS ONE, 9(3): e81237. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0081237
- Norman, D.A. (2002). Emotion & Design: Attractive Things Work Better. Interactions, 9(4), 36-42. DOI: 10.1145/543434.543435
- Cross, S. E., & Madson, L. (1997). Models of the self: Self-construals and gender. Psychological Bulletin, 122(1), 5-37. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.122.1.5
- Firat, A.F., & Dholakia, N. (2006). Theoretical and philosophical implications of postmodern debates: some challenges to modern marketing. Marketing Theory, 6(2), 123-162. DOI: 10.1177/1470593106063981
- Wu, L.H., Wu, L.-Ch., & Chan, S.-C. (2016). Exploring consumers' intention to accept smartwatch. Computers in Human Behavior, 64(1), 383-392. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.005
- Borges, A., Babin, B. J., & Spielmann, N. (2013). Gender orientation and retail atmosphere: effects on value perception. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 41(7), 498-511. DOI: 10.1108/IJRDM-02-2012-0014
- Moshagen, M. & Thielsch, M.T. (2010). Facets of design aesthetics. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68(10), 689-709. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2010.05.006
- Fornell, C., & Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equations with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. DOI: 10.2307/3151312
- Perry, A., Malinin, L., Sanders, E., Li, Y., & Leigh, K. (2017). Explore consumer needs and design purposes of smart clothing from designers' perspectives. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 10(3), 372-380. DOI: 10.1080/17543266.2016.1278465